Posted on 05/03/2005 2:10:11 PM PDT by EveningStar
Most of Mrs. Bush's humor at the correspondents' dinner was just right: Edgy but not over the edge. But I think the stripper and horse jokes were totally beneath her.
Just put it to the other-shoe test: If it were Teresa Heinz Kerry standing up on the dais telling the same jokes, the conservative commentariat would be buzzing for the rest of the year about what a tasteless skank she is.
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
Uh oh. You wrote the "T" word. Of course now every kook on this thread will accuse you of name calling.
and so it goes......
That was sweet, TM. Laura is truly a gracious, charitable person and I've got to believe she interpreted the joke exactly as you did..
Ya'll lighten up. This is OUR lovely first lady you're chastising. I can't believe this thread..
sw
Good post, Charles.
It's been explained and explained to the "holier than thou" contingent and they are just too offended to get it:
1) It was a ROAST!
2) The horse joke had nothing sexual about it. It was a "city slicker/country folk" joke.
3) By making these jokes, Mrs. Bush was actually poking fun at the media, by playing into their stereotypes of Republicans.
I'd bet you $100.00 that none of them have even seen Desperate Housewives. It's a soap opera, no more, no less. I wouldn't let kids watch, but then I wouldn't let them watch a show like 24, either. Desperate Housewives is entertaining because these are fictional characters. Take it or leave it, but the joke is in the absurdity of it all, that and the hiliarious mental picture of a bunch of high profile Republicans and Supreme Court justices at a Chippendales show!
It's usually the most hypocritical that see a sexual element in something that most normal people do not! I'd be embarassed to post that I thought that joke was about horse masturbation. Michelle Malking made a fool of herself with that comment!
Oh, thank you, thank you--I was afraid I was the only one who thought so, and it was making me crazy to hear myself say "misogynist!"
WHOA!! Good one and right on the money. Since there is no way ever that a Pat Buchanan will be elected Prez - the extreme right want to see themselves as Puppet Masters of the GOP.
>>You only need to hit the post button once.<<
Thanks.
>>You only need to hit the post button once.<<
Thanks.
>>You only need to hit the post button once.<<
Thanks.
>>You only need to hit the post button once.<<
Thanks.
>>You only need to hit the post button once.<<
Thanks.
>>You only need to hit the post button once.<<
Thanks.
LOL!! That's funny right there!
:-)
In the words of the law professor in The Paper Chase, you are a young skull full of mush.
"LEE HARVEY....When you and your buddies tried to make it with that cow!? You and me partying? Forget it."
Displaying the way that repulsive people are repulsive is an entirely different matter than the shock at hearing something totally unexpected coming forth from a icon of classiness.
Displaying the f-word spelled out three times as an example of how people are repulsive(there's a lot more she displayed) and telling a dirty joke -- sure there are some differences. But you miss the point.
You don't think that the president and Laura Bush receive hate mail with the f-word? What about Rush Limbaugh? What about FOX news? I don't see them publicly and graphically displaying their obscene mail with all of the vulgarities spelled out. How cheap is that? How vulgar is that? You don't think their's another way to make that point without coming down to the level of the person who sent the e-mail? If they wanted to communicate that they received such obscene hate mail do you think that they would simply say that they received hate mail with obscene words in it or do you think that they would graphically display the hate mail on their website for all the world to see?
Last week I received an X rated pop-up on my computer screen. Using your logic, it would be perfectly okay to post that picture here when bringing the subject up. What Malkin did was equivalent to what Laura Bush did and maybe even worse in that aspect.
You don't get that do you? Or are you a Malkin-bot who feels that she can do no wrong? For your benefit I'll assume you are the Malkin-bot and not a -- dunce!
Peach said "You sure don't mind speaking about freepers behind their back"
That's rich coming from one who has made several digs at the owner of this forum on this thread "behind his back"..
Agreed, agreed, agreed--and I went to Tallahassee to lobby the State Senate. At one point, I asked (with much hyperbole) why they didn't do an Elian-style grab--then I realized people actually believed he should! I still don't understand the Bush-bashing over that.
FGS, where were you 20 threads ago?
You have it down pat in a nutshell!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.