Skip to comments.
Seattle Times Stumping for Votes in Gov.'s Race (for the Democrat of course)
Seattle Times ^
| 12/15/2004
| calreaganfan
Posted on 12/15/2004 12:26:28 PM PST by calreaganfan
Today, the Seattle Times has gone to the extraordinary length of publishing a list of the names and addresses of 1,555 voters (only in King County of course) whose absentee ballots were rejected due to signature problems. The newspaper is making an all-out effort to scrounge up every last vote for the Democrat candidate for governor.
TOPICS: US: Washington; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dinorossi; washingtonelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
The WA counties are supposed to be just manually retabulating votes that have already been counted. Only in King County are the election officials (all Dems) going back to see if they can find more votes for Gregoire. The Seattle Times is a willing accomplice. The 561 ballots "discovered" on Monday is now up to 573 ballots. It's amazing how when Rossi picks up votes in the rest of the state, King County keeps coming up with more "lost" ballots.
To: calreaganfan
It's amazing how when Rossi picks up votes in the rest of the state, King County keeps coming up with more "lost" ballots.
=====
The communists have manufactured votes SIX TIMES since Rossi won the election.
2
posted on
12/15/2004 12:29:56 PM PST
by
sarah_f
(Know Islam, Know Terror.)
To: calreaganfan
This race is not looking good for Rossi. Gregoire will likely pick up at least 120 votes from the 573 newly "found" ballots plus there's still the manual recount of all 900,000 King County ballots. Currently, Rossi has just a 106 vote lead. That's not nearly enough to withstand the coming onslaught from the Dem vote counters in King County.
To: calreaganfan
SO NEW RULES!! If The DUMMIES don't win we make new rules and recount the votes until they do win. This has gone to far!!!
4
posted on
12/15/2004 12:31:45 PM PST
by
26lemoncharlie
(Defending America)
To: calreaganfan
They will "find" as many as necessary.
5
posted on
12/15/2004 12:31:51 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: calreaganfan
They cant even CHEAT and Win, Who wants people so DUMB that they can't Cheat and WIN!! If this was not so serious it would be funny, but it's not funny anymore, they are pathetic!!
6
posted on
12/15/2004 12:33:36 PM PST
by
26lemoncharlie
(Defending America)
To: calreaganfan
Has Jesse Jackson been to Washington during this "recount"?
To: calreaganfan
I almost think publishing those names would be a privacy issue.
8
posted on
12/15/2004 12:34:59 PM PST
by
Vicki
(Truth and Reality)
To: calreaganfan
Sounds like Gregoire's whole administration will be marred by this. She will be dogged with charges of being illegitimate. Much like President Bush in the first term. Only in Gregoire's case, it will be true!
9
posted on
12/15/2004 12:38:17 PM PST
by
TNCMAXQ
To: calreaganfan
It's time to take the gloves off and go for CRATS. Those sick rats are the scourge of the Country.
10
posted on
12/15/2004 12:38:57 PM PST
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: Vicki
"I almost think publishing those names would be a privacy issue."
Exactly my thought. They not only published the names but also the home addresses--in the newspaper and on their website!! Who cares about privacy when the Dems (& their media co-conspirators) are trying to steal an election.
To: calreaganfan
"It's amazing how when Rossi picks up votes in the rest of the state, King County keeps coming up with more "lost" ballots."Amazing? No. Absurd yes. But remember John Kerry actually won the election. . .
12
posted on
12/15/2004 12:43:54 PM PST
by
Tempest
(Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
To: calreaganfan
Perhaps someone will sue them, as their voting, or not voting, is an expressly private matter. Publicizing those who chose not to sign or were to stupid to sign is quite possibly a sue-able offense.
13
posted on
12/15/2004 12:46:27 PM PST
by
blanknoone
(The two big battles left in the War on Terror are against our State dept and our media.)
To: calreaganfan
Perhaps someone will sue them, as their voting, or not voting, is an expressly private matter. Publicizing those who chose not to sign or were to stupid to sign is quite possibly a sue-able offense.
14
posted on
12/15/2004 12:46:29 PM PST
by
blanknoone
(The two big battles left in the War on Terror are against our State dept and our media.)
To: calreaganfan
King County is nothing short of liberal leftist communists. When is Mt St. Helens going to blow and take King County with it? I'm praying for that day.
15
posted on
12/15/2004 12:48:08 PM PST
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: CyberCowboy777
16
posted on
12/15/2004 12:51:08 PM PST
by
The SISU kid
(I'm the swizzle stick in the cocktail of life)
To: blanknoone; calreaganfan
Since they published the precincts for each of these persons; is it a possibility to compare the before and after counts for these precincts to find out exactly who these people voted for.
17
posted on
12/15/2004 1:00:33 PM PST
by
WASH
To: WASH
Yes, it it.
Interesting: Thomas E. Kehl-Fie appears twice. Hmmm...
18
posted on
12/15/2004 1:26:25 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(† trad-anglican.faithweb.com † || Iran Azadi || All I want for Christmas is a legitimate governor.)
To: calreaganfan
If I recall correctly, one of the interesting side notes on those ballots was that the DNC called each of the voters for the problem ballots, asked if the person was a Democrat, and if they answered no, hung up on them. If it was yes, they informed them of the problem and offered to drive out and get a new signature.
The Seattle Times might have shot themselves in the foot with this stunt.
19
posted on
12/15/2004 1:28:50 PM PST
by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: lilylangtree
When is Mt St. Helens going to blow and take King County with it? Mt. Rainer would do the job just fine; it's a lot closer.
20
posted on
12/15/2004 1:29:22 PM PST
by
CedarDave
(Primary rule of Dem whining: The complaint need not be accurate as long as the charge is serious.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson