Why We Will Keep Winning - Republic vs.Democrat Women - (Ours vs. Theirs - No contest!)

Email | MAY 8, 2005 | Unknown

[CHARLITE]

"(Sorry...this is such a shallow thread. Bet you already knew that, Charlite; but who cares? It's fun!)

It is an illustration of how a picture is worth a thousand words. That's all.

Char :)

[CHARLITE]

"...dress like dowdy old women."

I wonder how many pants suits Her Royal Thighness owns. Seriously. How many, d'ya think? Five hundred? - a thousand? ....or a more modest count, like a dozen in each color?

[hosepipe]

WOO-Wee... what a difference..

[Cool Chick]

Where do you get that? Have you ever seen her? She looks even better than that photo, in person, with less make-up. Who are you? Why is plagiarist Monica Crowley on our side? We conservatives believe in property rights, don't we?

[CHARLITE]

"......plagiarist Monica Crowley"????????

What am I missing here? What did Monica Crowley plagiarize?

[who knows what evil?]

Those pictures of the democrat women look like they have been rode hard (probably by each other) and hung out to dry.

Funny stuff...New England is hard-core leftist, and those Democrat chix are a decent representation of what men have to pick from up here. Creepy. (BROAD-BASED STATEMENT ALERT!!! There are EXCEPTIONS to the above statement...PLEASE don't bother posting rebuttals to the above...there are a FEW decent women in New England. I actually married one.)

[Cool Chick]

YES! Monica Crowley is a huge plagiarist. She lifted whole paragraphs of a British guy's article on Nixon, down to his Britishisms for a Wall Street Journal article, and still claims she didn't copy him. Read this:
http://slate.msn.com/id/1003470/
She is a thief and a liar, and not someone we conservatives want on our side. The Wall St. Journal will never publish her again, and there is doubt whether her two books on Nixon and her Ph.D. thesis are her own work or are plagiarism and fabrication. What do you expect from someone who constantly demands to be called "Doctor"?

[Cyber Liberty]

First time I heard that plagerism is a bad thing for a liberal "journalist".

Strange times we live in.

[CHARLITE]

Sorry to be so late in responding to your post, and the information (via slate.com) about Monica Crowley. That's horrifying. I have a whole new opinion of her now. Really too bad. Why would a bright, well educated woman NEED to plagiarize? I can understand a Ward Churchill doing it. He has sawdust in his head to begin with, but Monica is a very intelligent woman. It must be some kind of a personality disorder that causes scholars to do these things - lack of self-esteem?........or lacking confidence in their own intellectual abilities? (Doris Kern Goodwin did the same thing, if you recall........and also claimed that she didn't!!)
Char

[raivyn]

save

[GreenOgre]

Some of those democrats should volunteer their faces as molds for Gorilla Cookies.