Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Light may arise from relativity violations
Indiana University ^ | 22 March 2005 | Press release

Posted on 03/22/2005 3:40:06 PM PST by PatrickHenry

Light as we know it may be a direct result of small violations of relativity, according to new research scheduled for publication online Tuesday (March 22) in the journal Physical Review D. [Preprint is here.]

In discussing the work, physics professor Alan Kostelecky of Indiana University described light as "a shimmering of ever-present vectors in empty space" and compared it to waves propagating across a field of grain. This description is markedly different from existing theories of light, in which scientists believe space is without direction and the properties of light are a result of an underlying symmetry of nature.

Instead the report, co-authored by Kostelecky with physics professor Robert Bluhm of Colby College, discusses the possibility that light arises from the breaking of a symmetry of relativity. "Nature's beauty is more subtle than perfect symmetry," Kostelecky said. "The underlying origin of light may be another example of this subtlety."

The new results show that this description of light is a general feature of relativity violations and holds both in empty space and in the presence of gravity. "In this picture, light has a strange beauty, and its origin is tied into minuscule violations of Einstein's relativity in a profound and general way," Kostelecky said.

The report also points out that this new view of light can be tested experimentally by studying the properties of light and its interactions with matter and gravity. All these have behavior that is predicted to deviate from conventional expectations in tiny but important ways.

"This is an alternative, viable way of understanding light with potential experimental implications. That's what makes it exciting," Kostelecky said.

Possible detectable effects include asymmetries between properties of certain particles and antiparticles, and cyclic variations in their behavior as Earth rotates. The effects can be sought using various experimental equipment ranging from giant particle colliders, such as the one at Fermilab in Illinois, to "tabletop" experiments with atomic clocks or resonant cavities. A number of such experiments are now under way.

[The original article, at the end, lists the people involved in this work, and their contact information.]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: light; physics; relativity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Physicist

Thanks, doc . . . It's an amazing place we live in!


41 posted on 03/22/2005 6:22:32 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
As I recall reading their experiment neither proved or disproved the existence of ether, rather that there was no ether wind. Pro and anti-neutrinos are just itching to interact.
42 posted on 03/22/2005 6:34:34 PM PST by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Whatever the means by which light arises it cannot be a 'violation' of something which doesn't exist, even if it were recently thought to exist. That assumes the experiments bear out this theory.

That's what I was thinking. A poor word choice.


43 posted on 03/22/2005 6:41:39 PM PST by spinestein ( "I thought I knew everything. I didn't get it. I'm here to say I was totally wrong." --B. Boxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
The instruments are made from large, resonant cavities.

Let's see if we can get Teddy Kennedy's skull when he croaks.


44 posted on 03/22/2005 6:43:42 PM PST by Nick Danger (You can stick a fork in the Mullahs... they're done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Physicist

I actually understood some of the words with more than 4 letters.

Man. I hope Physicists have as much trouble deciphering molecular biology as I has with this.

In the meantime, I will have to defer judgment to Senor Physicist and his ilk, but it will help when some experimental data are generated.

Now my head hurts.


45 posted on 03/22/2005 6:46:59 PM PST by furball4paws (Ho, Ho, Beri, Beri and Balls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Why wait? The advancement of humanity is at stake..


46 posted on 03/22/2005 7:18:25 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Help me! See #36.


47 posted on 03/22/2005 8:01:38 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

What exactly is supposed to be violating relativity? It certainly isn't the speed of light, b/c it seems hard to think that that could be the source of light itself? Is it areas of space-time which don't have the curvature that one would expect under special relativity?


48 posted on 03/22/2005 8:05:02 PM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

WARNING: Relativity Violations are known to the State of California to cause cancer.


49 posted on 03/22/2005 8:05:13 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlr

What I think is fascinating is the concept of interdigitating supersymmetry and it's implications for quantum gravity. I thnk it could easily lead to a new hermaneutic with certain heuristic properties.

I could be wrong, though.


50 posted on 03/22/2005 8:16:29 PM PST by JusPasenThru (http://giinthesky.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


51 posted on 03/22/2005 8:35:17 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

It wouldn't be a very stable mount for the optics; soft and mushy in some parts, too thick in others...


52 posted on 03/22/2005 10:06:36 PM PST by Redcloak (There is no "I" in team. But then again, there is no "us" in it either. There is "meat" however.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

A ten-kilowatt laser would seem to be a bit more than a "shimmering"; let alone the output of a star.


53 posted on 03/23/2005 1:28:05 AM PST by boris (The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a leftist with a word processor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv; RadioAstronomer; Focault's Pendulum; zygoat
"Light may arise from relativity exceptions" or perhaps "Light may arise from relativity distortions"..

..given the amount of "light matter" vs the amount of "dark matter" out there...Interesting article. and the "mini maglite as a relativity violator" :^)

54 posted on 03/23/2005 7:55:30 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Naah. Not Darkons, Hardons.

Full Disclosure: Back in the dark ages (reference to Darkons, there, get it?), I first ran across the term hadron and misread it as "hardon".

Being an immature adolescent I couldn't stop giggling for *days*.

Naturally, this is the kind of thing that I couldn't explain to anyone at the time...

Cheers!

55 posted on 03/23/2005 9:21:39 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

slow vectors down? Vectors are only a form of expression for multiple-dimensional forces and whatnot.


56 posted on 04/02/2005 12:45:15 PM PST by oneofthem ([www.teencritics.com/forums])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"a shimmering of ever-present vectors in empty space"

Now that makes it perfectly clear!

57 posted on 10/09/2005 8:30:17 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Bush's fault.
58 posted on 10/09/2005 8:48:36 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson