Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reuters: Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles to Marry
Reuters via CNBC Europe | February 10, 2004

Posted on 02/10/2005 1:13:48 AM PST by Dont Mention the War

Just announced on CNBC Europe.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britishcrown; britishroyals; brits; chuck; consort; di; diana; harry; homewrecker; princecharles; princesscamilla; royalfamily; royals; royalwedding; uk; weddingbells; wils; windsors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: Clemenza

"Diana was a whore."

I'll concede that she went thru with the marriage knowing Chuck didn't love her, which certainly makes her a gold-digger, but I think the whore part only came later.

Charles needed to marry a virgin and Diana qualified.


21 posted on 02/10/2005 1:24:31 AM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason

Make 'em live in a semi-detached in Fulham ...Charles and Camilla can open an ethic grocery and smile at the patrons as only THEY know how ...Let's see what they're REALLY worth !


22 posted on 02/10/2005 1:24:57 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

Please don't let them have any children. {shudder!}


23 posted on 02/10/2005 1:24:59 AM PST by Allegra ("They Just Love to Walk in the Middle of the Road!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

Well, it's about time those two crazy kids got together and it's time Charlie makes her an honest woman.


24 posted on 02/10/2005 1:25:17 AM PST by SoDak (hoist that rag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

"She looks like a man , man."

25 posted on 02/10/2005 1:25:38 AM PST by Imaverygooddriver (I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
Make 'em live in a semi-detached in Fulham ...Charles and Camilla can open an ethic grocery and smile at the patrons as only THEY know how ...Let's see what they're REALLY worth !

Alternatively, we could leave His Royal Highness's private financial affairs alone for as long as he is not receiving payment from the tax-payers.
26 posted on 02/10/2005 1:28:09 AM PST by tjwmason (For he himself has said, and it's greatly to his credit, he remains an Englishman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

>>A gay guy and a lesbian tie the knot.

>So...does that mean he can't be King?

Uh... I think, by definition, he can only be a queen.

Anyway I recall reading something about this before...

An ambitious gay boy from Khartoum,
Took a lesbian up to his room,
But they argued all night,
About who had the right,
To do what, and with which, and to whom.


27 posted on 02/10/2005 1:28:10 AM PST by Triggerhippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

He's been playing polo much too long. Quite the mare he's got there now, eh!


28 posted on 02/10/2005 1:28:26 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Diana was a whore.

I'm glad for you that you have your life mapped out so successfully that you'd never succumb to adulterous affairs while your spouse carried a torch both emotionally and physically for another. I'm thrilled your head was tied on so tight you would never have fallen for the 'fairy princess, lived happily ever after' story. Not to mention the stresses of living in a fish bowl. Me? I prefer to hope I would have carried on with a stronger sense of morals and would have found away to hold my head high while being surrounded by protocol, infidelity and a loveless life. To each his own.

29 posted on 02/10/2005 1:28:44 AM PST by Sally'sConcerns (Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason; Clemenza
I never followed it enough to know that!

Wow, this only makes the whole situation even more reprehensible.

30 posted on 02/10/2005 1:30:48 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

Clarence House (Charles version of the White House). Consent of the Queen and Tony Blair.
Sheer number of questions regarding this union. Talk about private matters. To think he openly has an affair and nobody blinks an eye.

Evidently this all brings up religious questions.

Dang, what a web they weave.

Lets get to the brass tacks, he has lived in sin, how is the church going to allow them to marry in the Church, would it be blessed by the church?

Divorced women cannot marry in the church.

Wow, this will be a news item ....


31 posted on 02/10/2005 1:34:08 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War; Lijahsbubbe

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/caption/428/


32 posted on 02/10/2005 1:34:54 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Too many men forget the stories little girls are told about the Prince who sweeps them off of their feet with protestations of undying love. Look at who her Mother was and the stories she wrote. Is it any wonder Diana had difficulties in separating reality from fiction?

I don't think she was a gold digger. I think she bought into the whole Prince Charming routine until she was slapped in the face with Mr. Jerk's marrying her as a brood mare.

I feel for Diana and her never ending search to be loved for who she was and not what she had to offer.


33 posted on 02/10/2005 1:36:01 AM PST by Sally'sConcerns (Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Actually from what I've heard, Prince William is more in line to become King. But, I dunno, after his showing up to some party in Nazi garb, I think he jeopardized his chances.


34 posted on 02/10/2005 1:37:11 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke-free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: djf
He's been playing polo much too long.

Just one more nag in the stable is all.

35 posted on 02/10/2005 1:38:39 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke-free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
She looks almost as good as an aging Dustin Hoffman.



I'm sure all her beauty is on the inside.

Yikes! What a bowser!!
36 posted on 02/10/2005 1:38:47 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

I'm pretty sure it was Prince Harry that wore the Nazi uniform.


37 posted on 02/10/2005 1:41:00 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I stand corrected. You're right, it was Harry. Nonetheless, I've heard that William is more in line for the throne than his father Prince Charles.


38 posted on 02/10/2005 1:44:28 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Smoke-free since January 16, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sally'sConcerns

err.. princeling #2: Harry -- 'e ain't Chucky's son.


39 posted on 02/10/2005 2:30:39 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

That was Harry, the son of Di and her polo instructor.


40 posted on 02/10/2005 2:31:21 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson