Skip to comments.
CLINTON'S RICH LEGACY
New York Post ^
| 12/14/04
Posted on 12/13/2004 11:12:36 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
12/13/2004 11:12:36 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Fortunately, the White House currently is occupied by a president who can be trusted not to sell off his pardon power. Yeah, he'll just give "it's not an amnesty, amnesty" away for free.
2
posted on
12/13/2004 11:15:03 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: kattracks
Most (anti-freedom) criminals never stop until they are incarcerated or killed.
Mark Rich and William Jefferson Criminal are no exceptions.
3
posted on
12/13/2004 11:18:39 PM PST
by
PGalt
To: kattracks
CLINTON'S RICH LEGACY
4
posted on
12/13/2004 11:19:09 PM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: kattracks
It brings up once again my favorite statement about the two most dangerous and evil politicians in American history (who by the way are not even close to done inflicting damage on America yet)...that statment is this:
G*dd*m Bill and Hillary Clinton to hell!
To: DoughtyOne
Yeah, he'll just give "it's not an amnesty, amnesty" away for free. Begone troll, go over to DU you will be received better...
To: Husker8877
There is NO doubt about that. And the sooner the better.
7
posted on
12/13/2004 11:35:07 PM PST
by
upchuck
(This tag line shutdown for it's "30,000 messages posted" check up.)
To: DoughtyOne
Why ruin a perfectly good Clinton-Bash thread.
8
posted on
12/13/2004 11:38:10 PM PST
by
Brimack34
To: Echo Talon
I hate to break it to you, but D.U. thinks A.N.S.W.E.R. is the tops. A.N.S.W.E.R. is aligned with the leading illegal immigrant advocates in our nation. Now, isn't it charming that our president wants to provide an "it's not an amnesty, amnesty", which essentially works out to be a pardon for illegal immigrants? Think about it. Learn about it. Fight it.
9
posted on
12/13/2004 11:39:23 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: Brimack34
Well, sorry, but when our side starts to offer something that looks an awful lot like a pardon for illegal activity, it bothers me.
Now, back to bashing Clinton. It's a worthy cause.
10
posted on
12/13/2004 11:40:47 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: kattracks
11
posted on
12/13/2004 11:43:24 PM PST
by
isom35
To: kattracks; All
12
posted on
12/14/2004 12:04:58 AM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the Trackball into the Dawn of Information...)
To: backhoe
13
posted on
12/14/2004 12:46:56 AM PST
by
malia
(do a FR search on "Fallujah battle inflicted crippling defeat on terrorists")
To: kattracks
14
posted on
12/14/2004 3:47:48 AM PST
by
GailA
(JESUS is the reason for the season)
To: kattracks
The interesting thing is that the CIA knew during Clinton's term that Rich was involved in violating the sanctions with Saddam, yet he chose to pardon him. If the CIA knew, Clinton had to have known.
15
posted on
12/14/2004 4:29:22 AM PST
by
mass55th
("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
To: kattracks
Since Denise Rich gave $500,000 to the Clinton Library and $1.7 million to Democrats, it is easy to see why the MSM is reluctant to cover the UN's Oil-For-Food scandal.
Meanwhile, the Clinton legacy has begun to morph from "It's all about sex" into "It's all about oil" -- with a few hundred thousand Iraqi kids dying for lack of food and medicine. Recall, this was a prime reason for attacking US policy to support sanctions against Saddam.
Note: Before the Clinton-oil scandal broke, some estimates were as high as 5 million children dead.
16
posted on
12/14/2004 5:19:52 AM PST
by
OESY
To: kattracks; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog
Hitting the fan - again - bump...
17
posted on
12/14/2004 5:40:20 AM PST
by
Libloather
(Big Media news anchors are as worthless as male nipples...)
To: kattracks
Again, Rich's role in the Oil-for-Food scandal began only after he was pardoned by Bill Clinton. Oh, I wouldn't be so quick to state it like that, NY Post. Before Rich's name explicitly came out, we had discerned some associates of his on "the list". I suspect he was involved before but in a hidden way. I (and I'm sure most freepers) suspect the Clintons were in on a "cut" of the take, too.
To: OESY
Meanwhile, the Clinton legacy has begun to morph from "It's all about sex" into "It's all about oil" -- with a few hundred thousand Iraqi kids dying for lack of food and medicine. Yes, indeed. Early on in this scandal I noted that the left's cry of "No War for Oil!" gets a very ugly meaning with these revelations. No war to take away their oil and innocent Iraqis be damned, is what they really meant.
To: cyncooper
One would be incredibly naive to think the Clinton's missed out on the largest money laundering scheme in world history.
20
posted on
12/14/2004 5:49:30 AM PST
by
Quilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson