Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Volcanic Warming Eyed in 'Great Dying'
Yahoo! News | AP ^ | 1/20/05 | Randolph E. Schmid

Posted on 01/20/2005 12:30:29 PM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2005 12:30:31 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


2 posted on 01/20/2005 12:34:27 PM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

My theory on the Great Dying is that some species had reached a state of advancement in intelligence and technology that they were able to see into the distant future.

Upon seeing the event of Hillary Rodham, that decided that the only prudent course to save the universe was mass extinction.

Sadly, they failed.


3 posted on 01/20/2005 12:45:26 PM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Once you expose a huge amount of underwater sediment to the atmosphere, two very bad things happen — a huge amount of carbon in the sediments is released and also methane. Once (methane) hits the atmosphere it's the most efficient greenhouse gas on the planet," he said.

So the current "Global Warming Trend" advertised by the left will actually cause sea levels to rise thereby reducing the amount of underwater sediment to the atmosphere, reducing greenhouse gasses?

4 posted on 01/20/2005 12:51:35 PM PST by frog_jerk_2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004

These things are pretty complicated.

Really, Really enormous volcanic eruptions (Like the "Siberian Traps" eruption that covered an area the size of Europe with Lava and made every eruption of Yellowstone look like a joke by comparison) both cool the earth and heat it up.

They initially cool the earth with SO2 emissions; so it gets real cold, really fast. Then longer term you get global warming because of greenhouse gas emissions that stay in the atmosphere much longer.


5 posted on 01/20/2005 12:53:52 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JFK_Lib
"Once you expose a huge amount of underwater sediment to the atmosphere, two very bad things happen — a huge amount of carbon in the sediments is released and also methane. Once (methane) hits the atmosphere it's the most efficient greenhouse gas on the planet," he said.

tHEY WERE KILLED BY A GIANT fART?.....

6 posted on 01/20/2005 12:55:02 PM PST by Red Badger (And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you FReep!........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"90 percent of all marine life and nearly three-quarters of land-based plants and animals went extinct."

You mean Darwin's progressive evolution didn't occur?

Cataclysm is the key to species' existence and extinction?

Is the "Theory of Evolution" as posed by Darwin and contradicted by these scientific facts expunged from our schools?

7 posted on 01/20/2005 12:59:03 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Democrat Obstructionists will be Daschled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I'd guess that the tususami released more methane than a billion SUVs in a hundred years.


8 posted on 01/20/2005 12:59:15 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"the absence of evidence isn't evidence for absence."

The same thing can be said for WMDs.

9 posted on 01/20/2005 1:01:33 PM PST by Library Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

Pretty clear you don't have even have the foggiest understanding of evolution.


10 posted on 01/20/2005 1:02:12 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
You mean Darwin's progressive evolution didn't occur?

Where do you get this from?

11 posted on 01/20/2005 1:03:18 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

But catastrophic events don't contradict evolutionary theory.


12 posted on 01/20/2005 1:06:17 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
What's the lowest percentage of oxygen a human can live in and what percentage of oxygen is the equivalent to, say, the amount of oxygen at the top of Everest (which is about as high as humans can survive)? Anyone know?
13 posted on 01/20/2005 1:06:35 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Really, Really enormous volcanic eruptions (Like the "Siberian Traps" eruption that covered an area the size of Europe with Lava and made every eruption of Yellowstone look like a joke by comparison) both cool the earth and heat it up.

Agreed. I've seen some discovery channel shows detailing this eruption. It really makes us appreciate how "calm" things are now geologically. After the tsunami, it seemed like most thought it was the biggest geological event ever.

I am curious if you saw anything new in this article. I saw a discovery channel program last year that mentioned the Russian volcano eruption as the probably cause of the great extinction. I was under the impression that this has been the prevailing hypothesis for a while.

14 posted on 01/20/2005 1:08:16 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Ok, according to Intelligent Design, God did it so there is no need for this absurd research. Wasting taxpayers dollars on professor's salalries when we all know it was God's will and we shouldn't think to much about it < /sarcasm>


15 posted on 01/20/2005 1:35:59 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

More likely: a Global Winter. The lowering of sea levels he talks about is related to Ice Ages, where water on Earth and in its atmosphere is locked up in ice and glaciers, instead of flowing back into the sea again.


16 posted on 01/20/2005 1:39:10 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"the absence of evidence isn't evidence for absence."

Sounds like a Dem request for a special prosecutor.

17 posted on 01/20/2005 1:39:58 PM PST by theDentist (Jerry Springer: PBS for White Trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Sounds like my ice bucket.


18 posted on 01/20/2005 1:42:55 PM PST by Old Professer (When the fear of dying no longer obtains no act is unimaginable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Library Lady

Carl Sagan used the absence/evidence argument famously in the 1970s, I believe; his disincorporated remains watch over us as we speak.


19 posted on 01/20/2005 1:45:58 PM PST by Old Professer (When the fear of dying no longer obtains no act is unimaginable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

About 19%.


20 posted on 01/20/2005 1:47:34 PM PST by Old Professer (When the fear of dying no longer obtains no act is unimaginable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson