Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist's anti-prayer suit smited by Rehnquist
New York Daily News ^ | 1/20/05 | Richard Sisk

Posted on 01/20/2005 2:51:35 AM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON - Ailing Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist showed he still had some legalistic punch yesterday, squashing an atheist's attempt to knock the traditional prayer out of President Bush's inauguration.

Rehnquist, 80, is scheduled to swear in Bush for his second term today; he has not been seen in public since October, when he announced he is battling thyroid cancer.

If Rehnquist cannot make it today, 84-year-old Associate Justice John Paul Stevens will pinch-hit for him.

Rehnquist set the stage for the swearing-in, however, by rejecting a suit by atheist Michael Newdow to cancel the prayer. Without comment, Rehnquist deep-sixed the suit, and the prayer will come off as scheduled.

Newdow, a California doctor and lawyer, once tried to have the phrase "one nation under God" taken out of the Pledge of Allegiance. He also tried to have the prayer eliminated from Bush's first inauguration.

Richard Sisk



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antitheist; churchandstate; lawsuit; prayer; rehnquist; scotus; w2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2005 2:51:36 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

2 posted on 01/20/2005 2:53:53 AM PST by kb2614 ( You have everything to fear, including fear itself. - The new DNC slogan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Fitting that a man in the last stages of life address this issue.

An atheist .v a man preparing to see God face to face.

Newdow looks so silly now.


3 posted on 01/20/2005 2:54:42 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Go Howard Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"smited?"

Ya gotta love the "biblical" language! hahahahah


4 posted on 01/20/2005 2:57:02 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

If Newdow is an acknowledged atheist, what does that Rev. before his name mean? Is he acknowledging that his "no god" of atheism is a religion as much as any "god(s)" of another faith are religions?

An agnostic says "we cannot be sure" if there is a God. An atheist has no such doubt. He has faith in the "no god" God.

I really wish that the no god people would quit pushing their religion on the rest of the world. Freedom OF religion is NOT freedom FROM religion.


5 posted on 01/20/2005 3:00:28 AM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

If I eat a chunk from an apple, I haven't bited the apple.

Seems to me it should be "smit." His suit was, after all, a bunch of smit...oops, darn that spellchecker! :)


6 posted on 01/20/2005 3:00:35 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Dismissed without comment.

SMACK!

7 posted on 01/20/2005 3:02:39 AM PST by G.Mason (A war mongering, UN hating, military industrial complex loving, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Agreed.

I've also debated commies, couching their ideology in the form of state worship. They don't appreciate that, I've found.


8 posted on 01/20/2005 3:03:49 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Go Howard Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Aw, come on. Tell me you haven't "hated" the jerks like newdow and the aclu destroying this country.


9 posted on 01/20/2005 3:04:19 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Don't get your grammatical sensibilities into such a snit.


10 posted on 01/20/2005 3:05:01 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Go Howard Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I'm not losing sleep over it or anything, don't worry. It's not like someone gets smit every day, ya know. :)


11 posted on 01/20/2005 3:16:15 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I still fail to see why these so-called athiests care about a simple prayer.
12 posted on 01/20/2005 3:20:32 AM PST by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Well, yeah, but that has a lot of other reasons to be considered proper. I suppose I can name another -ite word that would be conjugated -ited (expedited leaps to mind) but it just doesn't sound right.

Main Entry: smite
Pronunciation: 'smIt
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): smote /'smOt/; smit·ten /'smi-t&n/; or smote; smit·ing /'smI-ti[ng]/
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English smItan to smear, defile; akin to Old High German bismIzan to defile
transitive senses
1 : to strike sharply or heavily especially with the hand or an implement held in the hand
2 a : to kill or severely injure by smiting b : to attack or afflict suddenly and injuriously [smitten by disease]
3 : to cause to strike
4 : to affect as if by striking [children smitten with the fear of hell -- V. L. Parrington]
5 : CAPTIVATE, TAKE [smitten with her beauty]
intransitive senses : to deliver or deal a blow with or as if with the hand or something held
- smit·er /'smI-t&r/ noun

Maybe it's "smote."


13 posted on 01/20/2005 3:22:34 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pillbox_girl

It's not the prayer they care about, it's the power to stifle free speech they're after.


14 posted on 01/20/2005 3:23:56 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Don't get bit by the smit snit. It's the pits. Found a cute game.
15 posted on 01/20/2005 3:24:50 AM PST by ovrtaxt (Go Howard Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Conjugation of "smite"

Principal Parts: smites, smiting, smote, smitten/smote
Infinitive: to smite
Perfect infinitive: to have smitten
Present participle: smiting
Past Participle: smitten or smote (nice to have a choice here)
Present
I, we, you, they smite

he, she, it smites

Present Progressive
I am smiting

we, you, they are smiting

he, she, it is smiting

Future
I, he, she, it

we, you, they will smite

Past
I, he, she, it

we, you, they smote

Past Progressive
I, he, she, it was smiting

we, you, they were smiting

Present Perfect
I, we, you, they have smitten

he, she, it has smitten

Past Perfect
I, he, she, it

we, you, they had smitten

Future Perfect
I, he, she, it, we, you, they

will have smitten





16 posted on 01/20/2005 3:37:11 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Present I, we, you, they smite he, she, it smites Present Progressive I am smiting we, you, they are smiting he, she, it is smiting Future I, he, she, it we, you, they will smite Past I, he, she, it we, you, they smote Past Progressive I, he, she, it was smiting we, you, they were smiting Present Perfect I, we, you, they have smitten he, she, it has smitten Past Perfect I, he, she, it we, you, they had smitten Future Perfect I, he, she, it, we, you, they will have smitten

Rehnquist did 'em all...

;)

17 posted on 01/20/2005 3:40:17 AM PST by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Isn't the correct past participle for this sentence structure "smote"?


18 posted on 01/20/2005 3:54:05 AM PST by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Isn't the correct past participle for this sentence structure "smote"?

Either way, Newdow is in DEEP SMIT!

19 posted on 01/20/2005 4:07:19 AM PST by Egon (Government is a guard-dog to be fed, not a cow to be milked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

See post 16, you have a choice, LOL...smitten or smote.


20 posted on 01/20/2005 4:13:46 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson