(hopping up and down in my chair, arm raised)...
Posted on 01/01/2005 3:36:30 AM PST by Lindykim
In a recent debate between myself and some radical homosexuals, one of them asked me, by way of refutation whose implicit intentions were to convince me that I am a 'hateful homophobe' and also to persuade me that homosexual behavior is a 'natural orientation," if and when I had 'chosen' to be heterosexual. "Was it at age 3, 6, 13, 19?" he asked, "Or did you (a female) just 'naturally' gravitate towards boys or men without any outside pressure or force?"
My response:
There was no 'choice'........there was never any question........it simply occured as naturally as breathing air. Now for yourself, 'something' occured that interfered with your natural progression towards manhood that, in effect, stunted this natural process in much the same way as a baby duck can have its natural progression towards becoming a mature duck interfered with. This usually occurs when a human causes the chick to imprint upon the human rather than upon an adult duck. So does the 'interference' with natural progression make the baby duck into something other than a duck? That the chick seems to believe itself to be, and even tries to be human make it human in fact? Of course not. It's still a duck in every sense of what it means to be a duck. Just as you are still a heterosexual despite that you believe you are 'something else'.
Should duck society and the laws of nature by which that society exists be overturned and forced to become upside-down in order to accomodate improperly imprinted ducks? Of course not. That would be insane. Just as it is dangerously insane for "improperly imprinted" human beings to demand that heterosexual society and the laws of nature by which it needs to exist should be turned upside-down in order to accomodate them.
What happened to the duck was wrong. What happened to you was not just wrong, but horribly tragic. However, for the greater good of our civilization, you and others like you should not be advocating that society and the innocence of childhood be swept aside and made to accept that "improper imprintation" is somehow a 'good' thing. Although you ardently wish to pretend otherwise, you do know deep down inside yourself that it isn't.
What you should be doing.......for the GOOD of all mankind and most especially for children........is learning {gaining wisdom} from your suffering in order that you can PREVENT what happened to you from happening to other children. That would be not just love, but agape, the highest form of love........love that calls for self-denial and self-sacrifice for the good of others
You could have made an effort.
[J/K - LOL!]
My words were unduly harsh and knee jerk reactionary. Please accept my apology.
And cheap at half the price!
[P.S. to all: To help keep the wisecracks coming, become a monthly donor.]
CNN sent a reporter to Key West for the news years celebration.
They had a choice of THREE parties to show.
1. A giant lighted Conch Shell being lowered from a flag pole. (giant as in REALLY BIG)
2. A very pretty live woman being lowered from the mast of a Pirate Ship. (actually the pirate museum and its a real naturally born woman)
3. A man dressed like a woman, a very ugly woman, sitting is a giant red woman's high heal shoe chair.
Soooo which one did CNN show? Four gueses and the first three don't count.
accepted.
Unless humanes have become asexual any species that is in capable of procreating is self diminishing, hence unnatural.
Why are you asking him? It seems clear that "homosexuals" exist only as an abstract concept in his mind. It's not at all clear he's ever met or had any sort of social relationships with actual gay people.
"These questions seem like a choice is involved. It is my opinion that homosexuality is learned behavior."
Until 15 or 20 years ago gays called their behavior an "alternative livestyle choice". When it became politically advantageous, gays started saying their behavior was NOT a choice. My guess is that a fair percentage of gays result from abnormal hormonal exposure in the womb. Another large percentage probably arise from childhood trauma (usually sex abuse).
Think of the vainglorious king in the 'Kings' New Clothes,' and then imagine how utterly shocked he'd be if he discovered that instead of being adorned in the finest garments he really was naked after all. The homosexuals shocked reaction was like that. There was one feeble "but you don't understand," and then silence. Not only did they shut up, but they quit the thread. That's the power of truth.
Since she was very young when it all happened I did allow her to be with him on weekends. I made it very clear that if she ever mentioned witnessing any lewd behavior between him and any of his "friends" that it would be the end of his visitation. As I found out much later, that was a mistake, but since I didn't have proof of what I had found I didn't have a lot of choice. I monitored things very closely and when she was about 12 she started talking about some things she was seeing. We went back to court and his visitation rights were taken away. She understood the reason and I think she was glad that we did that. The whole thing was much more devastating for her than it was for me. That's another reason I think they should not be allowed to adopt. She developed some issues and had to have some professional counseling but we got to her in time, almost. I had remarried by that time and my husband legally adopted her. She's not as open about it as I am because she's afraid people will assume that it's inherited and she might be that way. Even with the counseling she did get pregnant (not married) and one reason was because she thought if she had a baby nobody would accuse her of being like him. This whole situation causes all kinds of problems. I believe good can come out of anything though. I was upset about the pregnancy but we gave her an acre of land and she put a nice mobile home on it just 500 feet from our house so that she could be independent but we would be close enough to take care of them. I have the most precious granddaughter that God ever put on this earth and I can't imagine life without her. My daughter has a wonderful boyfriend now and is doing fine.
That's the reason that I don't hate them. I actually pity them and if I had a child or friend that was trending that way I would at least get them help from a Christian psychiatrist. I still don't want to associate with them (unless they genuinely want help) or have them around children.
bttt
Have you ever noticed Donald Duck spoke with a lisp?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.