Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Granddaughter yanks grandma's feeding tube
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 7, 2005 | Sarah Foster

Posted on 04/07/2005 5:34:06 PM PDT by News Hunter

Edited on 04/07/2005 5:39:05 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

In a situation recalling the recent death of Terri Schindler-Schiavo in Florida, an 81-year-old widow, denied nourishment and fluids for nearly two weeks, is clinging to life in a hospice in LaGrange, Ga., while her immediate family fights desperately to save her life before she dies of starvation and dehydration.

Mae Magouirk was neither terminally ill, comatose nor in a "vegetative state," when Hospice-LaGrange accepted her as a patient about two weeks ago upon the request of her granddaughter, Beth Gaddy, 36, an elementary school teacher.Also upon Gaddy's request and without prior legal authority, since March 28 Hospice-LaGrange has denied Magouirk normal nourishment or fluids via a feeding tube through her nose or fluids via an IV. She has been kept sedated with morphine and ativan, a powerful tranquillizer.

Her nephew, Ken Mullinax, told WorldNetDaily that although Magouirk is given morphine and ativan, she has not received any medication to keep her eyes lubricated during her forced dehydration.

"They haven't given her anything like that for two weeks," said Mullinax. "She can't produce tears."

The dehydration is being done in defiance of Magouirk's specific wishes, which she set down in a "living will," and without agreement of her closest living next-of-kin, two siblings and a nephew: A. Byron McLeod, 64, of Anniston, Ga.; Ruth Mullinax, 74, of Birmingham, Ala.; and Ruth Mullinax's son, Ken Mullinax.

Magouirk's husband and only child, a son, are both deceased.

In her living will, Magouirk stated that fluids and nourishment were to be withheld only if she were either comatose or "vegetative," and she is neither. Nor is she terminally ill, which is generally a requirement for admission to a hospice.

Magouirk lives alone in LaGrange, though because of glaucoma she relied on her granddaughter, Beth Gaddy, to bring her food and do errands.

Two weeks ago, Magouirk's aorta had a dissection, and she was hospitalized in the local LaGrange Hospital. Her aortic problem was determined to be severe, and she was admitted to the intensive care unit. At the time of her admission she was lucid and had never been diagnosed with dementia.

Claiming that she held Magouirk's power of attorney, Gaddy had her transferred to Hospice-LaGrange, a 16-bed unit owned by the same family that owns the hospital. Once at the hospice, Gaddy stated that she did not want her grandmother fed or given water.

"Grandmama is old and I think it is time she went home to Jesus," Gaddy told Magouirk's brother and nephew, McLeod and Ken Mullinax. "She has glaucoma and now this heart problem, and who would want to live with disabilities like these?"

Gaddy's telephone is not in operation and she could not be reached for comment.

According to Mullinax, his aunt's local cardiologist in LaGrange, Dr. James Brennan, and Dr. Raed Agel, a highly acclaimed cardiologist at the nationally renowned University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center, determined that her aortic dissection is contained and not life-threatening at the moment.

Mullinax also states that Gaddy did not hold power of attorney, a fact he learned from the hospice's in-house legal counsel, Carol Todd.

On March 31, Todd told Ruth and Ken Mullinax during a phone conversation Georgia law stipulated that Ruth Mullinax and her brother, A.B. McLeod, were entitled to make any and all decisions for Magouirk. Ruth Mullinax immediately told Todd to begin administering food and fluids through an IV and a nasal feeding tube.

Todd had the IV fluids started that evening, but informed the family that they would have to come to the hospice to sign papers to have the feeding tube inserted. Once that was done, Magouirk would not be able to stay at the hospice.

Ken Mullinax recalled that Todd said the only reason Magouirk was in the hospice in the first place was that the LaGrange Hospital had failed to exercise due diligence in closely examining the power of attorney Beth Gaddy said she had, as well as exercising the provisions of Magouirk's living will.

Todd explained that Gaddy had only a financial power of attorney, not a medical power of attorney, and Magouirk's living will carefully provided that a feeding tube and fluids should only be discontinued if she was comatose or in a "vegetative state" – and she was neither.

Gaddy, however, was not dissuaded. When Ken Mullinax and McLeod showed up at the hospice the following day, April 1, to meet with Todd and arrange emergency air transport for Magouirk's transfer to the University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center, Hospice-LaGrange stalled them while Gaddy went before Troup County, Ga., Probate Court Judge Donald W. Boyd and obtained an emergency guardianship over her grandmother.

Under the terms of his ruling, Gaddy was granted full and absolute authority over Magouirk, at least for the weekend. She took advantage of her judge-granted power by ordering her grandmother's feeding tube pulled out, just hours after it had been inserted.

Florida law requires that a hearing for an emergency guardianship must be held within three days of its request, and Magouirk's hearing was held April 4 before Judge Boyd. Apparently, he has not made a final ruling, but favors giving permanent guardianship power to Gaddy, who is anxious to end her grandmother's life.

Ron Panzer, president and founder of Hospice Patients Alliance, a patients' rights advocacy group based in Michigan, told WND that what is happening to Magouirk is not at all unusual.

"This is happening in hospices all over the country," he said. "Patients who are not dying – are not terminal – are admitted [to hospice] and the hospice will say they are terminally ill even if they're not. There are thousands of cases like this. Patients are given morphine and ativan to sedate them. If feeding is withheld, they die within 10 days to two weeks. It's really just a form of euthanasia."

Ken Mullinax does not want that to happen to his aunt. He pointed out that one of the ironies in this tragedy is that the now-helpless woman worked for years as a secretary for a prominent local cancer doctor.

"She devoted her whole life to helping those who heal others, and now she's being denied sustenance for life," he said.

Mullinax said he has begged Gaddy to let him take on full responsibility for his aunt's care.

"If she would just give us a chance to keep Aunt Mae alive, that's all we ask," he said. "They [Beth and her husband, Dennis Gaddy] have a family and Beth is a teacher, and it was just getting to be a lot of trouble. But I'm the caregiver for my mom, and Aunt Mae could move in with us. We'll buy another house with a bedroom and we'll take care of her. She can move in with us once she can leave the hospital."

But her health becomes more precarious by the hour. Her vital signs are still good, but since admission to hospice she has not been lucid – "but who would be since nourishment and fluids have been denied since March 28," Mullinax remarked.

Attorney Carol Todd could not be reached for comment; a message on her voicemail said she would not be gone the entire week of April 4. Hospice-LaGrange did not return phone calls.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: cary; cultureofdeath; deathcult; euthanasia; feedingtube; grandma; hitlerwouldapprove; hospice; magouirk; necrocapitalism; schiavo; terri; thirdreich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 721-727 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: News Hunter
I figure the courts favor granddaughter becuase granddaughter is physically closest to grandma, running errands and so forth. The court might reason that the other blood relatives aren't interested enough, since they live so far away.

I note the line in the story that asserts the court is inclined to give guardianship to the granddaughter "permanently."

62 posted on 04/07/2005 6:12:00 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The immediate family can simply ask for her discharge from the facility and get it. So we're not getting all the facts here, just a bunch of hysteria.

Umm.... so why haven't they?

63 posted on 04/07/2005 6:12:05 PM PDT by Terriergal (What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mother22wife21
No apologies necessary. I think the moral and cultural importance of this deserves multiple threads, IMO.


64 posted on 04/07/2005 6:12:51 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Let's get the Insurrection started, already..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
the other blood relatives aren't interested enough,

Now, THAT is a sad commentary.

65 posted on 04/07/2005 6:12:52 PM PDT by Terriergal (What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

If the granddaughter had the appropriate POA, why would the hospice have reinserted the feeding tube at the nephew's request? Also, why would she have to go to court to get an emergency guardianship order if she had the medical POA?


66 posted on 04/07/2005 6:13:06 PM PDT by SilentServiceCPOWife (Welcome to the Hotel Free Republic-You can check out any time you like but you can never leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

May I suggest you mind your own business.


67 posted on 04/07/2005 6:13:13 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Oh No I was just agreeing.


68 posted on 04/07/2005 6:15:15 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Sounds like you have a problem?

Tomorrow is Friday ~

69 posted on 04/07/2005 6:15:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
So we're not getting all the facts here, just a bunch of hysteria.

Yep.

70 posted on 04/07/2005 6:15:36 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I can't figure out the reference to Florida either. Isn't this story set in Georgia?

I think that's just typical WND crappy reporting. I assume they meant Georgia, but if they can't get that simple fact right, which ones do we take as gospel?

71 posted on 04/07/2005 6:16:06 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

What a crazy and insane person this granddaughter is. I hope the family has murder charges filed against her. It is not up to her to decide when her grandmother must die.


72 posted on 04/07/2005 6:16:16 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Tonights 10 minutes of hate.


73 posted on 04/07/2005 6:16:51 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Florida law requires that a hearing for an emergency guardianship must be held within three days of its request, and Magouirk's hearing was held April 4 before Judge Boyd. Apparently, he has not made a final ruling, but favors giving permanent guardianship power to Gaddy, who is anxious to end her grandmother's life.

So why do we care what Florida law says about a woman in a hospice in Georgia?


74 posted on 04/07/2005 6:16:51 PM PDT by Deepest South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
But taking this at face value, it's worse than the Schiavo case. Nobody is apparently alleging that the woman is either terminal nor in a PVS.

Interestingly, neither diagnosis (PVS or terminal) is required in Florida either, to justify death by starvation.

Supreme Court of Florida.

In re GUARDIANSHIP OF Estelle M. BROWNING.
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Doris F. HERBERT, etc., Respondent.

No. 74174.

Sept. 13, 1990.

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review In re Guardianship of Browning, 543 So.2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), in which the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

Whether the guardian of a patient who is incompetent but not in a permanent vegetative state and who suffers from an incurable, but not terminal condition, may exercise the patient's right of self-determination to forego sustenance provided artificially by a nasogastric tube?

Id. at 274. [FN1] We answer the question in the affirmative as qualified in this opinion.

http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/browning.txt <-- Link

Browning was 82 or so, stroke victim. She did have a written advance directive. The patient was not PVS and was not terminal. Florida court system holds that starving these patients to death is legal. Note the decision dates to 1990.

75 posted on 04/07/2005 6:17:20 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

I was pinged this morning!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1379016/posts


76 posted on 04/07/2005 6:17:26 PM PDT by LadyPilgrim (Sealed my Pardon with HIS BLOOD!!! Hallelujah!!! What a Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

I suspect that for the sake of the people of the Nation this "teacher" needs to be prosecuted for all kinds of crimes.

Think a judge would see the sense of it?

What if we began asking the Lord of heaven to see that those who perpetrate this kind of crime receive, from on high, that same reward as they have given to others.

Based on the following:
Mat 5:7 "Blessed [are] the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy."


77 posted on 04/07/2005 6:17:27 PM PDT by Spirited (God, Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

Gee, I wonder why older people do not want to go to the hospital?


78 posted on 04/07/2005 6:17:56 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
A living will does no good even if you place in front of the judge yourself. If your granddaughter wants to spread her legs for the judge, and he does probate, you're going down

So you are saying this is what Gaddy did?

79 posted on 04/07/2005 6:19:55 PM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

follow the money on this one


80 posted on 04/07/2005 6:21:04 PM PDT by dennisw ("Sursum corda")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 721-727 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson