Posted on 12/18/2004 1:34:07 AM PST by huac
"Officials Ignore DoD Rules, Congressional Notification Law"... "The United States Army plans to force female soldiers into land combat units, despite current regulations and a law requiring prior notice to Congress. CMR has learned that some Army leaders believe there might not be enough male soldiers to fill the new unit of action combat brigades. They are therefore making incremental changes in policy that will soon force young unprepared womenmany of them mothersto fight in land combat."
(Excerpt) Read more at cmrlink.org ...
If a woman was as trained in the killing art of war as a man, then there should be no problem. Don't underestimate a woman, to do so, would be to do so at your peril.
We keep coming back again and again to what I said, "IF" she can preform her physical side of the training, then she should not be denied. Just as a man who could not, he as well should be denied.
Do you personally know that all women cannot carry the load that is required of them, or is it just a generalization of all women?
I would rather have a strong woman covering my back who WANTS to be there than a man who does not.
How much pressure does it take to pull a pin from a grenade? OR, snipe a man in another building? If her stamina, strength and abilities are top rate, then so should be her contribution to the war.
Women have no such yardstick with which to be compared. They must make their bones first, and that won't happen till they are actually on the front line. Just as the blacks proved themselves...women will be proved as well.
"If a combat unit of 100% of some population sub-group is as effective as the current all-male combat units, then integrating those new sub-groups makes sense".
There, you've said it for me. We will not know how women on the front lines will work out until it is put into practice....like the black soldiers.
"IMO Women do have a role in the military, but not in ground combat, for lots of reasons."
I have a great deal of respect for anyone who chooses to serve, and more respect for those who did it well.
I do have a problem with your statement
" You seem to not have a problem attacking women who want to serve their country."
I'm calling BS on you here. Go back and read what I've said, and separate it from what you think I said.
Suggest you go back and take a good look at my page...see how much time I've spent in the infantry and why I might be prone to believe what I do. Based on my experience, women, generally speaking, do not belong in ground combat. Yes, there are women who can meet standards, there are women who can meet standards for any endeaver, but in certain jobs, they are the exception rather than the rule.
If you lower standards, to allow any particular group to be included, you have defeated the purpose you created the standards for in the first place.
If the ....watch out, I'm gonna use the F word here...feminazis advance the cause of women in ground combat ,simply because they are women, to the detriment of our ability to "win", well then I have a problem.
I am somewhat chauvinistic, probably most men are to greater or lessor degrees. IMO, most women are feminists to greater or lessor degrees.
Kind of comes with the territory, don't you think, and it's not necessarily a bad thing...it's just a thing.
"Attack your masculinity? I never attack personally,(once i did, i called someone stupid, but that's when i first came on here) but I noticed that when someone has a guilty conscious, they speak right up. Sorta like a smoke screen defense.".
Given the content of our posts, the implication that I am putting up a smoke screen, is a subtle form of attack.
The allusion to a guilty conscience is very subtle, but none the less a statement of how you view my character.
Keep rolling up the paper...I'll go get my safety glasses.
That's funny. In the USAF there are women A-10 pilots and the Navy has a few F/A-18 pilots that are women. Still, they DID enlist in the Army so why do they complain?
If women want to enlist, they should meet the same standards as men. That means either only the strongest women join or no women join, but it is time for the military to stop being politicallt correct.
It's not just you. It's all who think like you. Who think a woman does not belong on the front lines. It isn't personal.
Why single out...'but not for ground combat'. Why should she be denied because some men have a problem with the potential of having women on the front lines.
I don't see a problem here...This will sound nasty to some people but others have brought up the 'hygiene' part of a woman being on the front lines or getting preganent. There is a shot that women can get called, 'Depo provera', that will stop all monthlies and pregnancy is extremely unlikely.
Lower standards? Your kidding right? By having women in the front lines that is lowering the military? How can you say that, it hasn't been tried yet.
Detriment? Let me process that for a second....finished. How could it possibly be a detriment for a skilled combat soldier to do their job with bravery, dignity and honor? Be it man or woman.
I'm a housewife, I know what my duties are. My hubby is the bread winner he knows what his duties are.
Not all men are, dare I say it? yep. I will. Chauvinazis. Being a little chauvinist, and a little feminist isn't a bad thing altogether. It's when the lines are crossed and one sex forbids another sex from try to reach their ultimate possibilities. I firmly believe that women who prove themselves should be given the opportunity to do so.
If I was being subtle, let me assure you I didn't know I was doing it. That's not my style. But it's nice to hear that I am capable of being subtle.
I'm sorry if I offended you with my "SUBILITIES". It was not meant to offend, only to inspire debate....
Those goggles look silly on your head like that. Take them off. I'll throw my rolled up paper in the trash.
And as far as throwing.....you apparently never played base ball.
From Women in the IDF :
Female conscripts served in the Women's Army Corps, commonly known by its Hebrew acronym, Chen. After a five-week period of basic training, women served as clerks, drivers, welfare workers, nurses, radio operators, flight controllers, ordnance personnel, and course instructors. Women had not engaged in direct combat since the War of Independence.They get the training, but are not posted to front-line combat
We are volunteer.
Women have more at stake to lose than men when it comes to Islam. Women have more to fight for.
Affirmative action....give me a break.
To fight for the survival of ones country...it doesn't matter one way or the other who does the fighting as long as the battle is won.
Women who fight their country should not even enter into the equations when it comes to fighting a war.
Affirmative action....please. Surly you can do better than that.
You read this Joe, then get back to me when you are a woman, and see what we have to fight against. All women.
Until then, figure out who the chauvinazis are.
You people screw up our economy enough with your worthless feminist "affirmative action" nonsense. We don't need you pushing that leftist garbage on our nation's defense forces.
Leftist scum don't care what women want either, they order them into the combat zone for no reason, just to suage their own pathetic delusions about sexual "equality." They don't care that it hurts our ability to fight and promotes the incompetent, they like it in fact, because they will do anything to weaken our military readiness and make Americans want to keep us out of war. Leftist vermin want women on the front lines for the same reason that Charlie Rangel wants to bring back the draft, so that American's will be against the war.
What you said. 100%. Some things women are better at, such as being mothers. Some things men are better at, such as being warriors. That's just the way mother nature arranged it.
Yes we do. And many have been shot with their own services weapons by bad guys that simply overpowered them.
If you were on patrol in the senseless murder district, who would you want for a partner, a 6'2 220 pound man, or a 5'9" 150 female?
I think the answer is painfully obvious.
In Israel, for example, it is my understanding that women are on the front lines in every branch of the military. Swat, Special Forces, Hostage Teams, etc.
What front lines?
If they are all so bad a$$ed in Israel, why aren't they on the real front lines in Iraq, helping our guys, that could use the help?
You go ahead and protect the women that need protecting. I will protect myself.
What ever you are smoking you should really put it down. It is interfering with your thought process.
The last thing on the planet the islamist want are freedom speaking strong women. It's the kind you want to protect that will fit right into their standards. It is me and women like me who will be silenced. You need to calm down and think rationally.
Leftist...wow, what a hoot.
When men and women join the military, they don't get to make decisions for themselves any more.
Military capability is more important than your feminist pretensions or your childish fantasies of G.I.Jane dominating the jihadist enemy. The reality is far different: the brutal rape, mutilation and murder of our female soldiers has already occurred unnecessarily because of the ridiculous delusions of people like you who put the "battle of the sexes" before the battle for the nation.
Save your inflated ego for someone who cares.
I'm done with you...Be gone
It's "macho, chest-beating, knuckle-dragging men" who defend this nation and protect your right express your stupid opinions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.