Posted on 03/29/2005 6:14:30 PM PST by goldstategop
RUSH: Back to the phones, and we'll go to Clarkston, Michigan. This Don. Welcome to the program, sir. Nice to have you with us.
CALLER: Hey, union thug dittos, Rushbo.
RUSH: Great to have you. Yeah.
CALLER: Yes, sir. Do you have an advance directive, sir, an advance medical directive?
RUSH: You are asking personal information from the host?
CALLER: No, sir, I'm just asking a "yes" or a "no," whether or not you do, sir.
RUSH: I do. I have that and much more.
CALLER: Okay.
RUSH: You want some details? I'll even give you details.
CALLER: No, sir. I was just wondering because I think the only way we're ever going to solve this problem is if everybody has an AMD. I just don't see any other way to solve it. Everybody has to have one, otherwise people are going to continue to rely on the court system to decide life or death.
RUSH: Well, yes, true. But the medical community is going to be more and more involved as well, if those circumstances such as your advanced medical directive, your AMD or the living will is not in force. But, you know, I've learned a lot from this case. You know, I had a basic little living will before this case happened, but I have made changes. I've got one of these directives. But I got real specific with it. For example, anybody named as a beneficiary in my will who participates in the removal of a feeding tube gets cut out of the will. I have made it very plain. I am going to try to be in as much control over myself as I can before this circumstance, were it to happen to me, would happen to me. I'm not going to allow family members who for whatever reason -- I don't care if they're compassionate for me. It's so well defined, and as medical advance takes place before the time of my passage to eternity, I will update it to reflect those advances in medicine, because this is just too (interruption). What are you laughing at in there, Brian? "Before my passage to eternity?" Well, it's what I believe. This has just been too instructive for me. Megan, Kansas City, Missouri, you're next on the EIB Network.
CALLER: Rush, it's just an honor to talk to you. I just love you.
RUSH: Thank you.
CALLER: I have a comment on -- or I have an opinion, rather, on -- why Jesse Jackson is saying what he is saying and I think it has to do with because of his ethnicity and in the past having the three-fifths compromise and how people have viewed black people as three-fifths of a person, he might have a special interest.
RUSH: I think you've got a point. I think that's one of the reasons why the Congressional Black Caucus is concerned about this.
CALLER: I also have maybe an idea for the Democratic Party if they're considering these people less than people. If they can get a whole bunch of them together maybe they can do the three-fifths compromise again for the Democratic Party.
RUSH: (Laughing.) You never know. You know, this does touch a lot of nerves that people don't have the willingness to publicly express, like the Congressional Black Caucus. It comes as news to me that they hold this position. They've not been (interruption). Is that hard to find, Mr. Snerdley? No, I'm not surprised, but what I'm surprised is that nobody knows it. What I'm surprised is that the press is not trumpeting this. What I'm surprised is that the CBC and its leaders are not standing up and proclaiming their position on this. I mean, they have it within their group when they take their caucus votes and this sort of thing. But yeah, you know, when you go back and look at the history of slavery in the country, the founding of the country, black people were considered three-fifths of a person, talk about personhood being denied. So this has some chilling effects on certain members of our population. John in Pittsburgh, you're next and welcome to the program, sir. Hello.
CALLER: Hey, Rush, pro-personhood dittos from the 'burbs.
RUSH: Thank you, sir. Great to have you with us.
CALLER: I listened to the sound bite, Felos, Michael Schiavo's lawyer in the last hour --
RUSH: Yes.
CALLER: -- and here's what I find really bizarre about this. When you point out to people who want to let Terri starve, by their own arguments she's not suffering at all. You say to them, "Well, she's in no pain. If she's not aware at all of her own existence then how exactly is it merciful to let her die?" They sort of shift the argument around, shift their position and say, "Well, it's not about her physical suffering really, it's about her dignity. She should be allowed to die with dignity." And here you have this smarmy, creepy lawyer, Felos –- a complete stranger to Terri, not even a medical person, by the way -- discussing her urine output at a press conference beamed around the globe to millions of people. I guess that's their definition of dying with dignity, though.
RUSH: Hmm. (Laughing.) Well said, sir.
CALLER: Thank you.
RUSH: (Laughing.) Well said, dying with dignity. Yeah, kidneys are beginning to fail. He's sending a signal to people who are informed as to how death will occur in this case, that it's getting closer. That's what he was doing. But don't leave out the fact that he paints this picture of her room with the flowers and the music. Of course, she doesn't know it. She's a vegetable. She's a nonperson. A little stuffed cat there, tabby cat in her arm. It's meant to be a picture of peace and serenity for us, and we will project and think, "Oh, wow, I would love to die with music playing and I would love to die with flowers around. I would love to die with a pet tabby cat animal in my arm. What a wonderful room! What a wonderful situation," and then it sort of argues against the fact she doesn't have any clue, according to what they're telling us. So this is, you know, none of this is being done for her. It's all being done to paint a picture so that people who go in the room can come out and tell us what they saw.
Mass on Sundays.
My wonderful pets to visit.
Husband cannot bring new girlfriends into my room at all.
Judge Greer will not be allowed to hear my case if my personhood should become litigated in any manner.
P.S. Rush, Sean, both Michaels, David, Lee and Melanie, thanks for doing the heavy liftiing for Terri Schiavo and the Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Leni
Seems like he reneged on his pledge.
Sounds like Soylent Green...
along with his duties as her legal guardian.
LOL!!
I agree.
When I brought this up with my family, before I could say a word, my "cutest" son-in-law said "You don't even have to bring it up or worry about it. You're not even getting a plug." :-)
Then why don't you throw yourself off the building now, heck you're going to die eventually, why not just put yourself out of your misery now.
Here in North Carolina, you can sue an estate if you think you can make ANY claim -- and the estate has to pay for YOUR lawyer's fees! What do you have to lose?
Because I'm not in any misery.
When I am I will certainly go fast and by a cleaner method than defenestration.
Because it really is no big deal
Just a minor transition.
Unless in some little dark corner of your mind is doubt, and a quiet nagging fear that is really is the end.?
So9
Where will the Memorial be placed?
RE: "Before Terri and Michael Schiavo married, they had to get a Special dispensation from the Church because Michael was not Catholic. This means he had to agree to never prevent her from worhship, practicing her faith or from receiving the sacraments.
Seems like he reneged on his pledge."
That he did. I will not even pretend to be the best Christian out there (or even a very good one, at that), but I do know that the kind of man who would stand between a disabled woman and her God is the kind of man I despise. Michael should at least respect her religious beliefs and honor her wishes.
Instead he has apparently chosen to kill her against her will, and the courts (esp. that little thug Judge Greer) have decided to give him that authority. My head aches just thinking about the crud I used to believe about this being a "free" country, where people could choose their own path in life for themselves without the interference of an all-knowing big government.
I wuz gonna say...
However, rumors of the death of my wit have been greatly exaggerated. Or not.
"Otherwise, we're all doomed to "subjective relativity" from wholly subjective relatives. Not good."
Make sure you check your state's laws....in MO:
'Living wills do have limitations. They apply only to near death situations in which the patient will die shortly without medical intervention. Missouri law prohibits a living will from being used to withhold or withdraw artificially supplied nutrition and hydration. To give instructions beyond what a living will allows, complete a health care choices directive.'
MO has a 'LifeChoices' website via the MO AG office, complete with living will and advance directives forms, found here:
http://www.ago.mo.gov/publications/lifechoices/lifechoices.htm
Make sure your wishes are properly represented.
I, AmishDude, finder of fact, do not find him credible. More credible is the testimony that the second you are unconscious, you want to be put out of your misery and give your entire estate to AmishDude.
This is a fact. I have found so.
Now, just to wait for sleep...
Well, now it looks like we have to.
BTW, get any Privacy Policies in the mail lately?
Steven Wright?
Wait, that sounds more like Emo Phillips.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.