Posted on 03/05/2005 8:55:16 AM PST by C from Dallas
I am a newcomer to this posting board, but was directed to the site by a friend after my first experience with the North Texas Protest Warriors this past week. I was one of the volunteers at the Dallas City Hall exposition of Eyes Wide Open, where they made a noisy appearance.
The Eyes Wide Open exhibit laid out a pair of combat boots in memory of every fallen American soldier in Iraq, as well as shoes to represent Iraqi civilian casualties. By the time the memorial left Dallas there were 1,499 pairs of boots on display, and the 1,000 pairs of shoes represented scarcely a tenth of Iraq's estimated losses. The exhibit was not a protest; it was not meant to exploit the soldiers' deaths for any political agenda; it was not meant to be provocative; the intention, whatever one's feelings on the war, was to encourage a frank appreciation of its human costs.
The American Friends Service Committee, which sponsored Eyes Wide Open, is a Quaker group, and therefore is obviously a pacifist organization. (Perhaps now would be the appropriate time to disclose that I am a Quaker, myself.) Pacifism was one of Jesus' central teachings (Matthew 5:7-9, 5:38-39, 22:39; Luke 22:50-52), and Quakers consider war to be an immoral act, regardless of who undertakes it or what their intentions. Anyone who reads any literature about war, from Crane to Kipling to Heller, acknowledges that it is brutal and dehumanizing in the ever-evocative words of Sherman, that it is all hell. The question of a just war is debatable-and I would gladly take the issue up with anyone who would like to discuss it-but, for me, a basic question remains: with all of the other immorality in the world, with all the attacks on family values and our national character, why would anyone so venomously oppose a religious group acting on their conscience and the teachings of the Bible?
At the event, this question got a range of answers from the protesters. Here were the most frequent responses:
o They claimed that the AFSC website called American troops war criminals. It never did.
o They said that we were liars because the boots did not come from Iraq. Again, we never claimed that they did. (Although it seems irrelevant where the boots came from; the message is the same.)
o They yelled that the AFSC hates the troops. It is amazing that in the thirty years since Vietnam, so many people have been unable to negotiate the distinction between opposing the war and hating the troops. For most objectors, it is compassion for the troops that breeds opposition to the war.
The point is that none of the protesters present had actually read or asked about the purpose of the exhibit. Rather, they listened to a conservative talk show on the local AM radio station and spurious postings on several websites like this one, and heard all they needed to know. You talk about disrespecting the troops? The result was a self-righteous mob crashing the exhibit, shouting obscenities and cynical political statements, grandstanding in the middle of a metaphorical graveyard. (Several of the exhibit's supporters-though none of its staff-got engaged in this as well, and are equally guilty.) The crowd smugly refused to show any respect for its opponents' right to address the media: at the press conference protesters blocked the podium until moved by the police, and shouted down all of the AFSC speakers, with the exception of one bereaved, misguided Marine mother, who received only grumbles.
After the press conference, I took the podium with a sixteen-year-old exchange student from Morocco and proceeded to read the names of those who have died in the Iraq conflict. I worked through the names of the American soldiers by state, occasionally pausing for him to read the names of dead Iraqi families. Behind us, hecklers shouted at every pause, and answered each American name with the phrase died for freedom- whereas all the Iraqi casualties were killed by their own people, killed by the terrorists or by my partner's A-rab friends. Every time he read, the crowd jeered racial insults. When I took a sip of water, they yelled that my throat was dry with lies, whereas they spoke the untiring truth. (Which men's names were lies they failed to mention; I also struggled to determine which of the racial slurs were true.) The heckling continued through the state of Florida or so, and I was looking forward to a long afternoon of back-and-forth with the protesters, but then they left soon after the cameras did
The rest of the day was spent in silent reflection-which, as Quakers, delighted us-interrupted only by visitors with questions or words of grief. Some of the gold-star mothers took the time to explore the exhibit, and returned the next day with thanks and oblique apologies, acknowledging that they had misunderstood its intentions. In fact, it now seems that few protesters had any lucid, accurate reason for being there at all. However, there are several moral questions surrounding the exhibit, which some postings on this sight have raised! Let me offer possible answers to them:
1) Several postings ask whether the AFSC acted in poor taste by showing Eyes Wide Open, or whether such displays needlessly sap morale among our servicemen.
Is it more decorous to obscure the soldiers' deaths (the president avoiding military funerals, barring photographs of returning coffins, etc.) than to honor them with frank acknowledgement? Eyes Wide Open is not a protest exhibit; it is merely a memorial. Every visitor is welcome, no matter what their feelings on the war, and after taking account of its human cost, can leave with their views unchanged. The AFSC is not manipulating the numbers of dead (other than to grossly under-represent the Iraqis killed), and is offering Americans a chance to really connect with the nation's loss, which many of them apathetically ignore. Given the disconnect between front-line suffering and home-front complacency, I don't understand why the military's morale would suffer from that candor.
2) Other postings oppose the use of servicemen's names without family consent.
All servicemen's names are public record, and are freely used to validate the righteousness" of the war (even in blatantly exploitative political contexts), so the AFSC is completely within its legal and moral bounds to use them in a memorial setting. However, the exhibit always removes any soldier's name at the request of his/her next of kin. One Gold Star Mother indignantly said that she hadn't known about her son's inclusion, and that the exhibit would not remove his name at her request. (She neglected to mention that the rest of her family adamantly supported the soldier's inclusion, going so far as to bring pictures, flowers, and his real boots.) Before Eyes Wide Open arrived in Dallas, we informed local veteran and family groups about its purpose and the option of removing soldiers' names. I apologize if we did not disseminate that information quickly enough, but it was not for lack of effort.
Perhaps these last two points do not convince. That is fine. Please come out and quietly protest them the next time this exhibit comes to town. However-and I don't want to sound hopelessly naïve here-is it possible to negotiate political differences without hate-mongering, self-flattery, and bigotry? Or is that the mission of the Protest Warriors?
Sincerely, C. from Dallas
***Lastly, as a brief aside: I thought the Dallas police acted terribly at the opening of the exhibit. They had no control over the situation, did not show any caution for public safety and order, and did not guarantee the exhibit basic courtesies of domain. If that was because of some kind of police prejudice against the exhibit, then all the conservatives posting here can agree that their inaction was obviously unjust and un-American, and should probably write their city councilmen on our behalf. However, I do not put much stock in conspiracy theories, so the mayhem was more likely a sign of general incompetence on the police's part, in which case all the Protest Warriors out there should still write in and demand more action. After all, who knows if their next event won't be overrun be ill-mannered liberal rioters, bombarding them with Birkenstocks?***
Hi "C".
Trolling around, eh?
10, 9, 8, 7........
Meow?
What's the matter..you lefties can't take the heat. Want the evil police to protect you from protesters. Now that takes nerve. <p. Face it, you hate freedom. and the last thing any of you wanted to see was a free Iraq. Pathetic.
What's your real reason for registering on FR?
What's amazing is that you spit in the face of those brave men who fought for our country's independence so YOU can sit there at your computer dissing the USA...freely.
I don't know; can you? Judging from your post, you can't...
A point. That's it, a point would be helpful.
I see "C from Dallas" is gone but his memory lives on.

I thought he had a point.
C from Dallas didn't last very long at all! Awwwww....
Should we close our police departments if a policeman gets killed on duty, or if a civilian accidentally dies in crossfire between criminals and police? No.
There are other dangerous occupations, such as logging and commercial fishing. The risk of death is a part of life. Those who die while risking their lives for their country and the freedom of people around the world should be honored for their sacrifice, not used as props to dishonor their quest.
Yes, but look, Saddam got 100 percent of the vote, his people LOVED him! /s
I'd also like to ask where the protesters are for each person who is murdered in our cities each day?
Our soldiers, sailors,marines and airman are prepared to die defending our citizen's right to free speech. I wish I could have been there to honor their sacrifice by doing what little I could to protect these individuals God given right to liberty.
from one of the Marine mom groups. Janet Norwood (later in post) is the mom who was at the Inauguration.
I apologize for the length of this post, but thot background info
was important first. The first two posts are from MMO Proboards to
let you know how a couple of Gold Star Moms feel. Then at the
bottom is what the DFW Marine Corps Families is trying to accomplish
to help them out.
Sharon Brown
PMM of LCpl Brown (deployed with OIF)
I've always thought it was wrong to use the deaths of those who died for something they believed in, to propagandize against it.
Of course, DPD are warmongers, a lot of them being reservists, and all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.