Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

People in the News (Cheech & Chong)
Findlaw.com ^ | February 13, 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/13/2005 11:35:17 AM PST by kennedy

ASPEN, Colo. (AP) - Cheech and Chong may have joked about marijuana in their movies, but the comedians say they didn't touch the stuff when the cameras were rolling.

"We tried one time and we wasted so much film," said Tommy Chong, recalling a scene in "Up in Smoke." "We were in the car waiting for the cue, you know. And the camera's rolling and we're sitting there, you know, and neither one of us heard the cue."

Chong and former partner Cheech Marin appeared together for the first time in 20 years at the U.S. Comedy Arts Festival.

Chong said he isn't ashamed of introducing millions of Vietnam-era kids to marijuana. "When you think of how many kids died drinking alcohol, I feel I've saved millions of lives," he said.

Marin said their humor was appreciated by an unexpected group: "Cops were our biggest fans. Because they dealt in what we were dealing with everyday, but in reality... they saw the essential humor and they laughed."

Marin and Chong, who recently completed a nine-month sentence for trying to sell marijuana pipes on the Internet, said they are writing two new films, "Grumpy Old Stoners" and "Lord of the Smoke."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cheech; chong; davesnothereman; donutwatch; whytheycallitdope; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-183 next last
To: robertpaulsen
"And the State Constitutions are subordinate to the US Constitutions supreme Law of the Land, and all State officials are pledged to support the US Constitution & its Amendments. Read Article VI sometime, once you get out of that corner."

I see. So if Congress passes a constitutional federal law, and the law survives numerous court challenges all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, then the citizens of the states must also comply, correct?

IF, big if, it is constitutional. Our courts make many mistakes, and the other branches of both State & Fed governments are supposed to check & balance the judicial. -- As do juries.

And if a state official, pledged to support the US Constitution, attempts to pass state legislation contrary to federal law, why, that would be treason, would it not? Well then, you and I are in agreement.

Not really. You still advocate a States 'right' to prohibit guns, or most anything else.
Moral majority rule is not the american way, paulsen.

121 posted on 02/15/2005 6:50:32 AM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: myrabach

Looks like sh*t, tastes like sh*t, "hmm, good thing we didn't step in it".


122 posted on 02/15/2005 6:53:25 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Cuz, are you still dueling with the pot heads?


123 posted on 02/15/2005 6:59:00 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

I think MrLeRoy just heard the judge say: "Baliff, whack his pepee".


124 posted on 02/15/2005 7:04:29 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

Most of the 'dueling' here is being done to the banjo music of "states rahts". -- You one too?


125 posted on 02/15/2005 7:52:48 AM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr; robertpaulsen

You and paulsen are quite the comedy team.

"The Lawyer and the Stooge" - soon to be a motion picture!

A vomitous counterpoint to Cheech and Chong.


126 posted on 02/15/2005 7:53:12 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: P_A_I

Yup, I belive that if the states want to restict the use of dope and jail dope heads, they have that right.


127 posted on 02/15/2005 7:53:54 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Congress has the power to regulate commerce among the states. That power to regulate includes the power to prohibit.

So growing your own should be perfectly legal.

128 posted on 02/15/2005 8:07:42 AM PST by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
AxelPaulsenJr wrote:

Yup, I belive that if the states want to restict the use of dope and jail dope heads, they have that right.

But wouldn't you agree, -- if a state official, pledged to support the US Constitution, attempts to pass state legislation contrary to that document, why, that would be treason, would it not?
Can States prohibit/restrict the use of guns & jail gun nuts?

129 posted on 02/15/2005 8:10:26 AM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: P_A_I
James Madison in Federalist No. 45:

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."

130 posted on 02/15/2005 8:21:54 AM PST by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
I think MrLeRoy just heard the judge say: "Baliff, whack his pepee".

I posted that same line on another thread, and they pulled my comment. Go figure.

131 posted on 02/15/2005 8:23:20 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Depends on which mod is on duty.


132 posted on 02/15/2005 8:26:11 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: P_A_I
But wouldn't you agree, -- if a state official, pledged to support the US Constitution, attempts to pass state legislation contrary to that document, why, that would be treason, would it not? Can States prohibit/restrict the use of guns & jail gun nuts?That is why we have a supreme court, and more importantly the power of the vote. If the people want pot legalized they will vote it in. Todate I have not seen a large movement among the people in that direction.
133 posted on 02/15/2005 8:28:58 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
Gumption wrote:

James Madison in Federalist No. 45:
"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."

Yep.. Some powers are "prohibited by it [the Constitution] to the States".
-- The BOR's enumerates some of those prohibited powers , but does not deny that there are "others retained by the people".
See the 9 & 10th Amendments.

134 posted on 02/15/2005 8:52:28 AM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
You got that right! Why are there so many apparent pot heads on FR? Is it perhaps because they are Boomers with ingrained habits? Look how many posts on this thread are against any law to control pot. Questions: Does pot smoking have any deleterious effects on human brains or bodies? Does pot smoking occasionally cause injury or death to the smoker or others? Do such accidents have some effect upon my taxes? If the majority are so opposed to the laws, why not try to change them through the system to better conform to their habits? If the Feds are failing at the WOD, why are so many of the big traffickers in jail?

Sorry, but these are questions that do come up. I will be sure to read all answers and think them through thoroughly. Keep in mind, I don't care about your habits, except if they impact me and mine (taxes and I hate taxes).

135 posted on 02/15/2005 8:55:02 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
AxelPaulsenJr wrote:

Yup, I belive that if the states want to restict the use of dope and jail dope heads, they have that right.

But wouldn't you agree, -- if a state official, pledged to support the US Constitution, attempts to pass state legislation contrary to that document, why, that would be treason, would it not?

Can States prohibit/restrict the use of guns & jail gun nuts?

That is why we have a supreme court, and more importantly the power of the vote. If the people want pot legalized they will vote it in.

Typical 'majority rules' reply, straight out of the socialist playbook. Pot was never 'criminalized' by a vote, it was prohibited by a fiat 'law'. -- Just as assault weapons are criminalized in Calif.

Todate I have not seen a large movement among the people in that direction.

So you support prohibitions on 'evil items'..
Some conservative you are...

136 posted on 02/15/2005 9:07:58 AM PST by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

If you want to shut RP up permanatly ask him about the safety of vioxx that was approved by the federal goverment to treat pain you know the same fed gov that kicks in your door and shoots you in the middle of the night for marijuana possision becaseu marijuana is a dangourous drug in the same vein as crack ,herion, and pcp.


137 posted on 02/15/2005 9:08:20 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Annie03; AntiBurr; Baby Bear; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; BroncosFan; Capitalism2003; dAnconia; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
138 posted on 02/15/2005 9:09:07 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
Why are there so many apparent pot heads on FR?

The fact that you misidentify those who have a more fastidious sense of constitutional proprieties than yourself as 'pot heads' only demonstrates your slavish devotion to the modern cult of the State.

Conservatives can only shudder in the face of such perversity - in the end, your false God will fail you.

139 posted on 02/15/2005 9:21:55 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Question: Who owns your body, the government or you?


freedom n 1: the condition of being free; the power to act or speak or think without externally imposed restraints 2: immunity from an obligation or duty. (3)

liberty n 1: The condition of being free from restriction or control. 2. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing. 3. The condition of being physically and legally free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor. (4)

Does imprisoning people who smoke pot match with the above definitions?


140 posted on 02/15/2005 9:26:40 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/tsunami_tyranny.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson