"Your last statement is your own biased characterization, which in reality is a mischaracterization. Everything was not "copacetic" as you claim.
Once again, her dishonoring her parents was enough to bring discipline in itself.
Disagreeing politically is not dishonoring. See below re lesbianism.
>"I realize that the Bible carries no weight with you,...<
ad hominem...show me where I said that
>"Ok, so you don't like Alan Keyes response. This is still America and he is free to respond in the manner that his faith and conscience dictates."<
And I am free to highlight his hypocrisy. As in, also, his "that was then and this is now" comment about carpetbaggers that Heisenberg posted.
Had there been evidence that he was responding immediately and clearly to the lesbian behavior, I wouldn't be posting. The evidence, though, does not support that.
What she did was not a simple matter of "disagreeing politically", what she did was to join in an agenda that is in opposition to everything her parents stand for, being used by that agenda because of her name and who her parents are, charging her parents with lies and distortions and being militant and defiant against her parents, while accepting their shelter, food, protection, payment of her education, etc......that is what was dishonoring.
You are free to state your opinion as well, but your opinion is not equal to truth, no matter how much you may wish it to be.