Folks, we all need to write, and telephone, our (ahem!) Representatives in DC ( and maybe your state capitols, too ) and inform them that if they wish to stay employed, they need to rein in this rogue court. Quickly.
1 posted on
03/03/2005 3:35:05 AM PST by
backhoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: ml/nj
2 posted on
03/03/2005 3:43:38 AM PST by
upier
(Stop Child abuse - Teach your children English!)
To: backhoe
When the black robed set becomes more tyrannical at an ever increasing rate, and when it writes laws day after day, how much longer before vigilantism follows it down the road.
Someone should ask these people what the result is likely to be when we can no longer trust judges.
3 posted on
03/03/2005 3:49:31 AM PST by
stevem
To: backhoe
Andrew Jackson knew the truth that the SCOTUS had no power to impliment their rulings.
4 posted on
03/03/2005 3:51:26 AM PST by
Vaquero
To: backhoe
Nationwide judicial term limits of 10 years and then you are out would go a long way to get the seniles out.
7 posted on
03/03/2005 4:00:36 AM PST by
tkathy
(Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
To: backhoe
I don't think they care either.
8 posted on
03/03/2005 4:09:34 AM PST by
johnb838
("You Have Ruled, Now Let Us See You Enforce" Need some wood?)
To: backhoe
The impeachment is interesting, but it says technically. To get these anti-Constitution Supremes removed it would take a lot more than a simple technicality.
11 posted on
03/03/2005 4:23:41 AM PST by
marty60
To: All
14 posted on
03/03/2005 10:44:37 AM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
16 posted on
03/03/2005 11:16:23 AM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
18 posted on
03/03/2005 12:36:41 PM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
20 posted on
03/04/2005 12:01:29 AM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
21 posted on
03/04/2005 2:03:34 PM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
22 posted on
03/04/2005 4:25:36 PM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
23 posted on
03/05/2005 4:08:22 AM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
24 posted on
03/07/2005 2:03:37 PM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
28 posted on
03/31/2005 3:30:19 PM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
29 posted on
05/02/2005 2:07:22 AM PDT by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
30 posted on
05/24/2005 1:35:46 AM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an Undocumented Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
To: All
33 posted on
05/27/2005 4:30:57 AM PDT by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: All
34 posted on
06/23/2005 9:52:34 AM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
To: All
A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT (PROPERTY RIGHTS) -- I'm thinking this doesn't fall along the lines of your classic liberal or conservative definition in who is outraged. I've found tons with liberal ideas on some topics (abortion, gay rights, etc) are equally outraged over this as your "traditional" conservatives. There's some sort of weird division going on here, IMO...
35 posted on
06/23/2005 12:15:11 PM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson