Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists breed cute tame foxes
BBC News ^ | Feb 8, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 02/22/2005 8:43:05 AM PST by balrog666

Forget hounds - foxes could become man's newest best friend, as scientists have shown they can be tamed.

After 45 years of breeding, tame foxes that wag their tails, greet humans with excited barks and look cute have been born in Siberia.

The original foxes were all black, but the new critters have white patches, big floppy ears, and curly tails.

The new foxes are also more curious, better at understanding humans, and less frightened of new things.

The scientists bred about 45,000 foxes to get to the tame stage.

When breeding the animals, they only chose them on how well they responded to people.

But the physical changes came as well - making scientists think cuteness comes along with being tame.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: animals; cute; doggieping; evolution; foxes; pets; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last
To: Richard Kimball
The problem with bears is not what they're willing to do, but what they're capable of doing. It's kind of like the story of the elephant yesterday that gored it's keeper to death. All it takes is one moment of anger, and you're singing a duet with Elvis.

Right, and that's why I said that they have to be domesticated. Training doesn't make an animal domesticated; breeding does. A wolf can't be trained to be a dog, and yet, dogs descended from wolves.

The capability of the animal is beside the point; literally millions of Americans live with dogs that are physically capable of killing them if the mood should strike. But the mood almost never does. That's the capability I'd like to give to a bear.

61 posted on 02/22/2005 11:06:06 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Even pet dogs have lapses. A lapsed polar bear boggles the mind.


62 posted on 02/22/2005 11:14:00 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
A friend of mine owns three wolf/dog hybrids, as well as one full blooded wolf. The only instances I have ever seen where any of them acted in any way other than a dog would was with the full-blood, whose instincts cause him to challenge my friend about once a yr or so for dominance, which is settled quickly with a size 10 boot.

I remember when German Shepherds were the dogs everyone feared, probably due to the stereotype about them used as Nazi guard dogs. Later, Doberman were what everyone was paranoid about. Then it was Pit Bulls. Then Rottweillers.

I have had LOTS of experience with all these breeds, and none of them, of the dogs I encountered, EVER showed a vicious tendency.

It is my belief that a certain dog gets a reputation, usually by one or two scattered attacks, which are done by ALL breeds, and then the sort of people who want vicious dogs, like drug dealers etc, start buying up those breeds. Next thing ya know we have a lot of such attacks, because these people bought those dogs and TAUGHT them to be vicious.

I owned a Rottweiller/Pitbull cross, and it was the biggest baby in the world. My wife's stupid chihuahua would start barking at him and if he had more than a stub tail, he would been tucking it. Kids could crawl all over that dog, pull is ears, they could do anything to him and he just lay there. The only time I ever saw that dog go off, was when a strange dog came into the yard and approached the kids... which Bear (my dogs name) nearly killed.
63 posted on 02/22/2005 11:18:28 AM PST by WindOracle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ORECON
We already have one. She is a Papillion.

And she's adorable.

64 posted on 02/22/2005 11:21:06 AM PST by Wolfstar (If you can lead, do it. If you can't, follow. If you can't do either, become a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Old News

We discussed this in FR in October 2002.

65 posted on 02/22/2005 11:22:36 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist; js1138
The capability of the animal is beside the point; literally millions of Americans live with dogs that are physically capable of killing them if the mood should strike. But the mood almost never does. That's the capability I'd like to give to a bear.

Allow me to jump in and suggest that you don't even need a lapse, per se, in training for it to be dangerous. I used to know a fellow who worked with mountain lions, and we got to talking on occasion. Anyway, for all intents and purposes, these cats were basically tame, he said - they were mostly born and raised in captivity, and were quite comfortable around people, sort of like a big housecat. But, he said, he never dared drop his guard when he was around them, particularly when they were acting like big housecats. The reason for that wasn't that he was afraid that they'd actually attack him with the intention of doing him harm. Rather, the reason was that they were such immensely powerful animals that one swipe was quite capable of snapping his neck, even as a matter of play. They wouldn't intend to harm him, but their strength was such that even playtime was potentially dangerous to humans. Given that, I hesitate to imagine a "pet" bear in a playful mood.

66 posted on 02/22/2005 11:27:36 AM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: night reader

I want one too...
My first thought was "Oh crap! Now another critter I want to add to the menagerie".

They are darlin'.


67 posted on 02/22/2005 11:28:54 AM PST by najida (Honest judge, how those toasters keep falling in the bathtub, I'll never know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Ask Roy.


68 posted on 02/22/2005 11:36:25 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Is he recovered enough to entertain questions yet? ;)


69 posted on 02/22/2005 11:41:43 AM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: D Rider
We discussed this in FR in October 2002.

Some news, unlike some arguments, is worth repeating.

70 posted on 02/22/2005 11:46:46 AM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Some news, unlike some arguments, is worth repeating.

Domestication and breeding are not evolution, if that's what you think this means.

71 posted on 02/22/2005 11:52:12 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Anyway, for all intents and purposes, these cats were basically tame, he said - they were mostly born and raised in captivity, and were quite comfortable around people, sort of like a big housecat.

That's what Roy Horn says, but I don't buy it. The tiger that mauled him wasn't "playing", but reverting to type. "Montecore vuz tryingk to save me!" Yeah, sure...save him for breakfast, perhaps.

The reason for that wasn't that he was afraid that they'd actually attack him with the intention of doing him harm. Rather, the reason was that they were such immensely powerful animals that one swipe was quite capable of snapping his neck, even as a matter of play.

Horses and cows are stronger still. Potentially dangerous, yes, but we trust their temperament in situations where we could never trust a trained wild animal.

Given that, I hesitate to imagine a "pet" bear in a playful mood.

I don't imagine that domestic grizzlies would be used as lap animals. I imagine them loping around a car dealer's lot at night, or pushing concrete barricades into place, or running down a perp.

72 posted on 02/22/2005 11:55:27 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Yes, and the big cat is blameless, of course. Nevertheless, big animals do not need to intend harm.


73 posted on 02/22/2005 11:57:03 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

I have to say something about cats. I have two that hunt. Both bring their catches home to show us, and since they have a kitty door, they bring them into the house.

One of them is of the "eat the best part and leave the rest as a offering to the big mother cat." The other seems to believe in catch and release. Catching and killing are two entirely different activities for a cat.

Not that it matters if you're eight feet tall and weigh 800 pounds.


74 posted on 02/22/2005 12:02:35 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

I think there's a cube law problem in the case of Roy's injury. The force needed to pick up an adult human with a mouth full of teeth is quite a bit greater than the force needed to pick up a cub. Roy was just too big.

Even if the cat was in meal mode, there's a difference in the ways cats behave when they are killing. It's quite definitive.


75 posted on 02/22/2005 12:07:41 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Potentially dangerous, yes, but we trust their temperament in situations where we could never trust a trained wild animal.

"We"? I dunno about PA, but the days when herds of cattle and horses roamed unsupervised amidst the gently rolling hills of Northern Virginia are basically long gone, if they ever existed in the first place ;)

More seriously, we keep those sorts of animals contained for more reasons than just to keep them from hitting the road. Horses bite and kick, cattle charge, and that's partly why we keep them behind fences these days. Even trained, domesticated guard dogs are not simply set loose on the dealer's lot overnight - if they're not directly supervised and restrained by a handler, they're contained, and a bear will require a bit more in the way of "containment" than the chain-link fence that holds the Rotty in at night.

By that same token, police dogs are restrained by a handler who is generally a large fellow, capable of holding the dog back with a leash, even when the dog would prefer to charge in and attack, but I don't foresee the police departments finding officers who can successfully restrain a bear on a leash. Oh, sure, I suppose you could build some sort of mobile pen to haul the thing around, but even if you did, a police dog is highly unlikely to kill a perp before the handler can catch up and restrain it. A 500 pound bear, OTOH, is far more likely, I think, to do such a thing, whether accidentally or not. Police dogs chase perps because we've leveraged and redirected their natural prey-chasing instincts - I'm not sure that this is wise idea with bears, especially not when simply knocking over and stepping on suspects is enough for the animal to accidentally kill someone.

76 posted on 02/22/2005 12:16:02 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: D Rider
Domestication and breeding are not evolution, if that's what you think this means.

If a new species results, what would you call it?

77 posted on 02/22/2005 12:16:58 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
I want a pet fox.


78 posted on 02/22/2005 12:18:28 PM PST by Lazamataz (Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WindOracle

One problem with pit bulls today is that so many of them are bred and trained for fighting. There are a lot more dog fights going on than the public knows about.


79 posted on 02/22/2005 12:22:58 PM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority

lol


80 posted on 02/22/2005 12:26:22 PM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson