Posted on 04/27/2005 10:44:02 AM PDT by tgslTakoma
Local radio hosts on WMAL Radio in Washington, DC have been up in arms the past few days over a rally being held on Capitol Hill today in support of the invasion of America by illegal aliens.
One of the organizers of the rally is known as Mexicanos Sin Fronteras (MSF).
Per the announcement below, there are two ways to contact MSF - email or via phone.
With a little investigation, we have found that Mexicanos Sin Fronteras apparently shares its office space and telephone with:
Alliance for Global Justice,
Nicaragua Network,
Mexico Solidarity Network,
SOA Watch,
and (surprise, surprise) International ANSWER.
With a little more investigation, we discovered that the main organizer, Mexico Solidarity Network, has three (3) offices in the United States. Their DC office is located at ANSWER's HQ at 1247 E Street, SE. Their San Francisco office is located at the HQ of Global Exchange / Code Pink, at 2017 Mission Street. Their Chicago office is Mexico Solidarity Network's main HQ, located at 4834 N. Springfield.
The Mexico Solidarity Network is a subsidiary of the Alliance for Global Justice, a 501(c)3, which is HQ'd at 1247 E Street, SE, Washington, DC.
Old truth is still "truth".
I am curious as to what you think Bush has not done given the laws/regulations that are on the books and the money that Congress appropriates.
What has he not done that he was supposed to do?
His corporate and big business buddies who make money off illegal alien labor get away with it because the laws aren't enforced. How about tossing a few of those folks in prison?
LOL, probably shrieking like a bobby-sockser and running around with his autograph book hoping to catch a glimpse of JoeBaca.
Protect America.
"I hope someone hands out flyers that say: 'Pendejos sin fronteras!'"
Help! I'm laughing so hard I'm peeing in my pants... and at work too!
"I hope someone hands out flyers that say: 'Pendejos sin fronteras!'"
Help! I'm laughing so hard I'm peeing in my pants... and at work too!
ping
Could you be a little more definate about what is entailed in Protecting America. What did he not do to protect America that he should have done.
Stop foreign nationals from breaking our laws.
In his proposed budget he did not request the funding for 2000 new border patrol agents even though he had signed into the law the bill that required the hiring of those agents.
Bush shortchanges border funding in budget proposal, and both parties object
March 8, 2005
This week Congressional Democrats and Republicans agreed on something, chastising the White House for failing to fund the 2,000 Border Patrol agents called for in the 2004 intelligence-overhaul law passed at year's end.
Democrats took the lead objecting to Bush's budget proposal, which funds only 210 of the 2,000 agents the new law calls for. They found themselves joined by Republicans.
'There should not be a divide, on the question of terrorism and the potential for an attack on the American people. And that's why I think, even today, the administration has an opportunity to reconsider their decision and change it,' said Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary immigration, border security and claims subcommittee.
She said that the new agents are particularly important because of the increasing flow of so-called 'OTM' -- 'other than Mexican' -- illegal immigrants across the Mexican border.
Sen. Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia Democrat and ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the Bush proposal, submitted as part of the Homeland Security Department's $41.1 billion budget, 'ignores the stark reality of the resources needed to secure the homeland.'
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he was 'not happy' with the president's decision, noting that 200 of the 2,000 new Border Patrol agents were supposed to be assigned along the U.S.-Canada border.
Leahy, also an Appropriations homeland security subcommittee member, said Mr. Bush had failed to heed what he described as a congressional mandate to substantially increase the number of agents along the northern and southern borders.
'The administration is ignoring the call for substantial increases in staffing for the Border Patrol,' he said.
Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, also has been 'disappointed' in the president's decision not to fund 2,000 new agents. He asked President Bush in a letter last month to fully fund the increases authorized in the bill.
The letter was signed by all five House Republican leaders on the intelligence bill: Sensenbrenner and Reps. Henry J. Hyde of Illinois; Duncan Hunter and David Dreier of California; and Peter Hoekstra of Michigan.
see post 31
Bttt!
He was a cheerleader there. (wasn't he a cheerleader in college?)
Last month a few senators amended the budget submittal to include the 2000. Last week the Senate amended the appropriation bill to add 650 border agents. Perhaps it will pass. Lets say it does
Do you really think the difference between 650 and 210 is going to make a difference. If you want to seal the border, it will take 100,000 minimum.
The reality is that Bush and Congress both know that the reform bill will be passed soon and that will alter the dynamics of the border. Neither see the need for a large number of new border agents.
Do you think it would be best to erect gallows in the town square and have a public hanging ot just cut their penis off.
Good post. Some believe there should be severe consequences for what they consider Bush's dereliction of duty. I believe that most people realize that no perfumed prince, political puppet will ever be held accountable for such gross incompetence as long as the owners of the federal farce do not wish it to be so.
Do you think it would be best to erect gallows in the town square and have a public hanging ot just cut their penis off.
Is this some collective penis that they all share, or what? No matter, as the queen said, "off with their head".
I wasn't exactly sure about the plural of penis. Peni?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.