Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC:The truth on bar smoking ban
Times Argus ^ | 3-4-05 | Amy McCloskey

Posted on 03/06/2005 7:57:33 AM PST by SheLion

In reference to the story "Smoking ban for bars on Legislative agenda" on Feb. 14 by John Zicconi, all I can say is "Hogwash."

I own a successful bar in Greenwich Village. In 2004, we were voted the Best Lounge in New York by CitySearch. My business is down 30 percent since 2002. Since nothing has changed but the smoking ban, I can attribute this precipitous drop to nothing else.

It's remarkable to read that "A New York City official on Thursday will travel to Vermont to testify that Big Apple pub receipts have increased 12 percent since the city's ban went into affect in 2003" since not even Mayor Bloomberg has been able to wrestle the actual statistic for bars ONLY out of the state's finance department. The information they're peddling combines tax receipts for bars and restaurants — including places like McDonalds and Starbucks. This is like comparing a wolf to a Shih Tzu; anyone with any sense knows they're completely different beasts.

New York officials are doing their level best to cover up the fact that for many small businesses the smoking ban is an unmitigated disaster. They say that compliance is at 98 percent. That's such utter nonsense I don't even know where to begin. They say that no one is hurting, using tax information that cannot possibly represent the truth, while fines for noise complaints and capricious health code violations slowly pick away at our sanity.

All I can say is this: I'm a life-long non-smoker and I hated the way my bar smelled. I, too, figured that I'd wait and see. That it couldn't be THAT bad. I've had to cut eight staff, the ones left work fewer hours, and I haven't taken a paycheck since August. It's that bad.

The pub owners in Vermont need to pull their heads out of the sand in time to save themselves. Or, like us, they'll be fighting for their livelihoods while their plight is actively ignored by those who might help.

This includes, by the way, the media, which seems to have jumped onto the no-smoking bandwagon with both feet and no regard for journalistic integrity. Frankly, I'd be surprised if an opposing viewpoint ever sees the light of day.

Amy McCloskey New York, N.Y.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: addiction; antismokers; asthma; bans; butts; cigarettes; fda; individualliberty; lawmakers; maine; niconazis; professional; prohibitionists; pufflist; regulation; rinos; senate; smoking; smokingbans; stench; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: Senator Pardek
Here's to Spring Training BTW:


101 posted on 03/07/2005 7:04:25 PM PST by Neets (Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

bump


102 posted on 03/07/2005 7:07:36 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neets

That's a joke, right?


103 posted on 03/07/2005 7:08:51 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

=== Insulting those who fail to get your point,


It's true ... I failed miserably to keep to the civil and courteous tone established in SheLion's discourse with me.

Forgive me? I so want "these people" who have no clue what Askel5 is to like me.


104 posted on 03/07/2005 7:09:50 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

You don't like Sam?

Bud?

Michelob?


105 posted on 03/07/2005 7:10:34 PM PST by Neets (Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Neets

Which makes her posts not worth a damn in so many ways. :-)


106 posted on 03/07/2005 7:12:45 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Sam Adams = Boston.

Grrrrr.

107 posted on 03/07/2005 7:13:01 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Here's a little gem from Minnesota:

As I walked into the hospital (to go to work) I actually stopped and read the sign regarding their "smoking" policy. The sign reads: "The hospital does not permit the use of tobacco PRODUCTS on these premises".

I thought it was all about the harmful effects of second hand smoke. If I'm dipping or chewing I sure as he!! am not emitting second hand smoke. It's all about controlling your behavior, hence your freedom to do said behavior.

I'm a doctor, and yes I do smoke. My cigars, and an occasional cigarette (well, more than occasionally...a pack every two weeks or more). My pipe is always at my side in the boat fishing. So, yes I smoke and I know the risks.

This is getting out of hand. If I wanted to dip, no body would know it. What are they going to do slap it out of my mouth...they would TRY that once, just once.

108 posted on 03/07/2005 7:14:08 PM PST by timydnuc (I'll die on my feet before I'll live on my knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

Well DUH!!!

I didn't even relate the two.

Sheesh, should I swear off the whole line or just the Spring and Summer blends?

Damn, guess I'll stick to Gin.


109 posted on 03/07/2005 7:15:09 PM PST by Neets (Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Neets
"I didn't even relate the two."

That's the prob with you upstate hillbillies...

110 posted on 03/07/2005 7:18:37 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Askel5

Nah!

I kinda like joshing with her and pulling her chain and she knows I don't mean any harm towards her.


111 posted on 03/07/2005 7:18:41 PM PST by Neets (Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

I got yer "upstate hillbillies" raht here.

Don't forget you aren't exactly city folk yerself.

I should really end this because I have to be to work early, REMEMBER?

LOL.


112 posted on 03/07/2005 7:19:54 PM PST by Neets (Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Neets
I got yer "upstate hillbillies" raht here.

Oh yeah - where?

New Paltz?

113 posted on 03/07/2005 7:36:14 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

Reckon so. ;)


114 posted on 03/07/2005 7:37:19 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

LOL no, not quite.

I wouldn't go near there even if you were to show up.


115 posted on 03/07/2005 7:37:28 PM PST by Neets (Proudly posting at 4'11" since '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Neets

Even if I asked you to be the Maid Of Honor?!


116 posted on 03/07/2005 7:44:40 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Neets

Okay....whatever works for you! :-)


117 posted on 03/07/2005 8:15:40 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

Comment #118 Removed by Moderator

To: gidget7
KY? is this new? I was down there this past summer and was asked in every restaurant we went to "smoking or non"

Is what new?  KY is taxing smokers to balance the state budget, but smoking sections are still available throughout the state.


119 posted on 03/08/2005 5:19:22 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: timydnuc
Here's a little gem from Minnesota:

Minnesota has the worst anti's in the Union.  I don't know how people can stand listening to the Partnership for a Tobacco Free Minnesota.  And they are using smoker's tax dollars to ban, control and restrict people who smoke in that state.

As I walked into the hospital (to go to work) I actually stopped and read the sign regarding their "smoking" policy. The sign reads: "The hospital does not permit the use of tobacco PRODUCTS on these premises".

I thought it was all about the harmful effects of second hand smoke. If I'm dipping or chewing I sure as he!! am not emitting second hand smoke. It's all about controlling your behavior, hence your freedom to do said behavior.

This is getting out of hand. If I wanted to dip, no body would know it. What are they going to do slap it out of my mouth...they would TRY that once, just once.

Maine forced a smoking ban in the hospitals as well.  But I had to go this past October to visit a patient, and the people are once again smoking outside. The Paramedics were standing outside their bus smoking.  And visitors were standing outside the hospital entrance having a cigarette.  I went to my vehicle and sat there to have a cigarette.  But there are no security guards and who is to enforce it?

120 posted on 03/08/2005 5:28:26 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson