Posted on 01/14/2005 7:40:10 PM PST by RWR8189
I CALLED UP Brian Anderson yesterday to ask him a few questions about his forthcoming book, South Park Conservatives: The Revolt Against Liberal Media Bias.
Anderson is a senior editor at City Journal. He's typical of an increasingly influential type of journalist, the full-time, on-staff, journal journalist who, paid by a think tank like the Manhattan Institute or the Ethics and Public Policy Center, has the time and space to work on policy articles for months at a time before having to pull the trigger on a finished piece. The result is a densely fortified style of reporting and argumentation that puts to shame mainstream journalism's call-and-quote product. Anderson's City Journal colleague, Heather Mac Donald, is another fine example of the breed, as are, from the younger set, the writers over at the New Atlantis, a journal of technology edited by STANDARD contributor Eric Cohen.
But it's not for any disquisition on urban policy or essay of political philosophy (a subject in which he has a Ph.D.) that Anderson has lately achieved a modest but growing measure of public known-ness. It is for a very nice bit of trend reporting, his Autumn 2003 article We're Not Losing the Culture Wars Anymore, which introduced a great number of online readers to the phrase South Park Conservative.
A coinage of Andrew Sullivan's, the South Park Conservative is, like the hit Comedy Central show from Matt Stone and Trey Parker, opposed to political correctness and more likely to ridicule than observe the guidelines of the new sensitivity concerning race, ethnicity, minorities, women, the handicapped, obesity, homosexuality, ugliness, religion, childhood, and much, much, much else. The show, according to Anderson's thesis, is typical of how the culture is shifting to a more critical attitude toward liberal media and its firmly held pieties. (City Journalhas just pre-published the final chapter of the book in its latest issue.)
My first, not really serious, question is whether Anderson in his book tries to write Andrew Sullivan out of the movement. (After seeing the especially tame WEEKLY STANDARD cover this week of a gay Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Sullivan had a reaction that can only be described as, well, politically correct.) "Andrew has become increasingly liberal," Anderson allows, but no, he isn't trying to kick him out. He does say that Sullivan, in his usage, "incorporates the notion of social liberalism," while Anderson himself is not only more conservative, but he believes that, at its core, South Park the show is, also, culturally conservative.
The idea for Anderson's article, he says, originated in the offices of City Journal, where editor Myron Magnet and members of the staff were trying to get a read on the meaning of the rise of Fox News, the blog-supported resignation of ultra-liberal New York Times editor Howell Raines, the incredible traffic at Drudge and other websites not particularly friendly to the left-wing hierarchy of the mainstream media. Even before Rathergate, a lot was going on that suggested a major shift away from the "monolithic liberalism of the mainstream media." (And, yes, there was a time before Rathergate: I remember well that sweet predawn era of complete faith in the words of that great, noble, manly, truth-telling newsreader.)
Is South Park conservatism exclusively a young phenomenon? Well, Anderson says, "a lot of the older conservatives just don't get it." But some do. Bill Bennett, says Anderson, called after reading the article. Bennett's kids were South Park fans and had been encouraging him to give it a try. And so he did, finding the show clearly anti-liberal. (No word yet on Bennett's opinion of Team America: World Police.) But, yes, South Park conservatism is especially big among young conservatives, says Anderson, who are more comfortable with the new "more flippant tone" and the new technologies.
Anderson talked with "several dozen" conservative students for his book. "They weren't young George Wills, they weren't young Bill Buckleys." They wore jeans and listened to iPods nonstop, but were intensely pro-life. But less conservative than their older counterparts on gay marriage, where they didn't object to the idea of civil unions for gays. As for the war on terror, they were very pro-Bush.
Is there a downside to the rise of South Park conservatism? I ask. "It can be," as its critics claim Anderson notes, "kind of nihilistic, profane, and vulgar." And, of course, "it will offend a lot of people." But, he says, "the biggest danger is that the activism and the attitude might replace an engagement with ideas."
Anderson continues: "You don't want to see it as a whole ethos of life. . . . If there weren't any respect for higher culture, it wouldn't be conservatism."
David Skinner is an assistant managing editor at The Weekly Standard and runs the blog Galley Slaves.
Damn You for making me sing along. Now, it is running through my head. I'm gonna kick you in the nuts!
Oh, I don't know if it was the best song...I thought the best was "America, F--- Yeah" [bummer version]. It just started and I could not stop laughing.
I hope they made a lot of money on that movie.
I plan on buying a few DVD's when it is released, but I don't think the movie did very well at the box office.
Ha! On what planet?
Haven't seen Team America yet, but i'm sure I'll like for the simple reason Sean Penn hates it.
http://www.drudgereport.com/penn.htm
"I'mmmm sailinnnng awayyyyy..."
then don't read post 27
Saw the end of that one. It looked like political correctness was going to break out, until that Mormon kid said some variation of "blow me." I just about died laughing.
Oh, and Go Pats!
There are many, many more people who consider themselves religious conservatives who would absolutely love to ban this show.
Whereas the greatest danger comes from the left, don't forget on occassion to look over your right shoulder as well.
setanopencourseforthevirginsea
I’vegottobefree,
freetofacethelife
that’saheadofme
Onboard,I’mthecaptain,
soclimbaboard
We’llsearchfortomorrow
oneveryshore
AndI’lltry,
ohlord,
I’lltry
tocarryon...
LOL
Bump to that being true.
Unfortunately.
ARRGGHHH, I just HAD to read it!
Consider that stolen. Thanks.
I hate it when I come to a thread where posts have already been pulled ;~D
Big bump to that,
Been there, done that....
Conservatives had the image of being stiff and stuffed shirts. South Park puts the lie to it.
My favorite episode is when the NAMBLA group comes to town.
One of the NAMBLA members makes an impassioned speech about being a victimized minority and being different.
One of the kids takes center stage and says "You have sex with children."
Dang. The culture wars article is LONNNNNNGGGGG.
But, it sounds interesting...will have to try to find the time to read it between studying nuclear physics...lol.
I have tastes in music and film and whatnot that is considered to be incongrous with conservatism. So many people who know me casually are often surprised, when they get to know me better, to find out what a staunch conservative I am. For somebody who likes movies like Pulp Fiction, reads a lot of sociology books and has everything Pearl Jam ever recorded is not usually associated with the conservative movement. So there you go.
When South Park first came out, I dismissed it as another one of those insipid TV shows like "Beavis & Butthead." But one night when I was flipping channels, I came across an episode as it was first starting and decided to check it out (after having heard mention of it so much on Free Republic). I never laughed so hard in my life. What a clever show! It was the episode where the kids got taken to the rain forest by the Birkenstock-clad, bearded teacher. Good stuff. I've watched a few episodes since then and sometimes it goes a little overboard, but the writers continue to come up with great material to satirize.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.