Posted on 12/12/2004 4:25:58 PM PST by jb6
or will it be the year we realise it's not really an issue after all?
E-mail to a friend
Printer friendly
Reader Comments
Post your comment here
How big a deal is offshoring? Depends who you ask.
Research firm Gartner published a study Monday saying it "isn't as widespread as people think", with lower-cost locales accounting for less than three per cent of money spent on global information technology services this year.
Gartner projects that figure to grow but remain a relatively small fraction of total spending. By 2008, spending on IT services delivered through "global sourcing" will reach about seven per cent of a $728bn total market - or roughly $50bn.
A more bullish view came Thursday from NeoIT, a consulting firm that advises clients about offshore projects. NeoIT "foresees a big year for offshore outsourcing growth in 2005" and predicts that more than "80 per cent of the Global 2,000 will have an offshore presence by the end of the year."
Although the studies do not necessarily contradict one another, their differing tones reflect a broader set of conflicting opinions about the hot-button topic. Comprehensive information about the scale and impact of offshoring has been lacking, but the United States' Congress recently passed a bill that would set aside $2m to study the issue.
Defenders of sending high-skilled work to countries such as India and the Philippines say it ultimately benefits economies of countries sending jobs overseas, as well as the workers in those countries. Critics claim that the practice eliminates well-paying jobs and threatens the countries long-term technological leadership.
Although wages can be much lower outside the United States and Western Europe, the overall effectiveness of shipping work abroad has come under scrutiny.
"Over 40 per cent of offshore initiatives will not yield anticipated savings, scale or risk diversification," NeoIT said in its predictions for 2005. "The key reason for these disappointments will not be due to supplier capability but buyer preparation and management."
Despite predicting a large proportion of deal duds, NeoIT said it "sees increasing acceptance for offshoring as a foregone conclusion for multinational corporations that must keep pace with global competition, global supply and global delivery models."
Although much attention has been put on the way offshore projects can eliminate jobs in domestic markets, Gartner's report indicated that tech professionals should be more concerned with the growing automation of computer systems. "Utility computing will have [a] greater job impact than offshore outsourcing," the report said.
I'm waiting for them to start outsourcing IT jobs that require a security clearance. Crazy as it might sound, I have heard some Government Contractors make a case for it.
It's illegal to outsource government related work, thank God. I don't even want to think of the consequences otherwise.
The argument I heard (from a VP at a fairly big defense contractor) is that you could go to countries that were staunchly pro-US (like Taiwan & South Korea) and rely on the local intelligence services to get an "equivalent" clearance. His contention was that the amount of investigation performed for SECRET clearances was fairly rudimentry and unreliable. Many foreign governments are not shackled by the privacy restrictions we have and can actually produce more detailed background profiles on applicants. Plus, the salary of those hired, though lower than that of Americans, would be much higher than what they would otherwise make--this would help instill loyalty.
IMHO--these were dubious assertions at best. So why might this country take the chance? His thinking was that it would come to pass to free up acquisition funds for weapons systems (like the JSF) that we can't quite afford to procure.
I don't know how much they actually do when they process it, but having filled out Secret clearances before, God is it a lot of paper work. Took two weeks to come up with all the paper work. Of course they are over a year behind schedule. Either way, no, Taiwan? God, can you guarentee me that there are no Communist (facist) Chinese there doing the "checking"?
2005: Year of the weak dollar
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1299932/posts
Real title.
5 years on and it isn’t so big...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.