Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Wants Retraction From Newsweek
AP ^ | May 16, 2005 | DINO HAZELL

Posted on 05/16/2005 10:19:56 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

In an apology to readers this week, Newsweek acknowledged errors in a story alleging U.S. interrogators at Guantanamo Bay desecrated the Quran. The accusations, which the magazine vowed to re-examine, spawned protests in Afghanistan that left 15 dead and scores injured.

Responding to harsh criticism from Muslim leaders worldwide, the Pentagon promised to investigate the charges and pinned the deadly clashes on Newsweek for what it described as "irresponsible" reporting.

"We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst," Editor Mark Whitaker wrote in the apology.

The White House said Monday that Newsweek's response was insufficient.

"It's puzzling. While Newsweek now acknowledges that they got the facts wrong, they refuse to retract the story," said presidential spokesman Scott McClellan. "I think there's a certain journalistic standard that should be met. In this instance it was not.

"This was a report based on a single anonymous source that could not substantiate the allegation that was made," McClellan added. "The report has had serious consequences. People have lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged. I just find it puzzling."

In its issue dated May 9, Newsweek had reported that U.S. military investigators had found evidence that interrogators placed copies of Islam's holy book in washrooms and had flushed one down the toilet to get inmates to talk.

Whitaker wrote that the magazine's information came from "a knowledgeable U.S. government source," and writers Michael Isikoff and John Barry had sought comment from two Defense Department officials. One declined to respond, and the other challenged another part of the story but did not dispute the Quran charge, Whitaker said.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; bush; islam; koran; korandesecration; liberalmedia; muslim; newsweek; retraction; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: fooman

WHO ADVERTISES IN NEWSWEEK?

That's who we should put pressure on.


41 posted on 05/16/2005 10:55:59 AM PDT by winner3000 (part)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
From Yahoo:


42 posted on 05/16/2005 10:56:58 AM PDT by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Pull their press credentials. Lock em out of the WH. Ignore their phone calls.
The retraction should take about 2 days.
43 posted on 05/16/2005 10:58:04 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Another stellar moment in journalism. This is worthy of a public apology, at a televised press conference, by the editor of Newsweek. Personally I think these reporters knew exactly what would happen if that story was published, and didn't care. They should be fired at least, charged with something at best. Inciting a riot, committing a hate crime...


44 posted on 05/16/2005 10:58:37 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Free Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Dallas59; tobyhill
Who owns Newsweek?

It seems Newsweek is part owned by Kerry's economic adviser Warren Buffet "Buffett is a pro (and a director of NEWSWEEK's owner, The Washington Post Company".    More info.

45 posted on 05/16/2005 10:59:09 AM PDT by expat_panama (Lo que los gringos piensen que es su país es en realidad nuestra piñata!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paul_fromatlanta

It's the pattern of journalist abuse. Newsweek, while the extremest already hates America, gave them more ammo. President Bush has said we must change the hearts and minds of people in the middle east but the MSM doesn't want their hearts and minds changed because they run out of controversy. While it's people that kill some of them just don't need a gun in their hand and if they have one don't give them the ammo.


46 posted on 05/16/2005 11:01:14 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

I tell what would be really. Wait until the press conference starts and then have McClellan, say 'Wash post, Newsweek , your fired!'

Then have the SS make them do a perp walk out....


Extreme publicity for the MSM and muslim to see!


47 posted on 05/16/2005 11:01:16 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"I say we roll in a couple of canisters of CN-20, and nerve gas the lot of'em."

-Private Vasquez
Aliens.


48 posted on 05/16/2005 11:01:26 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent green is people!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

WHO ADVERTISES IN NEWSWEEK?

There're so many advertisers --they link to msn shopping which of course features TARGET -apparently Wal-mart bashing is for Al Jezira liberals.

But just the same I say boycott the slime-- all of them.  I don't really care if they see reason or not.

49 posted on 05/16/2005 11:01:42 AM PDT by expat_panama (Lo que los gringos piensen que es su país es en realidad nuestra piñata!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst,"

So the family of the dead and our soldiers can hit the "reset" button on their playstation and start over? Whew! Glad that's cleared up. The main thing is they apologized. "Okay people, back to work. We got deadlines looming."


50 posted on 05/16/2005 11:02:18 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet (home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

"WHO ADVERTISES IN NEWSWEEK?"

Bank of America is a big fish.


51 posted on 05/16/2005 11:02:23 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: auzerais

"mail them back with the words:NEWSSWEEK LIED-PEOPLE DIED"

I love it! I'm going out this evening to do exactly that.


52 posted on 05/16/2005 11:04:21 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Carling

exactly. Time for hardball. This isn't freedom of the press. This is tyranny of the press.


53 posted on 05/16/2005 11:04:58 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Whitaker wrote that the magazine's information came from "a knowledgeable U.S. government source," and writers Michael Isikoff and John Barry had sought comment from two Defense Department officials. One declined to respond, and the other challenged another part of the story but did not dispute the Quran charge, Whitaker said.

"You mean the part about a book being flushed down a toilet was serious, and you were wanting a denial of it? Who knew?"

54 posted on 05/16/2005 11:05:41 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fooman

Extreme publicity for the MSM and muslim to see!

***

I don't know that the Muslims will be all that impressed with the publicity. Seems that more than a few of them still believe there is truth to that story.

Personally, I think civil litigation against Newsweek, et al. for wrongful death would be the way to go.


55 posted on 05/16/2005 11:05:53 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
I think a retraction of Newsweek is in order.

I think criminal charges are in order!

56 posted on 05/16/2005 11:06:44 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (If you're not part of the solution, YOU ARE the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
I read some news reports earlier today out of the Mideast. It seems that the Mullahs and their followers are really steamed up at Newsweak. The level of Muslim anger and Islamic outrage cannot be appreciated here in the U.S.

Apology by Newsweak too Little, too Late

People are still dying in riots and after riots over there. The Mullahs desire their revenge and Newsweak is now a primary target. If I were a reporter working for this foul rag, I would be looking to change employers rapidly. In fact, I would take a vacation right away. That jerk spokeman for Newsweak who appeared on the MSM this weekend better learn to 'duck and cover.' I do not think he will be sleeping very well for several months. Or, the Mullahs may have him scheduled for a dirt nap. If you get my drift . . . 'Nuff said.

57 posted on 05/16/2005 11:07:02 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: paul_fromatlanta
At least Falwell told the truth, Muhammad was a terrorists, in addition to being a pedophile, rapists, murderer, etc..

Newsweek lied. I am not overly concerned that a bunch of these Islamic nuts killed each other. If that is the case, no one yet has said who was killed, were they all Muslims or the target of Muslims. How many Americans serving in Afghanistan or Iraq are at threat now because some other Muslim nut will decide this is good reason to get revenge for a perceived slight?
59 posted on 05/16/2005 11:10:16 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Carling
No retraction, no White House press credentials.

Absolutely. Like all public institutions, Newsweek has an obligation to serve the common good. They have done a tremendous amount of damage to our society that must be repaired or compensated for.

60 posted on 05/16/2005 11:12:01 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson