1 posted on
12/13/2004 11:12:36 PM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Fortunately, the White House currently is occupied by a president who can be trusted not to sell off his pardon power. Yeah, he'll just give "it's not an amnesty, amnesty" away for free.
2 posted on
12/13/2004 11:15:03 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: kattracks
Most (anti-freedom) criminals never stop until they are incarcerated or killed.
Mark Rich and William Jefferson Criminal are no exceptions.
3 posted on
12/13/2004 11:18:39 PM PST by
PGalt
To: kattracks
CLINTON'S RICH LEGACY
4 posted on
12/13/2004 11:19:09 PM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: kattracks
It brings up once again my favorite statement about the two most dangerous and evil politicians in American history (who by the way are not even close to done inflicting damage on America yet)...that statment is this:
G*dd*m Bill and Hillary Clinton to hell!
To: kattracks
11 posted on
12/13/2004 11:43:24 PM PST by
isom35
To: kattracks; All
12 posted on
12/14/2004 12:04:58 AM PST by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the Trackball into the Dawn of Information...)
To: kattracks
14 posted on
12/14/2004 3:47:48 AM PST by
GailA
(JESUS is the reason for the season)
To: kattracks
The interesting thing is that the CIA knew during Clinton's term that Rich was involved in violating the sanctions with Saddam, yet he chose to pardon him. If the CIA knew, Clinton had to have known.
15 posted on
12/14/2004 4:29:22 AM PST by
mass55th
("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
To: kattracks
Since Denise Rich gave $500,000 to the Clinton Library and $1.7 million to Democrats, it is easy to see why the MSM is reluctant to cover the UN's Oil-For-Food scandal.
Meanwhile, the Clinton legacy has begun to morph from "It's all about sex" into "It's all about oil" -- with a few hundred thousand Iraqi kids dying for lack of food and medicine. Recall, this was a prime reason for attacking US policy to support sanctions against Saddam.
Note: Before the Clinton-oil scandal broke, some estimates were as high as 5 million children dead.
16 posted on
12/14/2004 5:19:52 AM PST by
OESY
To: kattracks; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog
Hitting the fan - again - bump...
17 posted on
12/14/2004 5:40:20 AM PST by
Libloather
(Big Media news anchors are as worthless as male nipples...)
To: kattracks
Again, Rich's role in the Oil-for-Food scandal began only after he was pardoned by Bill Clinton. Oh, I wouldn't be so quick to state it like that, NY Post. Before Rich's name explicitly came out, we had discerned some associates of his on "the list". I suspect he was involved before but in a hidden way. I (and I'm sure most freepers) suspect the Clintons were in on a "cut" of the take, too.
To: kattracks
Democrat Rules 101:
1) We are the brightest, most knowledgeable people in the whole world.
2) We know what's best for everyone
3) When something good happens to America, see numbers 1 & 2 above so we can take credit
4) When something bad happens to America, see Newt Gingrich, Tom DeLay or George Bush.
5) When we get caught in something illegal, we can't remember a damn thing.
Concerning this scandal, Hillary will return the money and/or apologize the day she wears a knee-length skirt. It ain't going to happen.
22 posted on
12/14/2004 6:10:06 PM PST by
GianniV
To: kattracks
25 posted on
12/14/2004 6:26:20 PM PST by
petercooper
(DEAN in '08!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
