When in doubt (years after the fact) don't ask!
Some huge percentage of intergender children are male without fully formed male genitalia. I had a client who when through three operations by the time he was four. I saw the pix of him in the hospital and by the time he had had his third operation, he was no longer the happy toddler. BUT he had the requisite equipment. wow. such pain in this world. I did the paternity case forcing his bio father to not only pay for his college but encouraging, thanks to a wonderful judge, a relationship with a father he had never known.
The past handling of such cases has been idiocy. The idea that you can change a boy into a girl just by mutilating him & giving him some hormones is about the most repugnant thing in recent medical science, aside from abortion.
Jamie Lee Curtis would have made a terrible man. It looks like they guessed correctly.
Back when they first started doing sex change operations this is the only case I could support it for. I do think mistakes were/are made when a decision is made at birth. I think in the past it was made more to make the child look normal and shield them. I would think they would be able to determine the sex fairly early in life. But I'm not sure what criteria is used to do so. I'm sure corrective surgery isn't a pleasant thing but it would be better than being trapped in an opposite sex body.
Earlier thread on same AP article here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1346318/posts
The HRC and other MSM mediots must see this as a way of "bluring" the debate on homosexual marriage. It is pure propaganda.
Create confusion.
This is not a difficult debate. This is not unlike the thalidimide babies. Where are the gene tests? This story is way to basic.
First CBS now PMSNBC are pushing these stories? coincidence?
What happened? All the NYT homosexuals went to work for the wacko cable groups?
Goebles would be proud.