Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peggy Noonan: Way Too Much God
Wall Street Journal ^ | January 21, 2005 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 01/20/2005 9:33:31 PM PST by RWR8189

Was the president's speech a case of "mission inebriation"?

It was an interesting Inauguration Day. Washington had warmed up, the swift storm of the previous day had passed, the sky was overcast but the air wasn't painful in a wind-chill way, and the capital was full of men in cowboy hats and women in long furs. In fact, the night of the inaugural balls became known this year as The Night of the Long Furs.

Laura Bush's beauty has grown more obvious; she was chic in shades of white, and smiled warmly. The Bush daughters looked exactly as they are, beautiful and young. A well-behaved city was on its best behavior, everyone from cops to doormen to journalists eager to help visitors in any way.

For me there was some unexpected merriness. In my hotel the night before the inauguration, all the guests were evacuated at 1:45 in the morning. There were fire alarms and flashing lights on each floor, and a public address system instructed us to take the stairs, not the elevators. Hundreds of people wound up outside in the slush, eventually gathering inside the lobby, waiting to find out what next.

The staff--kindly, clucking--tried to figure out if the fire existed and, if so, where it was. Hundreds of inaugural revelers wound up observing each other. Over there on the couch was Warren Buffet in bright blue pajamas and a white hotel robe. James Baker was in trench coat and throat scarf. I remembered my keys and eyeglasses but walked out without my shoes. After a while the "all clear" came,

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: analyticalgenius; boldpeggy; gentlecritic; inauguraladdress; meeeeeooooow; noonan; pegomyheart; prescientpeg; sensiblechic; theantirove; traitor; w2; way2muchnoonan; whattawoman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 861-871 next last
To: paulat
Hitler was a painter. So was Churchill. I am not going to judge their respective works on "artistic merit" alone.

You should.

381 posted on 01/21/2005 9:10:50 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Ms. Noonan is very talented. Talented people tend to get full of themselves, especially if they don't have a spouse and children to assault their egos regularly!


382 posted on 01/21/2005 9:14:47 AM PST by Tax-chick ("The short, gray-haired lady, with all the kids.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

She shouldn't have used the word, 'inebriation'. That wasn't becoming.


383 posted on 01/21/2005 9:14:51 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I took a quick peek on the two threads to check how people are piling on Peggy just for having an opinion. It was exactly what I expected.


384 posted on 01/21/2005 9:16:49 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat

If Hillary Clinton tells you that it would be stupid for you to play in rush hour traffic, would you reject that idea because she's a doodyhead, and onto the highway you go? Of course not. The conclusion may yet be true, though a doodyhead makes it or it is arrived at illogically.


385 posted on 01/21/2005 9:19:30 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: lainie
I took a quick peek on the two threads to check how people are piling on Peggy just for having an opinion. It was exactly what I expected.

Exactly as I expected, there would be people like you who would fail to understand that these threads are NOT about "Peggy just for having an opinion."

386 posted on 01/21/2005 9:20:31 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: paulat

From what I read, they are. It's full of excuses why she must be being led astray. Perhaps she really just feels the way she feels. Perhaps she's just trying to get a rise out of you. Perhaps she's just lying for ratings' sake. But people who otherwise "love" her stuff are piling on her and that's a fact.


387 posted on 01/21/2005 9:22:15 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Reducto absurdum.


388 posted on 01/21/2005 9:22:29 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: All

Rush addresing these "critics" from both sides. Nailing them RIGHTLY.


389 posted on 01/21/2005 9:23:51 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I think Peggy is a wonderful reflective writer, which is why her books and speeches have been so good. I'm going to give her the benefit of the doubt and assume her reflexive opinions aren't always spot on. I'd be interested in her perspective in a month.


390 posted on 01/21/2005 9:23:51 AM PST by nicolezmomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
To misquote Leonard Cohen: "Democracy is coming to the UAE!"


391 posted on 01/21/2005 9:24:19 AM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

It MUST be something other than the water.
They make Shiner out of that water.
Q.E.D.
P.S. BTW, Shiner tastes like it's been run through a horse!


392 posted on 01/21/2005 9:26:17 AM PST by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny
Remember when Ronald Reagan died? It was forever before any of the talking heads had her on and I kept wondering where she was....her being one of his major speechwriters or so she always claimed. I found her grating at that time. Talented she may be but she comes across as a very much a "me me me" kind of person. Of course now all the pundits want her since she has denigrated Pres Bush's speech.

And have you read her little pep talk to the Democrat party?http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110006120

393 posted on 01/21/2005 9:31:23 AM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: paulat

And?


394 posted on 01/21/2005 9:34:16 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Didn't hear Laura this morning, what is her take on the speech?


395 posted on 01/21/2005 9:35:24 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: caddie

Lots of folks like Shiner Beer....taste like it was run through a horse....Teehe...now how would you know that. Been tasting horse pee lately... ;o)


396 posted on 01/21/2005 9:35:28 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Peggy Noonan: It was a God-drenched speech. This president, who has been accused of giving too much attention to religious imagery and religious thought, has not let the criticism enter him. God was invoked relentlessly.

This is bizarre criticism. (I wonder if Noonan has ever been criticized for God-drenching a column. I would imagine so.) For me, the speech struck just the right note, and even if it was, as Noonan says, "rather heavenish," well, that's what inaugural speeches tend to be. They're not State of the Union speeches.

Did this criticism really need to be made? I saw Noonan on Fox News last night and I thought, Do you really need to say this? And now?

No, conservatives shouldn't be "cheerleading," as another poster pointed out, but neither should well-known conservatives take every opportunity to get face and air time by bashing Bush, especially over something so trivial. And let's face it, that's what these pundits are doing. They know the MSM will latch onto any criticism of Bush by conservatives. They get to look good. They get to be called "independent thinkers" or "mavericks."

Noonan could have graciously waited a few days to make her silly comments (and I'm speaking as a big fan of hers). Instead she decided to grab the opportunity of the moment. Too bad.

397 posted on 01/21/2005 9:36:39 AM PST by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon; All

Heres a question from the bleacher section of FR.

If Peggy had written a column praising Bushs speech to the stars...to the point of going over the top, and somebody got on this site and criticized her...by saying she was paid off to write the column, or had written the speech herself, or was having a bad PMS day...what would have been the response?


398 posted on 01/21/2005 9:38:37 AM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

No doubt about it. This article reads like there are some sour grapes where Noonan is concerned.


399 posted on 01/21/2005 9:38:58 AM PST by ChevyZ28 (852,000 Police Officers serve in the US. Every 53 hours, one of them dies in the line of duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

LOL.


400 posted on 01/21/2005 9:39:19 AM PST by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 861-871 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson