Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Will Defend To Keep It Based On Free Speech (Vanity Plate)
KOMO TV ^ | May 13, 2005 | Liz Rocca

Posted on 05/16/2005 6:12:14 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

'I Will Defend To Keep It Based On Free Speech'

TACOMA - A Tacoma woman says she feels violated by a complaint about her vanity plate. It simply reads: "John 3-16"

But someone found the Bible verse offensive and now the state is deciding whether she can keep the plate.

"The verse in the Bible says 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son,' " says Jane Milhans.

To her, John 3:16 is a message of love, and a great vanity plate. But now, someone has told the state Jane's plate is offensive.

"My first reaction was I was in shock," she said.

Jane says she's had the plate for 21 years without a single complaint.

"It's not profane, it's not bigotry, it's not hatred, it's not evil," she says.

But Brad Benfield with the State Department of Licensing said, "It appears from the complaint that somebody was not happy that a state issued license plate had a religious component."

A Pierce County woman made the complaint, which reads in part: "I was offended that I have to be 'prayed over' by a license plate... What happened to keeping church and state separate?"

We tracked down the woman who lodged the complaint, and she declined an on-camera interview. She says frankly, she's dismayed the state didn't keep her complaint anonymous.

"A lot of people view this as a waste tax dollars to go through this process," Milhans said.

Now Jane says she'll have to defend her plate in front of a review committee, who will decide if she can keep it.

Benfield admits just one complaint can trigger a review.

"We're always interested in finding out if one slipped through the cracks," he said.

They caught one last year. "GOT MILF" was thought to be a play on the milk commercials. It turned out to be a sexual reference to good looking moms.

The state cancelled the plate.

But Jane Milhans vows they won't cancel hers.

"I will defend to keep it based on free speech," she said.

She says she'll fight to spread her message of love.

Last year, the state handled complaints about 16 vanity plates. They canceled four of them.

We should find out next month if Jane can keep hers.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: antitheist; freespeech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2005 6:12:14 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Offended??? By what????


2 posted on 05/16/2005 6:17:40 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

It's crazy that she even has to appear before a state committee. Faith is treated like a hate crime. I guess that's the point.


3 posted on 05/16/2005 6:18:51 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Offended??? By what????

The evil Christian offended her with that horrible Bible verse. Don't you understand? The state didn't protect her eyes from that awful religious message.

4 posted on 05/16/2005 6:22:17 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

"Faith is treated like a hate crime. I guess that's the point."

That and the fact that she's a successful, (probably considered) wealthy Christian. A plate like that on a BMW? Come on! That's considered a target in a place like Washington State, Right? ;)

My plates are due for renewal. Maybe I'll try that one here in Wisconsin if it's not already taken. :)


5 posted on 05/16/2005 6:22:44 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
"Faith is treated like a hate crime. I guess that's the point."

The CHRISTIAN FAITH is treated like a hate crime.

6 posted on 05/16/2005 6:23:51 AM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

ping to self for later pingout.


7 posted on 05/16/2005 6:25:59 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

The wench who snivelled and initiated the complaint should have to appear at the review and explain why that verse is so offensive to her, causing the only complaint in 21 years.


8 posted on 05/16/2005 6:27:25 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (OUT OF ORDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus
The CHRISTIAN FAITH is treated like a hate crime.

BINGO!

9 posted on 05/16/2005 6:28:55 AM PDT by PacesPaines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

How stupid. Some latte sipping, unwashed Greenpeace hippy sees that and gets "offended". OK, that part is fine - you are allowed to be offended by anything (even something as unoffensive as this). But then complain? Come on. Mr. Hippy needs to get laid and find a job (bashing out bad poetry at starbucks doesn't count).


10 posted on 05/16/2005 6:29:14 AM PDT by Atheist_Canadian_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atheist_Canadian_Conservative

Ms Hippy.


11 posted on 05/16/2005 6:30:38 AM PDT by Atheist_Canadian_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

I'm guessing her defense will be that SHE is not offended but someone else might be.

These cowards are always hiding behind nameless, faceless entities.


12 posted on 05/16/2005 6:32:20 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

The next time that woman sees something offensive while driving, she should just close her eyes really tight and floor it until she gets past the offensive object.


13 posted on 05/16/2005 6:33:39 AM PDT by yooling (Does that koran come in two-ply?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

I wonder if this image in Washington state also offended her.

Somehow... I doubt it.

14 posted on 05/16/2005 6:36:17 AM PDT by Preachin' (Keep the Kerry/Edwards tags on your cars so we can identify the root of your disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I saw a "Husker" SD plate recently, does this mean that the state Of South Dakota has endorsed Nebraska athletics?


15 posted on 05/16/2005 6:39:06 AM PDT by SoDak (Not forgetting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I've got nothing wrong with her having that vanity plate. I wonder what she'd think of my bumper sticker though...


16 posted on 05/16/2005 6:47:14 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Does the complainer even know what John 3:16 says, other than it is a religious message to those in the know? Would there be the same treatment if the license plate said:
EXOD20:3
REV22:12 (for a more positive message)

It seems to me there has to be some knowledge for this to be of some offense.

17 posted on 05/16/2005 6:48:52 AM PDT by CanisMajor2002 (“My religious beliefs don’t allow me to be scared.” -- SPC Antrone Vaughn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I am sure that if it said "allah" that the government of the People's Republic of Washinton would not complain.

I will say it again. GREGOIRE IS NOT MY GOVERNOR!

18 posted on 05/16/2005 6:51:11 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
The courts have ruled on these things over and over again. If the state opens up a public area for speech, they cannot discriminate on certain speech because of the state does not approve of its content except in very limited areas (obscenity, public safety, and the like).

Its the same principle as opening up a public park for protests for abortion. If they do that, they cannot completely exclude anti-abortion protesters because that would be favoring a certain content and discriminating against another. They stand no chance really if all the precedents hold, they can only hope for a freak judge...who will then get overturned.
19 posted on 05/16/2005 6:51:27 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'
I wonder if this image in Washington state also offended her. Somehow... I doubt it.

Statue of Lenin. I cringe every time I even hear of it. I am sure Governor GregWhore likes it.

20 posted on 05/16/2005 6:53:42 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson