Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/21/2005 2:56:46 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: RWR8189

GO FOR IT!! USE THAT OIL! I certainly don't want to be dependant on other countries when we have so much oil to tap in here.....the resource is here, let's use it!


2 posted on 04/21/2005 3:05:24 AM PDT by FeeinTennessee (Political correctness: dragging us into a pit and making us weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Very interesting news. What is Congress waiting for? Drill!


3 posted on 04/21/2005 3:07:42 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
You know Rush brought this up a month or so ago...the reason it hasn't been tapped up until now is that it is not cost effective to recover Oil Shale and Tar Sands until the price of oil is over $30 a barrel....now with $50 a barrel prices, things "SHOULD" move forward....but who knows what will finally trigger action on this...perhaps Orrin Hatch pushing it might get the ball rolling?
4 posted on 04/21/2005 3:11:24 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society "( Robert Heinlien).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
"Why has Canada moved forward in leaps and bounds, while the United States has yet to take even a baby step in this direction?

I think he knows the answer to that question.

5 posted on 04/21/2005 3:13:54 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Advanced Directive -- don't step on my blue suede shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I have a gunny sack of this tar sand. It is very fine sand, like from a seashore. The amalgum is only slightly more juicy than road asphalt. A reverse solvent wash cleans it out of the sand quite easily and leaves a heavy tar.


6 posted on 04/21/2005 3:17:02 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Utah sits on huge oil reserve.....called the Public Lands and Parks of the U.S.A. in all states

/U.N.

7 posted on 04/21/2005 3:17:09 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

This is an opportunity for the USA to stick it to radical Islam.


9 posted on 04/21/2005 3:28:41 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
"Who would have guessed that in just Colorado and Utah, there is more recoverable oil than in the Middle East?"

FWIW, I think we should deplete the oil reserves from the Middle East before we tap into our stash.

12 posted on 04/21/2005 3:41:17 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Oil shale is a tad difficult to work with. There's a river of it about 10 miles wide extending from the Michigan border to the Ohio in Indiana.

It's also highly radioactive. (This is the stuff they used to make the now banned "black boards" out of).

That particular deposit could supply all our energy needs for many centuries.

13 posted on 04/21/2005 3:48:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

btttt


19 posted on 04/21/2005 4:08:50 AM PDT by dennisw ("Sursum corda")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I hope it's nowhere near Arches or Bryce canyon or any of the other nat'l parks.


25 posted on 04/21/2005 4:58:56 AM PDT by Huck (One day the lion will lay down with the lamb; Until that day comes, I want America to be the lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

The article fails to mention that technology to extract that sort of oil makes its more expensive than oil from the middle east. Canada's shale oil is normally 10 dollars more expensive than the market value.


27 posted on 04/21/2005 5:18:20 AM PDT by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Apples and oranges. The Alberta oil sands costs around $13 to produce a barrel of synthetic crude oil whereas it will probably cost three times as much per barrel if using oil shale as the stock.

A better move would be to exponentially increase investment and development of the Alberta oil sands and just utilize or expand existing transcontinental pipelines into US hub markets.


30 posted on 04/21/2005 5:29:03 AM PDT by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
This is twenty year old news. Every time oil prices go up, they start talking about shale oil. My advice, don't hold your breath.

The word "shortage" doesn't appear anywhere in the Kingdom dictionary.

36 posted on 04/21/2005 5:35:53 AM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Proverbs 10:30 The righteous shall never be removed: but the wicked shall not inhabit the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
"Who would have guessed that in just Colorado and Utah, there is more recoverable oil than in the Middle East?" Hatch said.

As I recall, I made this very guess (not specific to Colorado/Utah though) just a couple of weeks ago!

46 posted on 04/21/2005 6:10:27 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Need quote from supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
If they were commercially viable, they wouldn't need Congressional action to get developed.

Oil Shale and Tar Sands are not the same thing. At 50.00/barrel some tar sands are profitable, not all, no shale oil is.
Some tar sands in Canada are now marginally profitable.

All the major energy companies have had pilot plants to develop more economical recovery techniques running and experimenting for over 50 years.

If you don't mind paying around $100.00/barrel equivilent prices, then we have enough shale oil, tar sands natural gas, coal and tretiarily recoverable petroleum, to supply all our energy needs for the next 400 years.

So9

56 posted on 04/21/2005 7:04:20 AM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onedoug

ping


60 posted on 04/21/2005 8:13:23 AM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Unless I'm confused again, in rough numbers this is about 100 years worth of oil at the US rate of use.


76 posted on 04/21/2005 1:05:05 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Bush Aide: Oil's Not Well With Annan
NY Post | April 22, 2005 | Post Wire Services
Posted on 04/23/2005 5:59:43 AM PDT by Liz
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1389664/posts


83 posted on 04/23/2005 10:05:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Monday, April 11, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Keep importing until the Middle East runs dry, then start exporting and bring all our money home, plus some.


84 posted on 04/23/2005 10:12:20 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson