Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth about the "Hollywood Ten"
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | April 18, 2005 | Art Eckstein

Posted on 04/18/2005 10:47:45 AM PDT by Liz

In 1947, the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) began a series of official inquiries into the penetration of the Hollywood film industry by the American Communist Party (CPUSA).

Major public hearings were held in 1947 and 1951, with smaller hearings throughout the mid-1950s. In the course of these inquiries, dozens of “friendly” Hollywood witnesses denounced hundreds of people as secret members of the Communist Party, while dozens of “unfriendly” witnesses refused to discuss their politics with the Committee. Those who were either publicly or privately denounced as members of the CPUSA found it almost impossible to get employment in the motion-picture industry for at least for a decade.

The most famous victims of the resulting blacklist were the original group of “unfriendly” witnesses, known as the “Unfriendly Ten” or “Hollywood Ten.” These individuals–mostly screenwriters– refused to give political information about themselves before HUAC in October 1947.1

The blacklist functioned in part officially, as demonstrated by a joint public announcement of the motion picture firms in November 1947 that henceforth no studio would knowingly employ any member of the Communist Party, or the members of any other group which advocated the overthrow of the United States government by revolution.

The blacklist also operated unofficially, through instruments such as the irresponsible red-baiting newsletter Red Channels, which named whole swaths of people as subversives. This, for example, ruined the career of the left-wing but non-Communist actress Marsha Hunt. 2

The blacklist also often functioned in secret: jobs just dried up. As a result, “fixers” emerged to get people unofficially “pardoned” by anti-Communist organizations and film industry managers, therefore making them employable again. One famous “fixer” was the fiercely anti-Communist actor Ward Bond. 3

“Fronts” arose as well in the form of people offering scripts ghost-written by blacklisted screenwriters in exchange for official credit for the script and often a cut of the payment. One famous example of such a “front” was Philip Yordan, himself a quite famous screenwriter. 4

Some film careers were totally destroyed as a result of the blacklist system. For instance, Mickey Knox, “the next John Garfield,” was a rising star of the late 1940s, turning in a star performance in the great gangster film White Heat (1949). If you have never heard of Mickey Knox, well, that is the point. Many other careers suffered severe setbacks, such as that of actor Howard Da Silva. 5

Actors and directors suffered more severely than screenwriters because they could not act or direct under assumed names, whereas screenwriters could use the “front” system, which allowed the most talented of them to continue to write. The CPUSA, however, had made its largest inroads in Hollywood among screenwriters, and many screenwriters’ careers suffered greatly or ended.

It is generally not a good idea to attack professional writers because they tend to write, and to write well, to get in the last word. This has certainly been the case with the blacklist. None of the HUAC committee or staff (which originally included Congressman Richard M. Nixon) has written memorably on the events of 1947 and 1951, let alone on the later, smaller investigations.

A few of those who appeared as “friendly witnesses” before HUAC, such as directors Edward Dmytryk and Elia Kazan, and actor Sterling Hayden. have written important memoirs, often defending their conduct and sometimes expressing self-doubt. 6

But such figures are far outnumbered by the self-justifying and bitter memoirs of those who were denounced: Norma Barzman; Walter Bernstein; Alvah Bessie; Herbert Biberman; Conrad Bromberg; Lester Cole; Lillian Hellman; Howard Koch; Ring Lardner, Jr. (and now his daughter Kate); Donald Ogden Stewart; Dalton Trumbo; and Ella Winter. 7

The publication of these works, and more fundamentally the cultural shift in Hollywood to domination by a bien peasant Left that started around 1960 and accelerated in the 1970s, has led to the lionization of the Unfriendly Ten as American “rebels” and martyred “non-conformists.”

Meanwhile, the anger within the current filmmaking elite at those who originally “named names” in the 1940s and 1950s has been unremitting. A now unalterable view of what occurred is held by people who have little knowledge of what it actually meant in the 1940s to be a Communist; that is, a Stalinist. Two examples demonstrate the current political situation.

Long read---rest at link.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: communists; hollywood; hollywoodleft; hollywoodten; huac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-345 next last
To: Calpernia
I concede that I was not as clear as I should have been. What I meant was that artists shouldn't be persecuted even if they do have far left wing beliefs. That's all. I wasn't defending the practical value of those beliefs. I immigrated to the U.S. from the Soviet Union in the 1970s and would be the last person on Earth to be a Communist. :-) Regards.
181 posted on 04/19/2005 7:57:17 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

Ann Coulter's description of the hearings really took me by suprise. I took McCarthy to be a red-mongering witch hunter as the liberal history writers would like me to accept. After all, I never heard any OTHER interpretation of those events.

After I read her book, I did some research, downloaded the transcripts of the hearings from the appropriate government web site that makes them available, and then I sat and read through them.

I must say...her version sounds a lot more like what is reflected in the transcripts than anything I had ever heard over the years, and by a long shot, too.

I now believe Joseph McCarthy was a real American hero. As Ann Coulter said in her book, he bought us time, and made being a Communist a stain, as it should have been. Our country owes him a lot. We should honor his service as faithfully as any serviceman who lost his life in combat, which in my opinion, he did, if you know how he died.


182 posted on 04/19/2005 8:04:40 AM PDT by rlmorel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
That was a great post. Pardon me while I emphasize it.

Ann Coulter's description of the hearings really took me by suprise. I took McCarthy to be a red-mongering witch hunter as the liberal history writers would like me to accept. After all, I never heard any OTHER interpretation of those events.

After I read her book, I did some research, downloaded the transcripts of the hearings from the appropriate government web site that makes them available, and then I sat and read through them.

I must say...her version sounds a lot more like what is reflected in the transcripts than anything I had ever heard over the years, and by a long shot, too.

I now believe Joseph McCarthy was a real American hero. As Ann Coulter said in her book, he bought us time, and made being a Communist a stain, as it should have been. Our country owes him a lot. We should honor his service as faithfully as any serviceman who lost his life in combat, which in my opinion, he did, if you know how he died.

183 posted on 04/19/2005 8:25:26 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Borges; Grampa Dave; Calpernia; Fedora; Blurblogger; geedee; George Smiley; trisham; Radioactive

Please. I used the word "technicolor" as a writing device to emphasize a point, not to suggest Riefenstahl's work was in color. Why don't you try to think bigger thoughts, instead of relying on your ambitious provincialism?

BTW, that Disney was the only one to meet with Riefenstahl is a popular agenda-centric myth.


Most interesting is the number of German emigres who settled in Hollywood through the help of networks. Hollywood mogul Carl Laemmle helped fellow Germans out during the Nazi era. By one researcher’s account, Laemmle provided at least 300 affidavits, documents that guaranteed that an applicant for a US visa would be employed in Hollywood (and not become a public charge).

This concentrated milieu of immigrants had an inordinate and profound influence on films for years to come.


184 posted on 04/19/2005 8:44:06 AM PDT by Liz (One of it's most compelling tenets is Catholicism's acknowledgement of individual free will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Please. I used the word "technicolor" as a writing device to emphasize a point, not to suggest Riefenstahl's work was in color. Why don't you try to think bigger thoughts, instead of relying on your ambitious provincialism?

Sorry about the midunderstanding.

BTW, that Disney was the only one to meet with Riefenstahl is a popular agenda-centric myth.

Here's one source:

"For her Hollywood stay Riefenstahl booked a bungalow at the Beverly Hills Hotel. Despite a hostile press and the billboard equivalent of “Leni Go Home!,” the world's most famous (or infamous) female director gained an audience with Walt Disney, although he did refuse her offer of a private showing of Olympia. He was just too afraid of a possible boycott of Disney films. Other studio heads treated her like the pariah she had become, refusing to see her at all. An invitation to meet with Gary Cooper was suddenly and “regretfully” cancelled. Even Disney would later make the unconvincing claim that he hadn't known who Riefenstahl really was."

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/lriefenstahl.html

This concentrated milieu of immigrants had an inordinate and profound influence on films for years to come.

I agree. What's your point? Immigrants often appreicate the greatness of America more then the native born.
185 posted on 04/19/2005 8:53:19 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Lillian Hellman was a stupid communist who defended Stalin until Kruschev denounced him. She wasn't just a liberal she was a communist till the end. Whether the blacklist was as perfasive as this article suggests or not, she was still defending a country that was enslaving millions and wanted to the same thing to the US. It's as if a present day actor was defending Bin Laden.


186 posted on 04/19/2005 8:53:38 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
He wasn't guilty of communism, just contempt of Congress, is that not right?

--------------------------------

That is not right. Americans have the right to be quiet. He invoked that right. btw...how is one guilty of communism? When did belonging to any party become a crime in the USA?

187 posted on 04/19/2005 10:35:17 AM PDT by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
Perhaps Mr. DaSilva was wronged. But many men have been sent to prison for crimes they DID NOT commit. THat doesn't mean we should change our minds on theft, murder, rape and the like or the necessity for going after (In some way, shape or form) those responsible....

_---------------------------------------

Pleae show me where I even hinted that my thoughts include what you wrote in your second paragraph.

188 posted on 04/19/2005 10:37:16 AM PDT by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

The issue is that people belonged not just to a home grown American radical leftist party but the Soviet Communist Party which was actively working to overthrow the American goverment.


189 posted on 04/19/2005 11:07:58 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Borges

No, the issue in all my posts is that Howard DaSilva was black listed for ten years with not even the accusation that he ever was a member of the communist or any party.


190 posted on 04/19/2005 11:11:49 AM PDT by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Oh I know. My contention has always been that apart from a select few most of the blacklisted film artists were political dilettantes going wherever the chic wind was blowing and did not pose a threat to national security.
191 posted on 04/19/2005 11:21:26 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: dmz
Of the 10 listed as the Hollywood 10, is there any freeper commenting on this thread who can point to a crime than any one of them committed?

In my mind, they were no worse than that neo-nazi professor who recently got sh!t-canned by his university once his political ideas were exposed. As for the Hollywood 10, their "unpopular ideas" were simply that the US should abolish the constitution and adopt Soviet-style communism. Personally, I think "freedom of speech" ends when someone is advocating the abolition of the First Amendment.

These guys were all guilty of contempt of congress and got off easy for it. If you've ever watched the video tape of their "testimony," you know that they wanted to create a national media circus to help advance the cause. If you ask me, they all should have been thrown in jail.
192 posted on 04/19/2005 11:50:49 AM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Get it? No work for ten years because of what someone else said about him...that's not right.

He should have testified before Congress. Remaining silent wasn't an option--it was contempt of Congress. Based on his reaction, I'd say he probably was a communist.
193 posted on 04/19/2005 11:53:21 AM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All
VERY relevant thread

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1386807/posts
'Schindler's List' Co-Producer Sentenced
194 posted on 04/19/2005 12:13:49 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: dmz
It would help if you even knew what you were talking about. The blacklist did not originate with the government. It was the studios. Do the studios have a right to hire whomever they choose? It's called capitalism, baby. Hire a known communist, nobody goes to see your movie, and that's a lot of money down the drain. As for the precious little angels who refused to comply with a Congressional committee and were thus jailed for contempt, I'm sorry if they aren't above you or me. We'd be jailed for the same thing. And if you'll read the linked article, that son-of-a-bitch Trumbo was gladly willing to name names when it helped the Soviets. He named people who sought out his own book because he had disavowed said book once Hitler invaded Poland. To Hell with these people. They took a pledge to defend the Soviet Union against the United States if it came to that, everything they did was in support of the Soviet Union, and I'm not too broken up about Congress bringing that information to light. Interestingly, they didn't cry foul when HUAC was investigating the KKK.
195 posted on 04/19/2005 12:14:00 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
Interesting fact...in 1941 there was a Senate subcommittee formed to investigate 'warmongers' (read: Jews) in Hollywood who were supposedly making films to propagandize Americans enter the current European war. After Pearl Harbor it was quickly disbanded.
196 posted on 04/19/2005 12:30:22 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
how is one guilty of communism?

Your not. That's my point. Lefties often think that this is what the Ten were charged with. This is not true. It was contempt of Congress...the fact that they did not cooperate was their crime.

197 posted on 04/19/2005 12:33:35 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

It would help if you would read before ranting. Just a thought.


198 posted on 04/19/2005 12:48:48 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The list will be way longer this time around most people making movies in Hollywood are very Un-american.


199 posted on 04/19/2005 12:50:37 PM PDT by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Da Silva mey well have been a party member but he was never officially accused of anything and never convicted of contempt of congress. The HUAC Hollywood hearings was a blot on our freedoms of association and speech. Equating a studio actor (somebody with zero power of any kind) with anyone like the Rosenbergs (genuine traitors and deservedly executed)doesn't make the injustice any less distasteful to those who respect those freedoms.

My opimion on this has nothing to do with communism, it is all about the rights of speech and association.

200 posted on 04/19/2005 12:52:02 PM PDT by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson