Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Happy Birthday-Robert E Lee
Civil War Home ^

Posted on 01/19/2005 7:38:59 AM PST by Valin

The idol of the South to this day, Virginian Robert E. Lee had some difficulty in adjusting to the new form of warfare that unfolded with the Civil war, but this did not prevent him from keeping the Union armies in Virginia at bay for almost three years. The son of Revolutionary War hero "Light Horse" Harry Lee-who fell into disrepute in his later years attended West Point and graduated second in his class. During his four years at the military academy he did not earn a single demerit and served as the cadet corps' adjutant. Upon his 1829 graduation he was posted to the engineers. Before the Mexican War he served on engineering projects in Georgia, Virginia, and New York. During the war he served on the staffs of John Wool and Winfield Scott. Particularly distinguishing himself scouting for and guiding troops, he won three brevets and was slightly wounded at Chapultepec.

Following a stint in Baltimore Harbor he became superintendent of the military academy in 1852. When the mounted arm was expanded in 1855, Lee accepted the lieutenant colonelcy of the 2nd Cavalry in order to escape from the painfully slow promotion in the engineers. Ordered to western Texas, he served with his regiment until the 1857 death of his father-in-law forced him to ask for a series of leaves to settle the estate.

In 1859 he was called upon to lead a force of marines, to join with the militia on the scene, to put an end to John Brown's Harper's Ferry Raid. Thereafter he served again in Texas until summoned to Washington in 1861 by Winfield Scott who tried to retain Lee in the U. S. service. But the Virginian rejected the command of the Union's field forces on the day after Virginia seceded. He then accepted an invitation to visit Governor John Letcher in Virginia. His resignation as colonel, 1st Cavalry-to which he had recently been promoted-was accepted on April 25, 1861.

His Southern assignments included: major general, Virginia's land and naval forces (April 23, 1861); commanding Virginia forces (April 23 July 1861); brigadier general, CSA (May 14, 186 1); general, CSA (from June 14, 186 1); commanding Department of Northwestern Virginia (late July-October 1861); commanding Department of South Carolina, Georgia and Florida (November 8, 186 1-March 3, 1862); and commanding Army of Northern Virginia June 1, 1862-April 9, 1865).

In charge of Virginia's fledgling military might, he was mainly involved in organizational matters. As a Confederate brigadier general, and later full general, he was in charge of supervising all Southern forces in Virginia. In the first summer of the war he was given his first field command in western Virginia. His Cheat Mountain Campaign was a disappointing fizzle largely due to the failings of his superiors. His entire tenure in the region was unpleasant, dealing with the bickering of his subordinates-William W. Loring, John B. Floyd, and Henry A. Wise. After this he became known throughout the South as "Granny Lee. " His debut in field command had not been promising, but Jefferson Davis appointed him to command along the Southern Coast.

Early in 1862 he was recalled to Richmond and made an advisor to the president. From this position he had some influence over military operations, especially those of Stonewall Jackson in the Shenandoah Valley. When Joseph E. Johnston launched his attack at Seven Pines, Davis and Lee were taken by surprise and rode out to the field. In the confusion of the fight Johnston was badly wounded, and that night Davis instructed Lee to take command of what he renamed the Army of Northern Virginia. He fought the second day of the battle but the initiative had already been lost the previous day. Later in the month, in a daring move, he left a small force in front of Richmond and crossed the Chickahominy to strike the one Union corps north of the river. In what was to be called the Seven Days Battles the individual fights-Beaver Dam Creek, Gaines' Mill, Savage Station, Glendale, White Oak Swamp, and Malvern Hill-were all tactical defeats for the Confederates. But Lee had achieved the strategic goal of removing McClellan's army from the very gates of Richmond.

This created a new opinion of Lee in the South. He gradually became "Uncle Robert" and "Marse Robert." With McClellan neutralized, a new threat developed under John Pope in northern Virginia. At first Lee detached Jackson and then followed with Longstreet's command. Winning at 2nd Bull Run, he moved on into Maryland but suffered the misfortune of having a copy of his orders detailing the disposition of his divided forces fall into the hands of the enemy. McClellan moved with unusual speed and Lee was forced to fight a delaying action along South Mountain while waiting for Jackson to complete the capture of Harpers Ferry and rejoin him. He masterfully fought McClellan to a stand still at Antietam and two days later recrossed the Potomac.

Near the end of the year he won an easy victory over Burnside at Fredericksburg and then trounced Hooker in his most creditable victory at Chancellorsville, where he had detached Jackson with most of the army on a lengthy flank march while he remained with only two divisions in the immediate front of the Union army. Launching his second invasion of the North, he lost at Gettysburg. On the third day of the battle he displayed one of his major faults when at Malvern Hill and on other fields-he ordered a massed infantry assault across a wide plain, not recognizing that the rifle, which had come into use since the Mexican War, put the charging troops under fire for too long a period. Another problem was his issuance of general orders to be executed by his subordinates.

Returning to Virginia he commanded in the inconclusive Bristoe and Mine Run campaigns. From the Wilderness to Petersburg he fought a retiring campaign against Grant in which he made full use of entrenchments, becoming known as "Ace of Spades" Lee. Finally forced into a siege, he held on to Richmond and Petersburg for nearly 10 months before beginning his retreat to Appomattox, where he was forced to surrender. On January 23, 1865, he had been named as commander in chief of the Confederate armies but he found himself too burdened in Virginia to give more than general directives to the other theaters.

Lee returned to Richmond as a paroled prisoner of war, and submitted with the utmost composure to an altered destiny. He devoted the rest of his life to setting an example of conduct for other thousands of ex-Confederates. He refused a number of offers which would have secured substantial means for his family. Instead, he assumed the presidency of Washington College (now Washington and Lee University) in Lexington, Virginia, and his reputation revitalized the school after the war. Lee's enormous wartime prestige, both in the North and South, and the devotion inspired by his unconscious symbolism of the "Lost Cause" made his a legendary figure even before his death. He died on October 12 1870, of heart disease which had plagued him since the spring of 1863, at Lexington, Va. and is buried there. Somehow, his application for restoration of citizenship was mislaid, and it was not until the 1970's that it was found and granted.

Source: "Who Was Who In The Civil War" by Stewart Sifakis


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: civilwar; dixie; dixielist; happybirthday; robertelee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: IrishCatholic
I find it interesting that all the thread is about is celebrating a man that had more moral character than just a few in the last 200 years of American history and we get people that make disparaging remarks about the man and finally from you about the people that revere his memory. You know, forget about the war, you are right it was over a long time ago Just think about this man's accomplishments and celebrate them. I would be one proud father if my boys were one half the man that he was.
61 posted on 01/19/2005 8:58:05 AM PST by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: koba37
Robert E. Lee wasn't a racist

By the standards of today he most certainly was. But then again, so was virtually every other person, North and South, alive at the time. Including Lincoln.

62 posted on 01/19/2005 8:59:03 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: JCISLORD

The problem many of us "uneducated Yankees" have is those who support the Confederacy seem to pretend that slavery was not even an issue.


63 posted on 01/19/2005 8:59:06 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lee Heggy

Well said, sir.


64 posted on 01/19/2005 8:59:27 AM PST by LTCJ (CPT Joshua Byers, USA. 1974-2003. Well done, son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Valin
If I didn't know better, this posting might be an attempt to drive a wedge with the South.....now who would want to alienate the South?

Not us Northern FReepers......how about Liberal Coasters?

The Civil War is over, the Cultural War is still raging.

....but we can see the Lib's weakening right before our eyes! Right, Teddy boy?

65 posted on 01/19/2005 9:06:21 AM PST by add925 (The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1

Lee represented the state of Viriginia. He did not get involved until Virginia was INVADED by the federals.


66 posted on 01/19/2005 9:07:50 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Lincoln represented a racist north, because maryland and deleware allowed slavery during the civil war and they were union states.

Lee fought to have blacks that fought for the south freed, you are an ignorant, uneducated slob.
67 posted on 01/19/2005 9:08:16 AM PST by DixieOklahoma (Alabama - in 2006 vote ROY MOORE governor! - don't let us down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
What about maryland and deleware, I am sure it is difficult for your pea-brain to comprehend, but those were union states that allowed slavery.

Must mean that they were likewise fighting for slavery.

okay now don't get a headache, but here's another one:

During the revolutionary war, EVERY SINGLE US STATE allowed slavery. Brittian did not, infact brittian even offered FREEDOM to ANY slave that would rise up and support the crown.

Therefore by your pea-brained logic, during the revolutionary war, we, the united states were fighting to preserve slavery and every single founder was a racist.
68 posted on 01/19/2005 9:17:31 AM PST by DixieOklahoma (Alabama - in 2006 vote ROY MOORE governor! - don't let us down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: skutter
This war was not about slavery, even though your communist schools taught you so.

On the contrary, the anti-American socialists and communists who dominate our educational establishment these days would love for you to believe that slavery had no bearing on the civil war, and that no meaningful abolitionist movement existed, because one of the most prominent tactics employed by the anti-American Left is to tear down the moral stature and reputation of the United States so that impressionable young minds can be made to hate their own country. To admit that the moral forces within the US, based largely on Christian belief, were so powerful as to draw an entire nation of men to war against their brothers would be to undermine the Left's position that the US is evil.

It may be true that the issue of slavery was not the sole cause of the Civil War, but only a fool would believe that the Civil War would ever have occurred had slavery not existed.
69 posted on 01/19/2005 9:32:20 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: add925

There are NO ulterior motives in my posting this, other than to make people aware that today is Robert E Lees birthday.


70 posted on 01/19/2005 9:34:45 AM PST by Valin (Sometimes you're the bug, and sometimes you're the windshield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
Will somebody answer why slavery was allowed in maryland and deleware, two union states... and don't give me the crap about "but there were riots, they ALMOST succeeded",

Their regiments did just as much raping, pillaging, and murdering as any of the other massive hordes that invaded the south.
71 posted on 01/19/2005 9:35:13 AM PST by DixieOklahoma (Alabama - in 2006 vote ROY MOORE governor! - don't let us down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Everything I've read about Lee has said the he was opposed to slavery. Since it is impossible for me to know first hand, I've had to rely on what I've read. You found a letter that shows something else and I will acknowledge it and do more research.

I think it's important to remember that Lee, like everyone else at the time, were products of their environment. Yes, there were some that could clearly see the evil of slavery, but sadly, not that many. Thomas Jefferson owned slaves. Should we deny his significance to our country because he did something that we now find abhorrent?
72 posted on 01/19/2005 9:39:21 AM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (Schni schna schnappi, schnappi, schnappi, schnapp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SilentServiceCPOWife

I'm not trying to disparage Lee. But I don't want him made into something he wasn't. There is enough of that going around as it is. On both sides.


73 posted on 01/19/2005 9:41:54 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Try listening to the original version of "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down" by The Band. Not at all lame. It's very authentic feeling. As tho it were written in 1865.


74 posted on 01/19/2005 9:48:51 AM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DixieOklahoma
Will somebody answer why slavery was allowed in maryland and deleware, two union states... and don't give me the crap about "but there were riots, they ALMOST succeeded",

Their regiments did just as much raping, pillaging, and murdering as any of the other massive hordes that invaded the south.


I'm not sure why you're asking me this.

My take on the Civil War is that the South was not necessarily fighting to keep slavery, but that slavery was the most prominent issue that brought the rift between regions to a head. The intense pressure from the North to abolish slavery led to Southern states seeing their sovereignty threatened.

It is quite clear that there were supporters of slavery in the North (or at least, many who were apathetic to it) and there were many who were against slavery in the South. However, once the States were set at odds over that and other issues, regional and cultural loyalties far outweighed views on slavery.
75 posted on 01/19/2005 10:04:03 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Lee Heggy
Close but strike one. The commentary was a warning to someone who doesn't understand the Dixie Ping list. I didn't refer to Robert E. Lee at all.
As far as Southern culture is concerned you might just have to specify the time. Current? Forty years ago with fire hoses and bombing of churches? Eighty years ago with lynching of blacks with the town gathered for the photo's? How about 160 years ago when you could own another human being simply by the amount of pigment in their skin?
The South of today is no better nor worse than any other part of the country from the Northwest to well, ok, not the Northeast, but any other segment. But do not regale me with fond tales of a bygone era. They exist only as fantasy for those descended from the owners, not the property.
76 posted on 01/19/2005 10:18:51 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SilentServiceCPOWife

I liked your post. Those who blame the south for slavery forget that the very framers of the constitution didn't deal with the issue among them Washington and Jefferson. Adams wanted to but knew the Virginians and the other states wouldn't ratify without slavery being left alone. If the south had slaves, the framers of the constituion are to blame.


77 posted on 01/19/2005 10:20:22 AM PST by cajungirl (my peeps are freeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

I didn't refer to R.E. Lee either in my post to you. As a reenactor who doesn't want to relive the war and is often on both sides in performing living history I just want to get it right and not revise what happened to satisfy those who think it was all about one issue. On one side I am a descendant of slave owners who freed their slaves in the 1830s. I am also descendant of native Americans on the other side. Theres plenty of injustice to go around. My point to you was in regard to the disparaging tone of your remarks. I didn't say the South was any better than any other part of our country. What I referenced was about the society that I grew up in and to this day understand to be not a fantasy but composed of real flesh and blood people. I'm hardly regaling you of anything and if my sympathies for the culture reflect something of a bygone era so be it. I am at least a gentleman by birth and not a self-made bastard by choice.


78 posted on 01/19/2005 11:42:32 AM PST by Lee Heggy (For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: KMC1

Robert E. Lee was a tragic figure in the full Classical sense; but I must disagree with your summation of him as offered through the prism of our modern day. It is one thing to dismiss a Lee when judged by 21st century standards - but it would do well for us to remember a simple truth about that time: that before the Civil War, the United States "were" (... referred to as a collection of states, hence a multiple confederation), and after the war, the United States "was" (... now a single entity). When you think about this, you can better understand that Lee saw himself as first a Virginian, and an American second - he was defending his homeland.

True, Slavery was the scourge upon our Country, the Single Most Important Question in the first century of our Republic. Good men - Americans - fell on both sides of the issue. The issue was greater than any single man, yet not so permanent that it could for long conquer the principles upon which our Nation was founded. In such a grave reckoning, it was unavoidable that good men would be lost whatever their side.

To condemn R.E. Lee for defending a lost cause - lost because ultimately the antebellum South laid their moral foundation stone upon slavery - is to me the same as condemning the United States of America for having been born a nation which at the time still practiced/accepted slavery.

Not to be flippant, but I can look at this complex issue one of two ways: (a) fully condemn my country and heroes like Lee for being imperfect (as America's birth was, and Lee for supporting a morally doomed cause); or (b) give thanks that our Country & Constitution contained seeds of sufficient strength to ultimately remove this stain, even at such a bloody cost in human treasure.

I choose the latter, and give thanks to God that we survived as a nation... and I give prayers and a unique admiration for those men like Robert E. Lee who chose the wrong side, yet fought with honor and valor.

Robert E. Lee was a great American, and the certain shadow cast upon him for having fought to defend a confederacy that placed the hopes of its birth upon the right to treat men as property - though a lengthy shadow, to be sure - is not enough to cover the light within him.

After all is said and done, if another American of that day who lived through the horror of our Civil War could forgive his southern brothers "with malice towards none and charity for all" (Lincoln), then I can do no less.

CGVet58


79 posted on 01/19/2005 2:12:21 PM PST by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
The commentary was a warning to someone who doesn't understand the Dixie Ping list.

Jealous cause you're not on the Dixie Ping list.

80 posted on 01/19/2005 2:20:44 PM PST by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson