Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Richard Hatch Hit With Tax Evasion Rap (Did not report $1mm Survivor prize to IRS)
The Smoking Gun ^ | JANUARY 18

Posted on 01/18/2005 10:20:31 AM PST by presidio9

Richard Hatch, the first winner of CBS's "Survivor," was charged today with failing to report his $1 million reality TV windfall to the Internal Revenue Service. The below two-count criminal information, unsealed today in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island, charges Hatch with filing a false 2000 tax return that omitted his seven-figure "Survivor" winnings. The nudity enthusiast, 43, is also charged with filing a false return for 2001 (he allegedly did not report $321,000 paid to him by a Boston radio station). If convicted of the felony charges, Hatch could face a maximum of five years in prison for each count and could be hit with a $250,000 fine. Hatch is scheduled to be arraigned on the charges in Providence federal court January 24. (6 pages)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: hatch; pervert; queer; sodomite; survivor; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: presidio9

This is no excuse but, I have to wonder why CBS didn't do the withholding thing. Lotteries do it.


61 posted on 01/18/2005 10:54:53 AM PST by newgeezer (When encryption is outlawed, rwei qtjske ud alsx zkjwejruc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

I would consider a gay man who insisted on parading naked before me all the time to be guilty of sexual harassment.


62 posted on 01/18/2005 10:55:52 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: All

I don't see what the big deal is.

He will meet the IRS and bend over and take it... With a smile.


63 posted on 01/18/2005 10:58:05 AM PST by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It's too bad they closed Alcatraz.
He could use another island vacation.


64 posted on 01/18/2005 11:00:57 AM PST by WOSG (Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I'm going to see his first apperance this weekend on Sci-Fi...

The first one was "OK", but the second one is much better.

The quality of the new series is head and shoulders above the original, and certainly better than most of what passes for original SF these days (including the "Stargate" duo, and arguably "Star Trek"). It is every bit as good as "Farscape" was in it's heyday, and certainly rivals the best that Trek was able to offer in the early 90s (before Berman & Braga diluted and wrecked the franchise).

The stories are tightly written, the action is on point, and the effects are very well done.

There's one story that you will recognize as a complete rehash of an original BSG script (at least if you were even passably a fan of the original), and though it's OK, it is the one episode that I've not been overly impressed with.

I just pulled down Ep. 12 from SkyOne (it ran in the UK last night), and will watch it this evening, with high hopes for whatever cliffhanger they come up with next week (there's only 13 episides in season one). SciFi has already given a green light to season two, but of course, we'll most likely have to wait until late fall before we get to see those episodes.

65 posted on 01/18/2005 11:03:03 AM PST by mhking (Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kornev
Yeah, I try to erase Galactica 1980 from my mind.

Draino usually works for that... [g]

66 posted on 01/18/2005 11:04:10 AM PST by mhking (Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mhking; All

The first one I saw was 33.. Which I had to admit it was a good episode. Shooting down your own vessel not knowing if there are civilans on the ship or not was intense. Water was ok. I'm still going to wait and see what happens..


67 posted on 01/18/2005 11:06:24 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Criminal tax cases are usually prosecuted by the Tax Division of the Department of Justice and not by the IRS. THe IRS special agents usually do the investigation, but the actual prosecution is handled by the Department of Justice. The standard of proof is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Even if he is convicted of a tax crime, he is still liable for the tax. He could also be charged with the civil fraud penalty, which is equal to 75 percent of the tax not paid due to fraud. The IRS bears the burden of proving civil fraud by the standard of clear and convicing evidence, which is a lower standard of proof than guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The courts have held that the civil fraud penalty is more remedial than punitive. Therefore, being assessed the civil fraud penalty after a criminal conviction does not violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment.

68 posted on 01/18/2005 11:10:35 AM PST by TheCPA (Revision Editor of CCH Financial and Estate Planning Guide, 14th edition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wasn't he the proclaimed homosexual? Nice to see that his ethics match his financial witholdings to the IRS.
69 posted on 01/18/2005 11:11:12 AM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"I told you I'd get even for rubbing up against me, Richard. Us truck drivers have lots of contacts at the IRS, by golly."

70 posted on 01/18/2005 11:19:42 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

Did you know that you can avoid federal income taxes more than three years old via bankruptcy?


71 posted on 01/18/2005 11:21:41 AM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Yeah. He didn't report the incoem from that gig, either.


72 posted on 01/18/2005 11:22:17 AM PST by Freemyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Is he the gay guy? Jail should be fun.


73 posted on 01/18/2005 11:22:57 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; TheCPA

My thoughts too.

Why wasnt half of this withheld when they gave him his check?
What state does he live in...they'll want their cut too.


74 posted on 01/18/2005 11:55:08 AM PST by wallcrawlr (www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy; Pan_Yans Wife
Did you know that you can avoid federal income taxes more than three years old via bankruptcy?

This is a criminal case, not a civil action to collect back taxes. Bankruptcy won't help, and any deal will likely require at least a deferred adjudication, if not a guilty plea. They probably want the example as much as they want the money in this case.

The time to make the deal is before the criminal charges appear.

75 posted on 01/18/2005 12:12:26 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Is he the gay guy? Jail should be fun.

"Down the Hatch!!!

76 posted on 01/18/2005 12:14:49 PM PST by quark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Yes, I think you are right. If he had not filed a return at all he would be on stronger legal footing. A return is a binding contract - no return is nothing.


77 posted on 01/18/2005 12:22:42 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TheCPA
That's why this news article doesn't make any sense. It seems too obvious and leaves out a lot of other information. For all we know, he might be claiming that he earned the income overseas. Also, if the IRS wasn't going to buy that line, he would have known during the audit process and probably made a settlement offer.

I can't believe anyone is so stupid that they (1) outright 'forgot' to report $1.1m in well publicized income, (2) rejected all IRS settlement offers , and (3) was willing to take on a criminal case.

78 posted on 01/18/2005 12:25:58 PM PST by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

"They'll cut him a good deal."

I don't think so. I think they'll make an example of him (remember Wllie Nelson?). They have to show that scofflaws will be prosecuted so others, particularly entertainers and athletes, don't try the same thing.


79 posted on 01/18/2005 12:28:32 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Lefty Suicide Hotline: 1-800-BUSH-WON (thanks PJ-Comix!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

IF he approached them first, in good faith, they would cut a deal.

But, it doesn't sound like he is taking the easy way out in this.

The tax evadars that I have known in the past, were always told, WORK WITH US, and this will be less painful.

I don't know what legal advice Hatch has received, but the matter could have been cleared up, easier.


80 posted on 01/18/2005 12:33:03 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (" It is not true that life is one damn thing after another-it's one damn thing over and over." ESV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson