Posted on 02/26/2005 1:27:31 PM PST by srm913
You allowed yourself to be manipulated emotionally by a leftist rag that intended to manipulate you emotionally, by repeating their lie that the Keyes' had broken off all communication with their daughter, and used that lie to propagate a hyper-emotional line of rhetoric, in which you continued to charge the Keyes's with non-communication, and condemned them based on a lie.
No mamm, it's not my reading comprehension that is ascew, it is yours, to the point of being a pawn for the homosexual agenda and leftist agenda.
Frankly mamm, you should be ashamed.
"Your last statement is your own biased characterization, which in reality is a mischaracterization. Everything was not "copacetic" as you claim.
Once again, her dishonoring her parents was enough to bring discipline in itself.
Disagreeing politically is not dishonoring. See below re lesbianism.
>"I realize that the Bible carries no weight with you,...<
ad hominem...show me where I said that
>"Ok, so you don't like Alan Keyes response. This is still America and he is free to respond in the manner that his faith and conscience dictates."<
And I am free to highlight his hypocrisy. As in, also, his "that was then and this is now" comment about carpetbaggers that Heisenberg posted.
Had there been evidence that he was responding immediately and clearly to the lesbian behavior, I wouldn't be posting. The evidence, though, does not support that.
As I suspected, reading comprehension isn't your thing.
You obviously haven't understood the many posts I've made that point out the transcript which directly contradicts the article.
I know you're new here, but really, try reading a little more carefully in the future.
Oh boy, I'm really sceered now. LOL
People who can't read and make asinine posts like yours don't last long. They can't stand the heat. You sound like a blowhard.
What she did was not a simple matter of "disagreeing politically", what she did was to join in an agenda that is in opposition to everything her parents stand for, being used by that agenda because of her name and who her parents are, charging her parents with lies and distortions and being militant and defiant against her parents, while accepting their shelter, food, protection, payment of her education, etc......that is what was dishonoring.
You are free to state your opinion as well, but your opinion is not equal to truth, no matter how much you may wish it to be.
Which time were you being honest?
Btw, what god do you believe in?
I've asked that before, as well as other queries, but you don't seem to be interested in genuine dialog. Your interest seems to be in whining and bashing Alan Keyes and Bible believing Christians after being emotionally manipulated by the lies of the homosexual agenda and the leftist rag the Guardian.
So, which god do you believe in?
In other words, back up your assertions.
Mamm, please begin to study the Bible in context instead of relying on your liberal religion.
Last I heard she had not "charged her parents with lies and distortions"
She's a political activist.. like her father.
Is is your position that the offspring of a politically active Democrat should never decide to work publically for Republicans? Never say the parents' positions on, say, second amendment rights or the war on terror, are wrong?
Life is too short for 'words'...
..May we agree to disagree and let it go.
You have your opinion and I have mine.
You see mamm, I don't believe you are able to support any dogmatic assertion you have made here.
addendum to response:
Ten minutes more and I will be logging off. Family's home.
She made her bed. Now she has to sleep in it.
May God shine His face down upon you and give you peace.
And that coming from a woman who was easily manipulated by the lies of a leftist rag and the homosexual agenda, which by the way, makes your comment to me especially asinine.
I agree, Guennie.
So he disowns his own daughter because she simply was honest with them. Talk about having your principles all out of whack. Alan Keyes is a phony.
Christ loves all. He just don't love the sin.
Yeah, you know the whole story by reading this offering from a liberal rag.
Tell me what I am missing. I'm aware of the fact it came from a Liberal rag. What's the whole story?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.