Posted on 01/03/2005 6:57:54 AM PST by DouglasKC
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
One of the most popular and familiar pieces of evidence used to bolster the theory of evolution reproduced for decades in most high school and college biology textbooks is fraudulent, and has been known to be fraudulent for nearly 100 years.
Most people have seen those drawings of developing human embryos next to developing animal embryos, and they look virtually indistinguishable. (The Haeckel embryo sequence shown purported to show left to right a hog, calf, rabbit and human). This has long been said to demonstrate that humans share a common ancestry with these animals and thus prove the theory of evolution.
These pictures were designed by German zoologist Ernst Haeckel. What few people know and one of many surprises in the evolution debate reported in the July edition of Whistleblower magazine (formerly WorldNet) is that they were fakes. At Jena, the university where he taught, Haeckel was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a university court. His deceit was exposed in "Haeckels Frauds and Forgeries," a 1915 book by J. Assmuth and Ernest R. Hull, who quoted 19 leading authorities of the day.
![]() Ernst Haeckel |
"It clearly appears that Haeckel has in many cases freely invented embryos, or reproduced the illustrations given by others in a substantially changed form," said anatomist F. Keibel of Freiburg University. Zoologist L. Rütimeyer of Basle University called his distorted drawings "a sin against scientific truthfulness."
Yet, despite Haeckels fraud conviction and early exposure, Western educators continued using the pictures for decades as proof of the theory of evolution.
The matter was settled with finality by Dr. Michael Richardson, an embryologist at St. Georges Medical School in London. He found there was no record that anyone ever actually checked Haeckels claims by systematically comparing human and other fetuses during development. So Richardson assembled a scientific team that did just that photographing the growing embryos of 39 different species.
In a 1997 interview in The Times of London, Dr. Richardson stated: "This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. Its shocking to find that somebody one thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It makes me angry. ... What he [Haeckel] did was to take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same at the same stage of development. They dont. ... These are fakes."
Today believe it or not Haeckels drawings still appear in many high school and college textbooks. Among them are "Evolutionary Biology" by Douglas J. Futuyma (Third Edition, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 1998), and also the bedrock text, "Molecular Biology of the Cell" (third edition), whose authors include biochemist Dr. Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences.
Haeckels fraudulent drawings are just one of evolutions pillars now under spectacular scientific assault. There are many others.
I recall it too... so what should the drawings or photos look like, I wonder?
I think this thread refers to the line "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny".
In the sense that the human embryo shows rather generalized structural similarities with "lower" species during the stages of embryonic development, the statement is correct.
Little to wonder about here, given that nearly all DNA is the same in a chimp and a man.
What is important is the difference, both in gross embryological structure, and in the DNA controlling the process of embryological development.
Suggestion: One is well advised to fully comprehend one's karma, lest it run over one's dogma.
That the similarity of embryos is still asserted as evidence of evolution is amazing, if true. Haeckle's theory was dismissed almost a century ago, as the article states.
Beats me. Obviously not as close as these otherwise there would have been no need to fake them.
As I said, I clearly remember seeing this pictures being taught as fact when I went to school (in the 70's). It's quite amazing.
|
I am advised that humans and oranges are 70% similar in terms of DNA.
Oh, yeah ... Heackle called it "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny", which of course means that the development of the embryo is a replay of that organism's evolutionary ancestry.
Do you know of any place that has actual comparision photos of pig, rabbit, human, etc. embryos?
I just wanted to comment on this subject. My 3rd grade grandson informed us yesterday while we were watching Free Willy with him that whales used to have legs and arms. They turned into fins. He learned it in school. My husband just told him that the whales must have decided to trade in their limbs for fins because Noah didn't want any whales on his boat. They had to learn to swim. Just thought it was funny and felt like sharing.
Not that I've seen. I'm sure it's out there, but it would take some time to locate. A good project for you.
Nice story. It's amazing how fast kids are indoctrinated with evolutionary theory.
I'll see what I can do. I was kind of surprised that the article you linked to didn't have actual comparasions. It would have seemed like it was the logical thing to do considering the content.
One guy fudges data and people latch onto that like it's the end all. If that were to happen with every fraudulent preacher, religion would have died out a very long time ago.
Of course, the mountains of real evolutionary evidence are dismissed with a hand wave.
Me too.
The enemy of truth is an enemy of God.
Indeed, whales were once land mammals.
Why don't we also drop gravitational and atomic theory while we are at it.
Hmmm... I wonder how long it would take to march back to the dark ages.
Are we recycling 2001?
Here I was getting all excited about the 100th anniversary of Special Relativity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.