Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Raises Enlistment Age for Reservists to 39
reuteurs ^ | Mar 21 | na

Posted on 03/22/2005 3:56:04 AM PST by Flavius

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Army, stung by recruiting shortfalls caused by the Iraq (news - web sites) war, has raised the maximum age for new recruits for the part-time Army Reserve and National Guard by five years to 39, officials said on Monday.

The Army said the move, a three-year experiment, will add about 22 million people to the pool of those eligible to serve, from about 60 million now. Physical standards will not be relaxed for older recruits, who the Army said were valued for their maturity and patriotism.

The Pentagon (news - web sites) has relied heavily on part-time Army Reserve and Army National Guard soldiers summoned from civilian life to maintain troop levels in Iraq and Afghanistan (news - web sites). Roughly 45 percent of U.S. troops currently deployed for those wars are reservists.

At home, the all-volunteer Army has labored to coax potential recruits to volunteer for the Guard and Reserve as well as for active-duty, and to persuade current soldiers to re-enlist when their volunteer commitment ends.

Maj. Elizabeth Robbins, an Army spokeswoman, said the maximum enlistment age for the regular Army will remain 34. While congressional action was not needed to raise the age for the Guard and Reserve, Robbins said, Congress must approve any change for the active-duty force.

"Raising the maximum age for non-prior service enlistment expands the recruiting pool, provides motivated individuals an opportunity to serve, and strengthens the readiness of Reserve units," the Army said in a statement.

Air Force Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said it was possible after the three-year test ends in September 2008 that the Pentagon may consider an enlistment age for Army reservists even older than 39.

RECRUITING GOALS

Recruiters say the Iraq war is making military service a harder sell, and the Army has added recruiters and financial incentives for enlistment.

The Army National Guard missed its recruiting goal for the 2004 fiscal year and trails its year-to-date 2005 targets. The Army Reserve missed January and February goals and is lagging its target for 2005. The regular Army missed its target for February and trails its annual goal.

"Obviously, this decision is being made partly in response to the personnel shortfalls caused by the war in Iraq," said defense analyst Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute.

But he said U.S. life expectancy increased by 40 percent in the 20th century, adding, "The pressure of wartime has pushed the Army to make a change that may have been overdue anyway."

"Anecdotally, our recruiters have been telling us for years that we've had people who are otherwise qualified but over the age limit who have attempted to enlist," Robbins said. "There are physically fit, health-conscious individuals who can make a positive contribution to our national defense."

The Army said the policy applies to men and women, and older recruits must meet the same physical standards and pass the same medical examination as everyone else.

"Experience has shown that older recruits who can meet the physical demands of military service generally make excellent soldiers based on their maturity, motivation, loyalty and patriotism," the Army said.

Krenke said the change was first considered last fall and approved by the Pentagon last week. She said the Marines, Navy and Air Force had not requested a similar change.

The Army Reserve is made up of federal soldiers who can be mobilized from civilian life for active duty. National Guard soldiers also serve under the control of state governors for roles like disaster relief in their home states.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: reservists; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Flavius
The problem with this is that in the 4 1/2 years since 9/11, those who were within this increased enlistment age limit and were turned away due to being "too old" are still deemed too old and turned away.
21 posted on 03/22/2005 6:58:29 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
It's too bad it came to this, but the personnel shortage is on the brink of disaster. It's a shame that the military didn't fix retention at the right end, and instead is just looking to pull more people off the streets in the hope they stay in long enough to be replaced. Even that's a losing strategy, but at least its sustainable.

Unfortunately, nobody will realize this until several years have past. The worst to come out of this, is the loss of institutional knowledge. That's something that is very hard to measure, and I'm sure it probably hurt us in some way in Iraq (I'm referring to the cuts Clinton made, where a lot of people retired early or left earlier than they would have, and took a lot of knowledge with them). With a further loss of institutional knowledge, it will definitely hurt us down the road.

The military needs to work harder on retaining the people it already has.
22 posted on 03/22/2005 5:38:54 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd
Imagine a young troop putting a 40 year old at attention and screaming at him when his barracks doesn't pass inspection.

Putting aside the fact that most 40 year olds who are motivated enough to go through something like this are probably a helluva lot more responsible and mature than an 18 or 19 year old going through basic, they would have to be dealt with in other ways.

Screaming in somebody's face isn't going to do a damn thing to somebody who's been married for more than a few years ;-) (and here comes the flames from the ladies)
23 posted on 03/22/2005 5:43:45 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Flavius; Mama_Bear; Howlin; onyx; Old Sarge; All

AWESOME! Next step: raise the army's active duty age requirement to 39 or 40 a.s.a.p.


24 posted on 03/23/2005 3:17:31 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to be as shamless for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Mama_Bear; shield; lara; Jim Robinson; notpoliticallycorewrecked; JustAmy; FresnoArmyBrat; ...
This is a terrific first step in line with my earlier thread. click on the following link: Open letter to Bush, Congress, Rush, Hannity, and Freepers re military age requirments.
25 posted on 03/23/2005 4:37:46 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to be as shamless for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tame

Raise it to 51 and I'm back in.


26 posted on 03/23/2005 4:39:28 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (dot dot dot dash dash dash dot dot dot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
Raise it to 51 and I'm back in.

yep, we've got more work to do.

27 posted on 03/23/2005 4:40:31 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to be as shamless for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tame

yes, tame.. I recall your zeal 2 years ago...I too would not mind doing my share but they have to bump those years considerably. No I could NOT keep up or match the physical condition of the 19 year olds.. but there are many administrative things we could do & free up the young healthy dudes & gals who can be on the field.

OTOH...there are very few people I know 25 years younger than myself who can keep up with me... so I guess everything is relative


28 posted on 03/23/2005 4:48:10 AM PST by DollyCali (Terri... we care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: knarf
I've been accused of being a perfect idiot (I'd like to go airborne ... ),

If you're a perfect idiot, you might qualify as an airborne officer! ;^)

29 posted on 03/23/2005 4:51:17 AM PST by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali
OTOH...there are very few people I know 25 years younger than myself who can keep up with me

thank goodness for that :o)

30 posted on 03/23/2005 4:52:03 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to be as shamless for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I'm not sure how they do it in the Reserves, but having been discharged from the Guard in 1992, I looked a few years ago at reenlisting and asked if I would have to go back through Basic and AIT. I was told that anybody who's already been through Basic or bootcamp is exempt. Not sure if that's really true or not, but it did make sense. I don't know very many vets who would want to go through it again. Personally, I know I couldn't put up with the screaming, physical, and mental BS like I did when I was 17.

As it is, given the fact I have a bad back and arthritic knee, there's no way I could pass the physical just to enlist.


31 posted on 03/23/2005 4:55:00 AM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) (From Roe v Wade to Terri Schiavo, the RATS have become a death cult...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tame

I'm 41+, I was just tested using the USAFs latest P.T. standards (the USAF has by far the easiest).
Anyways, here I am, a 41 year old getting tested on sit-ups, push-ups, and a run. I got thinking about my 40+ year old friends I grew-up with and where they were/are in their careers. Just a perspective....


32 posted on 03/23/2005 4:58:44 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tame

I'm in excellent health and mean as a snake. I'd sweep floors or fight on the front line. But recruiters laugh at 51 year olds even with prior service.


33 posted on 03/23/2005 5:06:47 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (dot dot dot dash dash dash dot dot dot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Actually I was borderline then, and am borderline now.

I think I may inquire about this.


34 posted on 03/23/2005 5:30:58 AM PST by eyespysomething (It starts off as a drum circle, next thing you know you've got a college.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

e2,
My guess would be to use the older recruits as examples for the younger ones.

Drill sergeants are alot of things, but dumb ain't one of them. They will recognize the best way to both teach the older recruit what he needs to know, as well as utilize the same recruit's knowledge to best effect.

BTW, does anyone else still get a little nervous at the sight of a "brown round" coming your way?


35 posted on 03/23/2005 5:43:35 AM PST by Gefreiter (When seconds count, the police are minutes away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
" My guess would be to use the older recruits as examples for the younger ones"

That would be about my guess too. If for no other reason than it’s the easiest thing to do.

36 posted on 03/23/2005 6:03:31 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

They raised the age...

Why would the army want a 33yr old husband and father of 2(4yr and 3 week old)?


37 posted on 03/23/2005 7:10:01 AM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tame

Thanks for the ping! Interesting news.


38 posted on 03/23/2005 7:17:27 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Why does your comment sound sarcastic?

The raising of the age cap gives older former military members ,that got out during the Clinton years ,an opportunity to serve their country again.

My husband just signed up to rejoin the Army ,after finding out about the raise in age ,he is 39 and welcomes the opportunity to serve his Country once again and I am proud of him!

He would have done it sooner ,but the age cap didn't allow it!


39 posted on 03/23/2005 7:18:52 AM PST by Mrs.Nooseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter
My guess would be to use the older recruits as examples for the younger ones.

That would probably be the best way to do so, since the instructors would know that instinctively, the younger recruits would look upto the older recruits.
40 posted on 03/23/2005 7:18:53 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson