Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New guidelines for treating 'intersex' babies
MSNBC ^ | 2/18/2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/18/2005 5:05:50 PM PST by nyg4168

Doctors urged not to operate on infants with unclear gender

It’s the first question new parents hear: girl or boy? But hundreds of babies are born each year where the gender isn’t clear. Prompt surgery to assign one was once the norm.

But gender depends on more than anatomy or hormones. It also seems to stem from the very earliest brain development, researchers said Friday in urging doctors to hold off on the knife until children can determine their own sex.

“To discover who or what a child is ... you have to ask them,” Dr. William Reiner of the Oklahoma University Health Science Center told a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

“There is no one biological parameter that clearly defines sex,” added Dr. Eric Vilain of the University of California, Los Angeles, whose research suggests gender is genetically hard-wired into the brain before birth — regardless of which genitalia develop.

The issue is “intersex,” the name for numerous conditions that result in roughly one in 4,000 babies born with both male and female traits.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baby; gender; genetics; hermaphrodite; hermaphrodites; intersex; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Wow, this is a tough one. What a heartbreak for parents who have to make this choice and the children who have to live with the consequences. Giving these families some sort of grace period to figure things out seems like a good idea. On the other hand, I've heard of some people born this way saying, "Just leave me like I am, this is how God created me."
1 posted on 02/18/2005 5:05:52 PM PST by nyg4168
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nyg4168
Sometimes mistakes are made. Parents are terribly defensive on behalf of their children in those cases.

When in doubt (years after the fact) don't ask!

2 posted on 02/18/2005 5:09:53 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168
I watched a program on this. It really is rare. Hundreds of babies seems an aggrandized number.
All unborn children start out female. Sometimes the testicles do not drop, giving a male child the outward appearance of female.

Once again it is very rare.
3 posted on 02/18/2005 5:10:23 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168

Some huge percentage of intergender children are male without fully formed male genitalia. I had a client who when through three operations by the time he was four. I saw the pix of him in the hospital and by the time he had had his third operation, he was no longer the happy toddler. BUT he had the requisite equipment. wow. such pain in this world. I did the paternity case forcing his bio father to not only pay for his college but encouraging, thanks to a wonderful judge, a relationship with a father he had never known.


4 posted on 02/18/2005 5:10:55 PM PST by Mercat (Andy walks with me Andy talks with me, Andy tells me I am His own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168

The past handling of such cases has been idiocy. The idea that you can change a boy into a girl just by mutilating him & giving him some hormones is about the most repugnant thing in recent medical science, aside from abortion.


5 posted on 02/18/2005 5:11:57 PM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168

Jamie Lee Curtis would have made a terrible man. It looks like they guessed correctly.


6 posted on 02/18/2005 5:17:24 PM PST by Patti_ORiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

And the part in this story about the woman who was mistakenly raised as a boy, then had to go through changing her identity, and now she can't get married to a man because Texas won't change her birth certificate? Talk getting kicked while your down. Poor woman. I hope some good lawyer in Texas volunteers to help her out.


7 posted on 02/18/2005 5:18:33 PM PST by nyg4168
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I just get the feeling there is more of an agenda in this research than meets the eye.


8 posted on 02/18/2005 5:18:39 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168

Yeah, it's ridiculous that an error on your birth certificate can't be corrected.


9 posted on 02/18/2005 5:20:01 PM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I get the same feeling.


10 posted on 02/18/2005 5:23:28 PM PST by jwalburg (Those buried included children still clutching toys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Not so rare that it's unknown in FReeperdom, though. I know someone who was born intersex.


11 posted on 02/18/2005 5:25:37 PM PST by Xenalyte (Your mother sells hot dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sloth


David Reimer is a classic example of what happens when a boy is raised a girl. It's a truly sad story.


12 posted on 02/18/2005 5:27:41 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

One in 4000 births, I just googled it.

Out of 280 million, that would be 7 thousand, if I've done my math right, here in the US.


13 posted on 02/18/2005 5:29:34 PM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Or maybe 70,000?

I'm trying to do it in my head...I think 70,000 is right.


14 posted on 02/18/2005 5:30:55 PM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Out of 280 million, that would be 7 thousand, if I've done my math right, here in the US.

More like 70,000.

15 posted on 02/18/2005 5:32:29 PM PST by Tamar1973 (The Constitution is a FOUNDING DOCUMENT, not a living document --Lauralee Braswell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

Yes, you're right, of course. See my post right above your correction.


16 posted on 02/18/2005 5:33:47 PM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168

Back when they first started doing sex change operations this is the only case I could support it for. I do think mistakes were/are made when a decision is made at birth. I think in the past it was made more to make the child look normal and shield them. I would think they would be able to determine the sex fairly early in life. But I'm not sure what criteria is used to do so. I'm sure corrective surgery isn't a pleasant thing but it would be better than being trapped in an opposite sex body.


17 posted on 02/18/2005 5:36:01 PM PST by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
The idea that you can change a boy into a girl just by mutilating him & giving him some hormones is about the most repugnant thing in recent medical science

How about the idea that you can change a girl into a boy just by leaving her in a body with 'boy' parts?

18 posted on 02/18/2005 5:36:53 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
The term "intersex" is completely inappropropriate. Intersex by definition means having both male and female sex organs, technically an intersex individual could impregnate himherself which has never happened in the history of mankind.
MSN is wrong with their terminology. They are referring to babies of ambiguous sexual characteristics.
19 posted on 02/18/2005 5:37:17 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

It is very simple. The doctors should do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING until the kid grows up and figures out what he or she is or if they are happy just the way they are. Guessing with a knife and hormones and parents' selfish wishes leads to absolute disaster.


20 posted on 02/18/2005 5:38:08 PM PST by RobertMorrow (H.R. 1146 will WITHDRAW the USA from the United Nations' madhouse/cesspool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson