Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/27/2004 7:22:31 PM PST by ddtorque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: ddtorque

OK, just as long as it doesn't self-replicate.


2 posted on 12/27/2004 7:26:36 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

With all the idiotic, useless accessories and "luxuries" they've been putting in cars the last few decades--why the heck doesn't someone invent a car with oil that easy and not messy for the average car owner to change himself?


3 posted on 12/27/2004 7:28:34 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

Cool. Maybe those kids at Jiffy Lube can quit trying to sell me "PVC filters" and find something useful to do with their time.


4 posted on 12/27/2004 7:28:35 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

I doubt it will end the need for an oil change. Oil does break down, but it also accumulates debris - thus a filter.

But, then again, it must be said that every new automotive invention creates a buzz about impact on the future service requirements of vehicles. A great portion of a new car dealer's bottom line comes from the service and repair profit center. They won't be jumping to minimize the opportunity to get the car on the lift - so to speak.

Don't hold onto your hat.

Hence, comes the 21st century tune-up, the flash and flush. Flash - being updating of the onboard brain (have the dealer check your new car's trouble request fixes) and the flush being the flushing of vital fluids - transmission, power steering, brake, and engine fluids.


5 posted on 12/27/2004 7:29:33 PM PST by commonguymd (the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

Oil also takes away engine by products and grime, in short it cleans it. You will still have to change the oil.


7 posted on 12/27/2004 7:30:41 PM PST by Nateman (The enemies of reason are allies of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

Now they can start a whole new chain of "NanoLube"
shops, with Robin Williams as their pitch man...

8 posted on 12/27/2004 7:30:47 PM PST by mikrofon (Nano, nano)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

Is this product also applicable to women?


10 posted on 12/27/2004 7:31:33 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
Now there's an idea. Let's put nano-sized inorganic spheres into every car engine in the world, so that the exhaust pipes of every car engine in the world spew these micro-spheres out into the air we breathe.

Yeah, there's an idea.

11 posted on 12/27/2004 7:31:56 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

There's something on the market here in the NY Metro are called "Motor Silk." Supposedly, it's a one-time oil additive that increases gas mileage.

Has anyone else heard of this?

I didn't fall for Slick-50, or any of the chlorinated or teflon oil additives. I change my oil and filter every 3,000 miles, and have done so for as long as I've owned automobiles.

Every one of them has lasted 100,000+ miles, and many of them have gone over 200,000.

Thanks in advance for any replies.


15 posted on 12/27/2004 7:37:45 PM PST by Pete'sWife (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

Why not just use my ex wife's meat loaf?

How greasy was it?

It was so greasy,......that,.....


18 posted on 12/27/2004 7:39:00 PM PST by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
They should invent nano gasoline so that I wouldn't have to fill up.
19 posted on 12/27/2004 7:39:29 PM PST by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

You'd still have to change the oil. The loss of viscosity isn't the only reason you change your oil. You also change it because byproducts of combustion accumulate in the oil and need to be removed periodically. This new super-syn would do nothing to change that.


23 posted on 12/27/2004 7:41:00 PM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

Are these folks something like the old "snake oil" salesmen? Better watch these slick suckers!


24 posted on 12/27/2004 7:41:57 PM PST by RAY (They that do right are all heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque

I love the word "lubricant."


26 posted on 12/27/2004 7:44:05 PM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
Quaker State just hired a team of assassins to go blow this lab up and kill the scientist and burn the building to the ground after shredding all the formulas and notes no doubt !!
27 posted on 12/27/2004 7:44:11 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
The engine won't even have a dipstick to check the oil.

It may not need a dipstick, but if it is a GM car, it will need a fill tube to add a quart every month or so.

30 posted on 12/27/2004 7:45:46 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
here's an article from tech magazine Red Herring on this subject: Nanotech startup’s slippery slope:

"ApNano’s promising lubricant could give it a key foothold in the burgeoning market. But it’s got major roadblocks – namely, ChevronTexaco, ExxonMobil, and Shell."
34 posted on 12/27/2004 7:51:01 PM PST by ddtorque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
My next car:

(I've had it with all this new fangled crap)

40 posted on 12/27/2004 8:02:29 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
Excellent SF with nannites:


43 posted on 12/27/2004 8:13:16 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ddtorque
Jiffy Lube Headquarters

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

DOOMED!

47 posted on 12/27/2004 8:34:34 PM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson