Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
and that would leave us in the awful geo-political position of having surrendered our UN veto, to boot. We'd be out of the UN, but everyone else would still be in it. Every anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli UN resolution would pass with super-majorities at that point.

Who cares and Who will enforce the un-resolutions???

We would be able to form an effective 21st century coalition that, as stated before, could and should be transparent and fair, as well as lead to the brightest future for the world and the USA

stayin in the un is only prolonging the inevitable, unless we are planning to lose anyways...

93 posted on 01/16/2005 9:20:35 PM PST by Gilbo_3 (Patience is a virtue, but it aint one of mine !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Gilbo_3
"Who cares and Who will enforce the un-resolutions???"

China, France, Germany, Africa, sometimes Russia, and the entire Middle-East would be happy to enforce UN resolutions against Israeli travel abroad, against American businesses abroad, and against Christianity in general.

American isolationism is simply NOT an option; especially as long as we are importing oil.

So merely "leaving" the UN is not a viable option. You've got to come up with a 100% certain method of eliminating the UN prior to the U.S. giving up its UN veto power.

Not after. Before. The UN has to be gone BEFORE the U.S. gives up that veto power.

94 posted on 01/16/2005 9:30:12 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson