Posted on 01/25/2005 4:40:04 AM PST by section9
Yes folks, I know it's a couple of hours away, but for you loyal C-Span listeners, the debate will be carried live on C-Span 2 today. Live streaming on C-Span 2's server for those of you with high bandwidth carriers.
Box-o-Rox has asked for a full hour in which to call Dr. Rice a lying slut. Meantime, the senior Senator from the state of West Virginia has brought some friends of his down to testify to Rice's unfitness for her office:
Other Dhimmis have asked for time to object to Dr. Rice as well. Meantime, I wonder if McCain or Hagel will actually rise to her defense?
(...sound of crickets...)
Arlen Specter? Anybody?
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Box-O-Rox, love it. Bumping to find later.
I don't care WHY they're doing it, I just want them to keep it up!
I will be counting on you guys today; I am babysitting and the TV is on children's programming. I want details!
I agree w your great points. I'm thinking that they may be doing it to also marginalize her 'power' and the Bush administration in the world (w the leaders, etc. she'll be working w). Which is stupid, and IMHO somewhat anti-American, but that's never stopped them from doing/saying things before.
Well, it's not like I needed a tutorial on leftist racism. I'm well aware of all of that and was opining on Biden's comments specifically. I could well be wrong, but I look at how that particular fool speaks to everybody.
Check this out.
New Video Shows Kennedy Kin Abusing Black Woman
A new documentary set to be released this week shows Ted Kennedy's son abusing an African-American female security guard at Los Angeles International Airport five years ago.
A clip in "Taking on the Kennedys," filmed by director Josh Seftel, captures Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., getting physical with security guard Della Patton as Patton was loading his luggage into a scanner.
Dr. Rice is a very smart, mature woman who can take care of herself. She's dealt with much more important and dangerous people than the Senate Democrats. She'll be fine. The Democrats, however, are only digging themselves deeper into the hole they began while x42 was President. I think the Republicans in the Senate are only providing the shovels.
Jim Nicholson's hearing for Sect'y of VA is on CSPAN 2 now and Osama Obama is questioning. Geez, are the Dims trying to push him or what? 2 fairly high profile committees as soon as he gets in the Senate. My, my, you don't they're trying to 'groom him' and get him in front of the cameras just a little for '08 or '12, do ya.
If everyone is sure that Rice will be confirmed easily when the vote actually occurs, isn't it no less than anti-American sedition to continue to try running her reputation into the ground? Isn't this all just grist for the Al Qaeda mill that will be aired on Al-Jazeera? Oh wait. I almost forgot. These are Democrats whose raison d'etre is Anti-Americanism.
"....Byrd voted against, Clarence Thomas and Thursgood Marshal..."
and also filibustered for 14 hours against the Civil Rights Act.
Where's the NAALCP now?
GO Dr. Rice!
That's what I originally thought, too.
Who does a moral relativist think he's kidding when he waves a document that was only put into place to guard absolute moral truth?
He reminds me of other moral relativists in the Religious Left -- like Jim Wallis (Editor of Sojourners Magazine) -- who ask questions like, "Is Jesus a Republican or a Democrat?"
Only a shallow thinker like Bill O'Reilly would accept that false premise -- (like he did when Michael Moore asked him if he would be willing to send his son to die in Iraq)-- and then go on and attempt to answer it.
Like Hillary Clinton, who follows the "Rules for Radicals" tactics of her mentor, Saul Alinsky to the "T", Jim Wallis, would never ask people to answer this question:
"Is Jesus a moral relativist?"
The Marxist, Saul Alinsky, in his book Rules for Radicals teaches "organizers" that they must give a moral appearance: All effective action requires the passport of morality.
The tenth rule of the ethics of means and ends states that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral arguments ... Moral rationalization is indispensable at all times of action whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means.
Rules for Radicals provides the "organizer" with a tactical style for community organization that assumes an adversarial relationship between groups of people in which one either dominates or is dominated. ...."
And Saul Alinsky follows his own rules, too:
Sojourners Magazine March/April 2000 issue [Hillary's Marxist mentor] Saul Alinsky Goes to Church Faith-based community organizing ... by Helene Slessarev HERE
Arm yourself with the low-down:
The Religious Left - Who they are and what they believe - Dr. Ronald H. Nash, PhD. Here is an interview with Ron Nash. On the right side of the page, click on Oct. 2004 and scroll down to October 11.
If Boxer repeats her lie that OBL and Saddam weren't working together, please link this new chronologically ordered list of articles which proves her lie to the appropriate place. I'll be having to leave at 11:00.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts
Perhaps this is the "Thomas Dachle Memorial Barbie-Que"
Please don't misunderstand me, I'm not in disagreement with you nor was it my intention of giving a tutorial. I apologize if it came across that way.
We need our Republican Senators to stand up and recount all the ways in which Boxer is lying about this matter.
The families with kid serving in Iraq deserve better and deserve to know their children are risking their lives for a good reason, not for a lie.
And sadly, you're right. Truth is to Democrats what kryptomite is to Superman. They can't exist in the same room.
You know Im not going to miss this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.