Posted on 01/01/2005 3:36:30 AM PST by Lindykim
In a recent debate between myself and some radical homosexuals, one of them asked me, by way of refutation whose implicit intentions were to convince me that I am a 'hateful homophobe' and also to persuade me that homosexual behavior is a 'natural orientation," if and when I had 'chosen' to be heterosexual. "Was it at age 3, 6, 13, 19?" he asked, "Or did you (a female) just 'naturally' gravitate towards boys or men without any outside pressure or force?"
My response:
There was no 'choice'........there was never any question........it simply occured as naturally as breathing air. Now for yourself, 'something' occured that interfered with your natural progression towards manhood that, in effect, stunted this natural process in much the same way as a baby duck can have its natural progression towards becoming a mature duck interfered with. This usually occurs when a human causes the chick to imprint upon the human rather than upon an adult duck. So does the 'interference' with natural progression make the baby duck into something other than a duck? That the chick seems to believe itself to be, and even tries to be human make it human in fact? Of course not. It's still a duck in every sense of what it means to be a duck. Just as you are still a heterosexual despite that you believe you are 'something else'.
Should duck society and the laws of nature by which that society exists be overturned and forced to become upside-down in order to accomodate improperly imprinted ducks? Of course not. That would be insane. Just as it is dangerously insane for "improperly imprinted" human beings to demand that heterosexual society and the laws of nature by which it needs to exist should be turned upside-down in order to accomodate them.
What happened to the duck was wrong. What happened to you was not just wrong, but horribly tragic. However, for the greater good of our civilization, you and others like you should not be advocating that society and the innocence of childhood be swept aside and made to accept that "improper imprintation" is somehow a 'good' thing. Although you ardently wish to pretend otherwise, you do know deep down inside yourself that it isn't.
What you should be doing.......for the GOOD of all mankind and most especially for children........is learning {gaining wisdom} from your suffering in order that you can PREVENT what happened to you from happening to other children. That would be not just love, but agape, the highest form of love........love that calls for self-denial and self-sacrifice for the good of others
It's simple when you understand that men are visually-oriented. One girl = good, two girls = better. When guys see two naked girls, they fantasize about joining them in a three-way
"May I see your wife's credentials?"
My wife is a psychiatrist.
Have you ever noticed that a gay man's best friend will usually be a woman?? I've always believed they are sexually attracted to them, but to admit that would be to deny their homosexuality. This could also explain their fascination with Judy Garland ;)
As someone with a gay brother, I can tell you that there is no person I, or anyone in our family, could count on more in a time of need.
Agreed.
Women are visually-oriented, also, to a lesser extent.
Why don't women get sexually excited by two men engaging in a sex act? It's as repulsive to most women as it is to heterosexual men.
Possibly.
I'd like to believe so because that would mean a latent desire on their part to be heterosexual.
I suppose if their homosexual lifestyle persisted over many years, to deny it later in life would nullify a good portion of their existence.
Me Too!
In a lot of cases, especially among teenage girls, it's a cry for attention. Considering that most teens in general are looking for new and exciting ways to shock their parents, why not indulge the fantasy they see on TV and in movies?
One of the girls in my Youth Ministry told me that at her school, "Lesibianism is no big deal". Apparently, "all the kids are doing it". While that flippant admission was shocking, it certainly shows how secular culture and the homosexual indoctrination agenda have already impacted today's youth. In most cases, the kids have two working parents, no Faith, and no one to guide them, so they fall prey to whoever will pay them the most attention.
It's a sad truth, but if the future of this nation is worth saving, parents need to raise their kids a heck of a lot better.
I mean no disrespect, but I think that might be an effort to "make up" for following the homosexual lifestyle.
It was an excellent article. I don't know why I was under the impression that he was Catholic because I did take notice of the Jewish teaching but either way, he is right. I have a lot of respect for the Jewish beliefs and for the people. My parents raised us to be respectful and tolerant of all god fearing religions. I don't think any of them are 100% right about everything. I do love the Catholic church though, especially the large, old churches. There is a peace there that I've never found anywhere else.
We figured they were a male and a female when one started mounting the other. (We never bothered to look close).
Imagine our surprise when we started getting TWO eggs per day.
Apparently we had lesbian ducks.
We got eggs from them until that ran out, then my mother refused to cook them as they had become "pets".
I took them over to a friends' house.
They were delicious.
BTW... We're having store bought duck for New Years' dinner.
Response: A symptom of the problem! Debate! Discussion! Different points of view! Tolerance(The inability to say yes or no. The inability to take a stance). Equality and Equal Rights for all(irrespective of merit). Everybody has value!(Absolute nonsense!)
I was born a homophobe. Why would God have made me that way if there was something wrong with it? I'm here, I hate queers. Get used to it.
Wow, you are a couragious women and I doff my battered old stetson. Since I grew up on an island off the west coast, those with a gay persuasion were quickly identified and thereby became known throughout the community. It was not a good idea to cruise the offspring of loggers fishermen and cowboys. Coming out of the closet was a dangerious concept and all things were in balance. Even today I have no problems and socialize with my gay brother-in-law, his significant other and thier friends. They mind thier business, share many of my conservative views and also dislike the political activists within their own community who are constantly trying to expand thier visibility.
No he has always been someone to count on since we were kids. I don't know why some people are gay but I do know that some of the the outrageous comments made about gays are not true. They are a pretty diverse bunch.
bump
Take a waddle on the wild side?
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.