Will someone please let W know this. Even Reuters can see it for heavens sake.
To: Mark in the Old South
I'm offended by this article.
2 posted on
02/02/2005 1:47:56 PM PST by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: Land of the Irish; pro Athanasius; thor76; AlbionGirl; Pio; pascendi; ultima ratio; Maximilian; ...
3 posted on
02/02/2005 1:49:41 PM PST by
Mark in the Old South
(Note to GOP "Deliver or perish" Re: Specter I guess the GOP "chooses" to perish)
To: Mark in the Old South
"they were growing bolder about pushing their beliefs on others — even at the risk of offending someone."
"Pushing their beliefs" is PC code talk for 'unwilling to embrace the perversion and sacrilege being shoved down their throats'.
4 posted on
02/02/2005 1:49:47 PM PST by
Spok
To: Mark in the Old South
At the same time, those polled said they were growing bolder about pushing their beliefs on others — even at the risk of offending someone. At the risk of offending someone? How long has ActUp been invading St. Patrick's Cathedral and tossing around condoms?
5 posted on
02/02/2005 1:52:25 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
To: Mark in the Old South
To: Mark in the Old South
"increasingly intolerant"
"pushing their beleifs on others"
Oh well... No bias to see here folks... Move along now.
8 posted on
02/02/2005 2:02:48 PM PST by
Betaille
(Harry Potter is a Right-Winger)
To: Mark in the Old South
Big difference between being more vocal and being intolerant. I think the churches are finally finding their voices.
9 posted on
02/02/2005 2:06:39 PM PST by
mlmr
(The Majority of the Murders Committed Worldwide have been Committed by Leftist Governments..........)
To: Mark in the Old South
Many polled are leery of political compromises on core beliefs Regardless of Reuters' Christophobic spin, this is still bad news for liberal (R)'s, which is good news for conservatism.
10 posted on
02/02/2005 2:12:57 PM PST by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: Mark in the Old South
Yes, those Christians are getting more outspoken. Time to smack them down!
To: Mark in the Old South
If church-goers are bolder, it's because those who oppose Christianity have been in their faces for several decades, pushing an agenda that is openly hostile to Christian values and essentially undemocratic. Church-goers know that the left pushes its agenda primarily through the courts--because it can't be achieved by means of the ballot box. They have reacted to this in predictable ways--by pushing back politically. For every action there's a reaction.
To: Mark in the Old South
"they were growing bolder about pushing their beliefs on others — even at the risk of offending someone."
Unlike liberals and atheists. /sarcasm
To: Mark in the Old South
Of course these folks who attack the Boy Scouts and anything Christian are not pushing their beliefs on anyone.
17 posted on
02/02/2005 2:16:21 PM PST by
Revel
To: Mark in the Old South
Funny, I never read of homosexuals being "intolerant" of social norms and sodomy laws.
22 posted on
02/02/2005 2:33:49 PM PST by
SampleMan
("Yes I am drunk, very drunk. But you madam are ugly, and tomorrow morning I shall be sober." WSC)
To: Mark in the Old South
I think balance is concept lost to both ends of the political spectrum.
24 posted on
02/02/2005 2:53:10 PM PST by
Tempest
(Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
To: Mark in the Old South
Not true, I like midgets just fine....well except Tom Dashole, Lola Pelosi.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighting Troops
26 posted on
02/02/2005 3:18:58 PM PST by
bray
(Iraq Freed Politically and Pray it will be Freed Spiritually)
To: Mark in the Old South
I don't even have to read the rest of this PMSNBC drivel. Imagine Christians becoming bold in their faith? It's surely the sign of the END of the WORLD. I can't even begin to tolerate those evil Christians pushing their self-suicidal beliefs on the body politic. For shame, for shame. sic,,,
27 posted on
02/02/2005 3:23:50 PM PST by
STD
(Last Action Hero)
To: Mark in the Old South
From the article:
"There do not seem to be very many voices arguing for compromise today," she said in an interview. "It could be that more religious voices feel under siege, pinned against the wall by cultural developments. They may feel more emboldened as a result."
I can understand that position and have felt that way myself. But I'm not sure if we as a whole haev approached the response in a proper manner.
28 posted on
02/02/2005 3:45:03 PM PST by
Tempest
(Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
To: Mark in the Old South
Rush is reading this artical on-air right now.
30 posted on
02/04/2005 11:36:08 AM PST by
The SISU kid
(I'd rather be a doubting Thomas, than a touting dumb-ass)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson