Skip to comments.
Men(ace) in Black? SCOTUS goes Rogue...
various FR links & stories
| 03-03-05
| the heavy equipment guy
Posted on 03/03/2005 3:35:05 AM PST by backhoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Folks, we all need to write, and telephone, our (ahem!) Representatives in DC ( and maybe your state capitols, too ) and inform them that if they wish to stay employed, they need to rein in this rogue court. Quickly.
1
posted on
03/03/2005 3:35:05 AM PST
by
backhoe
To: ml/nj
2
posted on
03/03/2005 3:43:38 AM PST
by
upier
(Stop Child abuse - Teach your children English!)
To: backhoe
When the black robed set becomes more tyrannical at an ever increasing rate, and when it writes laws day after day, how much longer before vigilantism follows it down the road.
Someone should ask these people what the result is likely to be when we can no longer trust judges.
3
posted on
03/03/2005 3:49:31 AM PST
by
stevem
To: backhoe
Andrew Jackson knew the truth that the SCOTUS had no power to impliment their rulings.
4
posted on
03/03/2005 3:51:26 AM PST
by
Vaquero
To: stevem; Vaquero
5
posted on
03/03/2005 3:52:42 AM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
6
posted on
03/03/2005 3:56:47 AM PST
by
IPWGOP
(I'm Linda Eddy, and I approved this message... 'tooning the truth!)
To: backhoe
Nationwide judicial term limits of 10 years and then you are out would go a long way to get the seniles out.
7
posted on
03/03/2005 4:00:36 AM PST
by
tkathy
(Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
To: backhoe
I don't think they care either.
8
posted on
03/03/2005 4:09:34 AM PST
by
johnb838
("You Have Ruled, Now Let Us See You Enforce" Need some wood?)
To: Vaquero
"You Have Ruled, Now Let Us See You Enforce"
Need some wood?
9
posted on
03/03/2005 4:10:24 AM PST
by
johnb838
("You Have Ruled, Now Let Us See You Enforce" Need some wood?)
To: johnb838
10
posted on
03/03/2005 4:17:45 AM PST
by
Vaquero
To: backhoe
The impeachment is interesting, but it says technically. To get these anti-Constitution Supremes removed it would take a lot more than a simple technicality.
11
posted on
03/03/2005 4:23:41 AM PST
by
marty60
To: stevem
What do you mean no longer. The last real uprising against an outragous Judge was the removal of Rose Bird in CA. Would never happen today.
12
posted on
03/03/2005 4:26:03 AM PST
by
marty60
To: Vaquero; backhoe
Not just Jackson. IIRC, Lincoln carried an arrest warrant for Chief Justice Roger Tanney in his pocket for about six months, "just in case."
13
posted on
03/03/2005 4:42:59 AM PST
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: All
14
posted on
03/03/2005 10:44:37 AM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: IPWGOP
To: All
16
posted on
03/03/2005 11:16:23 AM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
17
posted on
03/03/2005 11:26:25 AM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
18
posted on
03/03/2005 12:36:41 PM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
Just in case you are feeling apathetic?
"They" ( that's right, de govermint... ) is seeking to silence us:
19
posted on
03/03/2005 12:39:54 PM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
20
posted on
03/04/2005 12:01:29 AM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
