Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Jackson has 220 kids over for a Party
MSNBC ^

Posted on 12/19/2004 3:42:09 PM PST by MizzouTigerRepublican

LOS OLIVOS, Calif., Dec. 17 — Christmas came early for some 200 children who got to play at Michael Jackson's amusement park and meet Santa Claus. ''I hope you have a wonderful day. Merry Christmas. I love you,'' the pop singer called out to the children Friday from the driveway of his estate. Jackson, who faces trial next year on child molestation charges, appeared happy during the few minutes he spoke to the arriving throng.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: badparenting; freak; freakazoid; howstupidcanmombe; onemorekidandyouget; parentswantlawsuit; saidtomichaeljackson; whatcatholicchurch; yourownparish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: corbe

i ABSOLUTELY agree that OJ was guilty, but my opinion on that is based on the evidence presented.


hah, it still boggles my mind how the juice made it.


21 posted on 12/19/2004 3:59:13 PM PST by cdbull23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"Excuse me, have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight? HeeeEEE HEEeee! Owwwww!" *moonwalk*

}:-)4


22 posted on 12/19/2004 4:01:41 PM PST by Moose4 ("Frrrrrrrrrp." --Livingston the Viking Kitty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizzouTigerRepublican

that reminds me of the joke regarding the Michael Jackson sale at K-Mart....all boys' pants half-off (ugh).


23 posted on 12/19/2004 4:02:42 PM PST by Troublemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
How stupid can their parents be?

Stupid or greedy?

24 posted on 12/19/2004 4:03:45 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Happy December 19th, Impeachment Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: WestVirginiaRebel

The press calls it a party; Jacko calls it a buffett.


he likes the coctail weenies


27 posted on 12/19/2004 4:06:19 PM PST by al baby (she stuned my little beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MizzouTigerRepublican

28 posted on 12/19/2004 4:06:47 PM PST by Alouette (9 kids, 0 abortions, no kidding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23
You would bet your child's virtue on his guilt or innocence?
29 posted on 12/19/2004 4:07:05 PM PST by Drango (Those who advocate robbing (taxing) Peter to pay Paul...will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23
so if someone can prove to me why he's so GUILTY as people around here have already made him out to be, then i'll happily take back my comments.

REASONABLE doubt means just that. There is none in this case. Let's see, this adult man is accused by many young male children, he admits they sleep in his bedroom, and on and on and on. He is guilty as sin, and I mean that literally. If he were some Joe Schmoe, he'd already be in prison.

30 posted on 12/19/2004 4:07:24 PM PST by LisaMalia (Merry CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23

I gave up on the 'Ghost of Christmases Past' when he forked over $25 million to shut that boy up.

Look, the 'Thrilla' admits to sleeping with these kids. What 45 year old men do you wish to allow to sleep with your little boys or girls?

Parents who continue to expose their children to this clown are unfit.


31 posted on 12/19/2004 4:07:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Now THAT is FUNNY! Ha ha ha ha...


32 posted on 12/19/2004 4:08:36 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia

...and singing soprano'er'...

...if you catch my drift.


33 posted on 12/19/2004 4:10:03 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: dubyaismypresident

Ouch. I give. Ahh, what's one more....Did you hear Jackson has food poisoning...yeah, he ate a 10-year old wiener.


35 posted on 12/19/2004 4:11:06 PM PST by Troublemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: al baby

What do you call it when Michael Jackson molests a boy from the inner city?

White on black crime.


36 posted on 12/19/2004 4:11:53 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel ("Nature abhors a moron."-H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

New keyboard requisition coming your way.


37 posted on 12/19/2004 4:13:04 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23
i think people should save their judgements until after the trial...you know, the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing...

You do understand that "innocent until proven guilty" applies to jurors, NOT public opinion, yours or mine. That is nothing more than a cop-out, intended to make you unable to form your own opinions, or judgements. You know, you DO have the right and responsibility to make judgements every day, in all situations. Please do not give me that "innocent until proven guilty" clap-trap again.

38 posted on 12/19/2004 4:15:37 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23

The point is this: No responsible parent would allow their child to be around a man suspected of sexual abuse of children. I wouldn't let my children within 100 feet of this sick bastard. I don't gamble with my children's well being or safety. Those that do in order to allow their children to spend time with a celebrity should have their kids removed. Period!!!!!!!!!


39 posted on 12/19/2004 4:16:03 PM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia

very true, you make a good point.

still (just to continue playing devil's advocate), i could also argue that hundreds, if not thousands, of children would argue otherwise - that he never abused them or took advantage of them...in fact, he did just the opposite, donating to charity, volunteering his time, and on and on and on...and again, we've seen no evidence yet.

personally, i think jackson DOES have mental issues...deprived of a childhood, probably still thinks having kids over = innocent slumber parties.


haha, or not - i admit, i can easily have a change of opinion based on the evidence.


as for the joe schmoe remark, i'll actually agree with you 100% on that one.


40 posted on 12/19/2004 4:23:05 PM PST by cdbull23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson