Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Has the Feminist Movement Done to Modesty -- And American Girls?
Human Events Online ^ | Feb. 16, 2005 | Linda Chavez

Posted on 02/16/2005 7:35:13 AM PST by MisterRepublican

If you watch a lot of cable television, you've probably seen the ads, especially late at night or early in the morning. The "Girls Gone Wild" videos promise to show you coeds behaving badly on the beach during Spring Break or getting down and dirty at Mardi Gras. The formula is simple: find a group of nubile young things drunk out of their heads and induce them to pull up their T-shirts or pull down their shorts and expose themselves to anyone willing to fork over $19.95 for the privilege. The most recent incarnation features gangster rapper Snoop Dogg hawking fresh, young flesh.

Call me old-fashioned, but I just can't imagine what these girls were thinking when they agreed to "show off their assets," as one knock-off video boasts. These young women aren't pros -- they are not part of the pornographic underworld -- but ordinary teens and twenty-somethings who one day will be wives and mothers. One young girl, who was 17 at the time she allowed herself to be photographed topless, has already sued the producers of "The Guy Game," a video game featuring females in various stages of undress. Her suit claims she did not give a "valid or enforceable consent or release" for photos to be used by the video game makers. "Plaintiff is still a teenager and wishes to attend college, develop her career and be active in her community and church." Good luck.

What is most shocking about this phenomenon is that we're not all that shocked by it. Modesty used to be considered a natural female attribute. No more. Just take a look around next time you're at the mall.

(Excerpt) Read more at humaneventsonline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: culturewars; fashion; feminists; girls; girlsgonewild; influence; lindachavez; mardigras; media; snoopdogg; teens; theguygame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-314 next last
To: Question_Assumptions

Mixed race marriage was never illegal in the Caribbean so you're right about that.


221 posted on 02/16/2005 10:55:26 AM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Similarly, men have always been less bound by standards of virture than women.

Not in Christianity. There's no watered-down version of "Thou shalt not commit adultery" for men.

222 posted on 02/16/2005 10:57:20 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

THat's because the taxpayers didn't support it.


223 posted on 02/16/2005 10:59:18 AM PST by johnb838 (Evolution is Paganizm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Not in Christianity. There's no watered-down version of "Thou shalt not commit adultery" for men.

Sure. So what? In most Western societies, keeping a mistress has been pretty common for men and was generally ignored.

224 posted on 02/16/2005 10:59:27 AM PST by Modernman ("Normally, I don't listen to women, or doctors." - Captain Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
In most Western societies, keeping a mistress has been pretty common for men and was generally ignored.

Not by God, and not by his wife, either.

225 posted on 02/16/2005 11:00:36 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

And if you happen to knock a woman up accidently, you would do the honorable thing and marry her so that kid can have a father, right?


226 posted on 02/16/2005 11:01:14 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
keeping a mistress has been pretty common for men and was generally ignored

It wasn't that common and it was disapproved of.

227 posted on 02/16/2005 11:02:03 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

Sure, assuming she decided to keep it. Why do you ask?


228 posted on 02/16/2005 11:06:27 AM PST by Modernman ("Normally, I don't listen to women, or doctors." - Captain Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

You said..."bb you said it right... at no point ever in American history has a black women been seen as virtuous and feminine."

Assuming you are right (we cant know either way)...it would be difficult to establish cause and effect considering the general attitudes displayed towards blacks back in earlier times.

What I do know is what Walter Williams has affirmed...that before the advent of liberal social engineering...the illegitemacy rate among blacks was significantly less than among whites of the same (and perhaps higher) economic level, due I asume, to the tight integration of religion into the black family and community.


229 posted on 02/16/2005 11:06:58 AM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon

You are right about liberal social engineering.


230 posted on 02/16/2005 11:09:18 AM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Campion
A vast majority of girls are lifting their shirts in public?

The way they dress in high schools, their shirts are already 3 inches above their pants, and no imagination is required to figure out the rest of the story.

So then... Help me out here... Are these girls only 4 inches from their waists to their shoulders? Unless they're the size of a Barbie doll, there's quite a bit above that 3 inches being left to the imagination.

231 posted on 02/16/2005 11:15:05 AM PST by Redcloak (More cleverly arranged 1's and 0's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
I also played with Barbies,but I think that even Barbies now a days can send the wrong message,but that all depends on someones point of view,IMO.
My daughter really only played with her Barbie when her friends came over.Like I said she was more of a tomboy and would rather play with her older brothers racetrack or action figures.

Now that she is 12 her more feminine side shows.She is now more interested in things that girls her age are into,with restrictions of course.We as parents don't believe in having boyfriends and such things at this age and made it very clear to both kids.The older brother,by 5 years, sets a very good example for his younger sister.

We of course can't stop her from having a crush,but I sure as heck won't give in for her to act up on this feeling.
So far she has respected our strict rules and wishes without a problem.

The same friend ,I mentioned earlier had the same rules with her oldest,but gave in to her daughter by allowing the boy she had a crush on into her house,thinking that this doesn't constitute dating.Needless to say that the stepfather,who raised her as his own from age 2,didn't agree.She was supposed to be the role model for his to girls,out of the marriage to my friend.The older daughter is not a bad kid and she hasn't gotten pregnant or anything like that,in fact she is still a virgin.I guess what I am getting at is that this mom keeps sending the wrong message to her kids.

My husband and I set the same rules for both of our kids,despite of one being a boy and the other a girl and have stood by them.
We don't differentiate between the sexes to make sure that both are raised the same.
232 posted on 02/16/2005 11:16:56 AM PST by Mrs.Nooseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

No, their tops are skin-tight.


233 posted on 02/16/2005 11:17:23 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
Actually, Queen Elizabeth, her dad, and his dad were pretty well behaved - got made fun of for being "bourgeois" royals. Edward VIII was more typical.

But before that, the royals were extremely naughty (some scandal even surrounded Queen Victoria, a/k/a "Mrs. Brown"). Her son Edward VII was a legendary roue, and of course George III's various sons (including Victoria's father, the egregious George IV (Prince Regent), and the Duke of Cumberland (who murdered his valet and was accused of committing incest with his sister), collectively called by the Duke of Wellington "the damndest set of millstones around the neck of a nation".

But I was thinking more of the likes of Caro Lamb or the Duchess of Devonshire, or maybe Earl Ferrers, who was hanged for murder and delivered to the dissectionists.

234 posted on 02/16/2005 11:17:34 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
(Maureen Down) titled her ramble, “Men Just Want Mommy”, and it is essentially the wretched rationalization of one who fought on the losing side of a war. Maureen, like so many other mindless, ungrateful feminists, thought she could have it all. She could be famously successful at work and then find a man later. ...

Why on earth would anybody want to marry a woman who was not old-fashioned? Marriage is an old-fashioned arrangement. If a woman is non-traditional there is no reason to marry her. What do you get out of marrying a radical?

Dowd's Your Mommy by Bernard Chapin
235 posted on 02/16/2005 11:20:03 AM PST by opineapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion
If their tops are skin tight, then how do the "vast majority" of these girls wrestle their tops up to flash their hoo-hoos? I'm having some problems with this visual.
236 posted on 02/16/2005 11:21:12 AM PST by Redcloak (More cleverly arranged 1's and 0's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
If their tops are skin tight, then how do the "vast majority" of these girls wrestle their tops up to flash their hoo-hoos?

I don't mean to say that the vast majority are flashers. The vast majority are dressing immodestly. A skin-tight top with belly showing (that's what I meant by "shirts up") and low cut jeans is immodest, distracting, and not an appropriate thing to wear, at least not to school.

237 posted on 02/16/2005 11:24:09 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Unless you're Amish, showing a little midriff isn't the same as lifting your top up to expose your breasts. You're making much ado about nothing.
238 posted on 02/16/2005 11:28:16 AM PST by Redcloak (More cleverly arranged 1's and 0's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Nooseman

I know what you mean about some of the Barbies sending the wrong message.......I'm very picky about what kind of clothes I buy for the doll.....I try to stick to the traditional styles, like evening gowns, like I had as a kid and stay as far away from the "slutty" stuff as possible. We're trying our best not to send her mixed messages.

It sounds like you and your husband are doing a wonderful job raising your kids. Good for you.

We only have the one and she bounces between real girlie-girl and tomboy. For Christmas she wanted a new baby doll........and hot wheels cars. LOL!


239 posted on 02/16/2005 11:28:16 AM PST by Gabz (Anti-smoker gnatzies...small minds buzzing in your business..............SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand








"In practice, the sexual liberation of women has realized men's most predatory sexual fantasies. As women shook themselves free from the norms and conventions of sexual conduct, men did the same."

Feminism and the Unraveling of the Social Bond
240 posted on 02/16/2005 11:28:25 AM PST by opineapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson