NEW HAMPSHIRE INTRODUCES RESOLUTION TO GET US OUT OF UN (Claims U.N. violates State's rights.)

New Hampshire Senate ^

[paul51]

I can't believe it's coming out of a liberal state

Liberal? I wish I was living in such a 'liberal' state.

[SeaBiscuit]

Thanks for posting this.

Surprise from NH but I'll take it, would love to see this get some long legs!!

[MeekOneGOP]

:^D

[Happy2BMe]

BTTTT

(Thanks for that post.)

[television is just wrong]

This discussion has been going on for most of my life, is this for real?

[nicmarlo]

yw bump, happy! : )

[tutstar]

My memory? They were a blue state?

[Happy2BMe]

"My memory? They (New Hampshire) were a blue state?"

=========================================

Whose got the red/blue election map?

[MeekOneGOP]

Whose got the red/blue election map?

This one?

[henderson field]

Maybe New Hampshire remembers what's on its license plates: Live free or die.

[potlatch]

Great idea and I hope other states take up the 'call'.

[Happy2BMe]

#89

(How blue is New Hampshire?)

Thanks MeekOneGop!

[Gilbo_3]

and that would leave us in the awful geo-political position of having surrendered our UN veto, to boot. We'd be out of the UN, but everyone else would still be in it. Every anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli UN resolution would pass with super-majorities at that point.

Who cares and Who will enforce the un-resolutions???

We would be able to form an effective 21st century coalition that, as stated before, could and should be transparent and fair, as well as lead to the brightest future for the world and the USA

stayin in the un is only prolonging the inevitable, unless we are planning to lose anyways...

[Southack]

"Who cares and Who will enforce the un-resolutions???"

China, France, Germany, Africa, sometimes Russia, and the entire Middle-East would be happy to enforce UN resolutions against Israeli travel abroad, against American businesses abroad, and against Christianity in general.

American isolationism is simply NOT an option; especially as long as we are importing oil.

So merely "leaving" the UN is not a viable option. You've got to come up with a 100% certain method of eliminating the UN prior to the U.S. giving up its UN veto power.

Not after. Before. The UN has to be gone BEFORE the U.S. gives up that veto power.

[paul51]

In 2000 NH went red. In 2004, kerry took the state by less than 10,000 votes.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

This is much larger than most people think. NOTE: Hew Hampshire helps shape issues in the primary.

No matter how the vote turns out, this resolution will bring NH attention toward UN scandals. Any conservative who brings up UN scandals during the primaries, and perhaps even right now, praising those legislators bringing this issue up, will be encouraged by this state.

FReegards....

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

"All that withdrawing the U.S. from the UN would accomplish would be to surrender our UN veto while yielding global diplomacy to the whims of the French and Chinese." That's an interesting point. But what exactly could the UN do to us if we kick them out and save 10s of billions of dollars? I imagine they would threaten economic sanctions. Ah... world wide recession or worse, possibly. The UN is, indeed, selfish enough to cause that. And I suppose they could.

Do we keep feeding this monster? Do we negotiate to save money? Do we even lift a finger when the World Court arrests a US citizen for a 'crime against nature'?

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

So you are saying that US businesses overseas could be gobbled up. That would crash the stock market. You make good points. Well done. I've been one of the strongest anti-UN hawks around, but you are correct. We must UNDERMINE this evil. We must slash its credibility, expose it's scandals, criticize its wasteful spending, and grind it down to dust. Nonetheless, we've been excellent cats' paws about that process. What's going on in NH is getting peoples' attention. It's not all bad, so long as it does not get out of hand.

[An.American.Expatriate]

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Five

For this one sentance alone, the ACLU will urge the courts to find this resolution unconstitutional . . .

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

On the other hand, I'm not so certain that the US can veto abosoutely everything.