Posted on 01/10/2005 2:47:28 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
Antony Flew, the 81-year-old British philosophy professor who taught at Oxford and other leading universities, became an atheist at age 15. Throughout his long career he arguedincluding in debates with an atheist-turned-Christian named C. S. Lewisthat there was a presumption of atheism, that is, the existence of a creator could not be proved.
But hes now been forced to face the evidence. It comes from the Intelligent Design movement, led by Dr. Phillip Johnson and particularly the work of Michael Behe, the Lehigh biochemist who has proven the irreducible complexity of the human cell structure. Though eighty-one years old, Flew has not let his thinking fossilize, but has faithfully followed his own dictum to go where the evidence leads.
Christian philosophy professor Gary Habermas of Liberty University conducted an interview with Flew that will be published in the winter issue of Philosophia Christi, the journal of the Evangelical Philosophical Society and Biola University. Flew told Habermas that a pivotal point in his thinking was when he realized two major flaws in the various theories of how nature might have created itself. First, he recognized that evolutionary theory has no reasonable explanation for the first emergence of living from non-living matterthat is, the origin of life. Second, even if a living cell or primitive animal had somehow assembled itself from non-living chemicals, he reasoned it would have no ability to reproduce.
Flew told Habermas, This is the creature, the evolution of which a truly comprehensive theory of evolution must give some account. Darwin himself was well aware that he had not produced such an account. It now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design.
Flew has, thus, become a Deistthat is, he acknowledges God as creator but not as a personal deity. In his opinion, There is no room either for any supernatural revelation of that God or any transactions between that God and individual human beings. In fact, he told a group last May that he considers both the Christian God and the Islamic God to be omnipotent Oriental despotscosmic Saddam Husseins.
But a crack is beginning to develop in his opinion that God hasnt spoken through Scripture. When he reads the first chapter of Genesis, Flew says hes impressed that a book written thousands of years ago harmonizes with twenty-first-century science. That this biblical account might be scientifically accurate, says Flew, raises the possibility that it is revelation. A book containing factual statements that no human knew about at the time of writing seems to argue that the authors must have had coaching from the Creator.
The evidence is there for all who will look, as his one-time adversary C. S. Lewis discovered, and as more and more thinking intellectuals are discovering today. So it is that Antony Flew, perhaps the most famous philosopher of atheism, is just a step or two away from the kingdom.
Which means all of the witty observations (like "old atheists get religion chuckle chuckle") are crap.
Or a species with part of a sex organ that will be a sex organ in 50 million years.
There should be many species with Frankenstein like, not yet usable characteristics that are future legs, eyes, sex organs and not the bird with some bone that looks similar to a flying dinosaur bone.
You really don't understand evolution, Do you
But this might quailify
After all, we cannot turn from a fish into a horse in one generation. It takes millions of years. How long did it take for a seahorse to become a horse?
Please tell me you are joking
As the order of water vapor goes to the disorder of six sided snowflakes. No, wait.... computing.....
You'd best leave the science to the scientists, and let the quacks selling videos and books on ID go their own way. This has been debunked so many times it's silly.
Did you really intend to direct your statement toward me?
He doesn't seem to know much at all about biology (or natural sciences in general), but that doesn't stop him from proclaiming himself expert enough to "know" that evolution is clearly false.
"I am an atheist, but I know better than to claim that there is no God"
Then you are not an atheist.
The definition of atheism is that you affirmatively believe in the absence of any God--regardless of definition.
No, the definition of atheism is the abscence of theism. A = without, theism = belief in a god or gods. Atheism = without belief in a god or gods. I do not believe in any deities, therefore I am an atheist.
"No, the definition of atheism is the abscence of theism. A = without, theism = belief in a god or gods. Atheism = without belief in a god or gods. I do not believe in any deities, therefore I am an atheist."
If you were to literally translate from Latin, you would be correct.
But the meaning of the word 'atheism' is not equivalent to the literal Latin translation.
You may want to learn about this before you proclaim yourself as an atheist.
If you are "without belief in a god or gods", then a more fitting term would be agnostic. That is, "without knowing". Meaning that you do not commit yourself to the affirmative belief in the existence or the non-existence of a god or gods.
I forgive you for supporting a silly cult.
Come on sig! Don't you know that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is the only half way scientific argument the creationists have? ;-)
"there has been *no* study of creation,"
There has been no study of creationism, because it is misinterpretation of the Bible, not science.
There has been study of the Big Bang hypothesis (which is not in the Theory of Evolution)
"In the mean time, the answer is there for all those who will open their eyes that God created Evolution, which solves all the contradictions of science vs. Genesis in one swell foop."
That is what I believe (indirectly from let there be light), but the creationists imply that I am going to H E double hockey sticks. LOL
"Its just I would feel better about the theory if I knew where the first life came from."
I hope the fact that the Theory of Evolution does not include creation of first life comforts you.
An agnostic doesn't know whether a god exists. An atheist prays that God doesn't exist. ;-)
Regarding G-d, there is no evidence, only faith and conjecture. On this earth, that is all anyone has regarding the question of G-d.
Most of these bitter replies from creationists are based on plagarism from creationist crap sites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.