Skip to comments.
10,000 same-day registrations in Milwaukee illegible
Mark Belling - WISN AM ^
Posted on 01/14/2005 3:01:13 PM PST by steveegg
Edited on 01/14/2005 3:19:12 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: steveegg
I am absolutely convinced that the Dems stole Wisconsin's electoral votes in 2004 and in 2000.
Same-day registration must end. More importantly, a requirement that a voter present a driver's license (or a state-issued "non-driver's license" for those who don't drive), and that the license numbers be keyed in to prevent multiple voting, doesn't seem too opprobrious to me.
Not that I, as a resident of North Carolina, am in any position to criticize Wisconsin's setup. The procedure here is to state your name and address, period. You are then good to go with your vote. The potential for abuse is obvious: I could pick a name out of the phone book, remember the address, and vote in a precinct on the other side of the county -- and then go to my precinct, and cast a "legitimate" vote.
Why are there more safeguards involved with my purchase of a book from Amazon.com than there are with my vote? Which transaction is more important?
41
posted on
01/14/2005 4:14:07 PM PST
by
southernnorthcarolina
(OK, Congress is back in session -- Where's my tax cuts for the rich? )
To: Timeout; snugs
fyi
"... there are now more registered voters in Milwaukee [Wisconsin] than there are adults in Milwaukee."
42
posted on
01/14/2005 4:18:09 PM PST
by
GretchenM
(It remains to be seen what God will do through a person who gives Him all the glory.)
To: steveegg
2 Presidential elections in a row with a third of the voters simply showing up at the polls the day of to register. Houston, we have a problem. Did this happen in Houston, too?
Just kidding.
43
posted on
01/14/2005 4:19:25 PM PST
by
GretchenM
(It remains to be seen what God will do through a person who gives Him all the glory.)
To: ride the whirlwind
44
posted on
01/14/2005 4:19:56 PM PST
by
GretchenM
(It remains to be seen what God will do through a person who gives Him all the glory.)
To: prairiebreeze
If winning is all you are right. They've won, so no problem. I'm afraid the republicans have become too politically correct to care if it gets fixed or not.
45
posted on
01/14/2005 4:20:02 PM PST
by
JustAnotherSavage
(Government spends what government receives plus as much as it can get away with-Milton Friedman)
To: southernnorthcarolina
Not that I, as a resident of North Carolina, am in any position to criticize Wisconsin's setup. The procedure here is to state your name and address, period. You are then good to go with your vote. Same here, so complain away.
Why are there more safeguards involved with my purchase of a book from Amazon.com than there are with my vote? Which transaction is more important?
Because the latter actually involves power, something the DemonRATs can't obtain legitimately.
46
posted on
01/14/2005 4:30:01 PM PST
by
steveegg
(The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
To: MisterRepublican
Yes, let's talk about "election reform", Democrats. INDEED. These Democrat Fraud Freaks are showing just how pathetically ignorant they are by calling for voter reform. Democrats have been stealing elections for years with impunity.
MM
47
posted on
01/14/2005 4:32:25 PM PST
by
MississippiMan
(Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
To: republicandiva
Anytime! I was just glad to do something to help, since my own state was such a lost cause.
To: steveegg
I see the potential to convict about 20000 to 40000 individuals here of federal election fraud, a felony, and even without them doing a day in jail or being fined, they would be stricken from the voter roles forever. Wouldn't that be a nice present for 2008?
49
posted on
01/14/2005 4:50:07 PM PST
by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
To: Magnum44
I see the potential to convict about 20000 to 40000 individuals here of federal election fraud, a felony, and even without them doing a day in jail or being fined, they would be stricken from the voter roles forever. Wouldn't that be a nice present for 2008? Slight problem; in Wisconsin, once their sentence is up (both jail and probation), they're back on the voter rolls. What you can do with convictions is bar them from public office (and there's a few of those that need to be prosecuted).
50
posted on
01/14/2005 4:54:38 PM PST
by
steveegg
(The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
To: pitbully
51
posted on
01/14/2005 4:58:38 PM PST
by
granite
To: FreeKeys
In Oklahoma all absentee ballots are required to have the voter's signature notarized. They are tossed if submitted without notarized signatures.
52
posted on
01/14/2005 5:00:19 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Increase Republicans in Congress in 2006!)
To: Mo1
Mark Belling was talking about this the day before the election, on simulcast of his radio show on CSPAN. He warned this was going to happen.
53
posted on
01/14/2005 5:06:30 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(PEST/Suicide Hotline 1-800-BUSH-WON)
To: PhiKapMom
In Oklahoma all absentee ballots are required to have the voter's signature notarized. They are tossed if submitted without notarized signatures.That's the way they do it here in Montana as well. I voted absentee in 1990 at the Clerk & Recorders Office and the County Clerk notarized my ballot for me before I voted.
54
posted on
01/14/2005 5:10:53 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(PEST/Suicide Hotline 1-800-BUSH-WON)
To: patriot_wes
"....I smell a RAT!"
Ismell 84,000 RATS!
To: Sister_T
Jesse bused them in from chicago.
Ops4 God Bless America!
56
posted on
01/14/2005 5:19:32 PM PST
by
OPS4
(worth repeating)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Unfortunately, until we're able to change the laws in Wisconsin, it's going to be nearly impossible to prevent this type of fraud, and the RATS know it! We had armies of pollwatchers, HAVA pollwatchers and HAVA attorneys watching everything on election day. Some of the same-day registrations were challenged, but for the most part, not much we can do, legally, because of the lenient laws. Attempts to get voter i.d. through have been vetoed by our RAT governor, with an insufficient number supporting the legislation to override the veto.
To: PhiKapMom
What about military ballots? Do we ban military ballots unless we send notaries to the troops? Or are there notaries in a war zone?
58
posted on
01/14/2005 5:24:01 PM PST
by
dufekin
(Four more years! Liberals, learn: whiners are losers every time.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
As I have said in my tagline for two months...
59
posted on
01/14/2005 5:26:40 PM PST
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
No, our federal law enforcement personnel are out looking for people who put bayonets on Chinese SKS rifles, or saw the barrels of their shotguns to 17 3/4" long. The real criminals in our society, you know.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-229 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson