Posted on 01/20/2005 2:51:35 AM PST by kattracks
WASHINGTON - Ailing Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist showed he still had some legalistic punch yesterday, squashing an atheist's attempt to knock the traditional prayer out of President Bush's inauguration.Rehnquist, 80, is scheduled to swear in Bush for his second term today; he has not been seen in public since October, when he announced he is battling thyroid cancer.
If Rehnquist cannot make it today, 84-year-old Associate Justice John Paul Stevens will pinch-hit for him.
Rehnquist set the stage for the swearing-in, however, by rejecting a suit by atheist Michael Newdow to cancel the prayer. Without comment, Rehnquist deep-sixed the suit, and the prayer will come off as scheduled.
Newdow, a California doctor and lawyer, once tried to have the phrase "one nation under God" taken out of the Pledge of Allegiance. He also tried to have the prayer eliminated from Bush's first inauguration.
Richard Sisk
Fitting that a man in the last stages of life address this issue.
An atheist .v a man preparing to see God face to face.
Newdow looks so silly now.
"smited?"
Ya gotta love the "biblical" language! hahahahah
If Newdow is an acknowledged atheist, what does that Rev. before his name mean? Is he acknowledging that his "no god" of atheism is a religion as much as any "god(s)" of another faith are religions?
An agnostic says "we cannot be sure" if there is a God. An atheist has no such doubt. He has faith in the "no god" God.
I really wish that the no god people would quit pushing their religion on the rest of the world. Freedom OF religion is NOT freedom FROM religion.
If I eat a chunk from an apple, I haven't bited the apple.
Seems to me it should be "smit." His suit was, after all, a bunch of smit...oops, darn that spellchecker! :)
SMACK!
Agreed.
I've also debated commies, couching their ideology in the form of state worship. They don't appreciate that, I've found.
Aw, come on. Tell me you haven't "hated" the jerks like newdow and the aclu destroying this country.
Don't get your grammatical sensibilities into such a snit.
I'm not losing sleep over it or anything, don't worry. It's not like someone gets smit every day, ya know. :)
Well, yeah, but that has a lot of other reasons to be considered proper. I suppose I can name another -ite word that would be conjugated -ited (expedited leaps to mind) but it just doesn't sound right.
Main Entry: smite
Pronunciation: 'smIt
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): smote /'smOt/; smit·ten /'smi-t&n/; or smote; smit·ing /'smI-ti[ng]/
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English smItan to smear, defile; akin to Old High German bismIzan to defile
transitive senses
1 : to strike sharply or heavily especially with the hand or an implement held in the hand
2 a : to kill or severely injure by smiting b : to attack or afflict suddenly and injuriously [smitten by disease]
3 : to cause to strike
4 : to affect as if by striking [children smitten with the fear of hell -- V. L. Parrington]
5 : CAPTIVATE, TAKE [smitten with her beauty]
intransitive senses : to deliver or deal a blow with or as if with the hand or something held
- smit·er /'smI-t&r/ noun
Maybe it's "smote."
It's not the prayer they care about, it's the power to stifle free speech they're after.
Conjugation of "smite"
Principal Parts: smites, smiting, smote, smitten/smote
Infinitive: to smite
Perfect infinitive: to have smitten
Present participle: smiting
Past Participle: smitten or smote (nice to have a choice here)
Present
I, we, you, they smite
he, she, it smites
Present Progressive
I am smiting
we, you, they are smiting
he, she, it is smiting
Future
I, he, she, it
we, you, they will smite
Past
I, he, she, it
we, you, they smote
Past Progressive
I, he, she, it was smiting
we, you, they were smiting
Present Perfect
I, we, you, they have smitten
he, she, it has smitten
Past Perfect
I, he, she, it
we, you, they had smitten
Future Perfect
I, he, she, it, we, you, they
will have smitten
Rehnquist did 'em all...
;)
Isn't the correct past participle for this sentence structure "smote"?
Either way, Newdow is in DEEP SMIT!
See post 16, you have a choice, LOL...smitten or smote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.