Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zogby Polling Seeks Damage Control After Election Day Flub
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 12/09/04 | Marc Morano

Posted on 12/09/2004 2:21:14 AM PST by kattracks

Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - Following an Election Day prediction that Democratic candidate John Kerry would win more than 300 electoral votes and the presidency, one of America's most well known polling firms continued the job Wednesday of explaining its flawed projection.

Shawnta Watson Walcott, communications director for Zogby International, joined a group of liberal Democrats at a faux congressional hearing focused on whether fraud influenced the Nov. 2 outcome.

"... it has become increasingly clear that this election has produced unprecedented levels of suspicion regarding its outcome, and we join this panel discussion in an attempt to find a resolution to these issues," said Walcott, who represented the firm's president and long time political pollster John Zogby at the forum sponsored by Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee.

On Election Day, Zogby predicted that Kerry would win 311 electoral votes. For much of that afternoon, he also rated the state of Virginia as too close to call. Not only did President Bush end up winning Virginia by 9 percentage points over Kerry, he won 286 electoral votes, over 3.3 million popular vote more than Kerry and, of course, re-election.

But with a Rayburn House Office Building meeting room as the backdrop, Judiciary Committee Democrats, liberal special interest groups and individuals like Rainbow PUSH Coalition founder Jesse Jackson Wednesday alleged that the election had been marred by fraud and malfunctioning voting machines.

Walcott told the group assembled that Zogby International had questions of its own pertaining to the election.

"We have received thousands of letters and phone calls regarding irregularities - many of which center on early exit polling results that were uncharacteristically inaccurate in several battleground states; questionable practices at polling stations that may have resulted in votes not being counted accurately; and in Ohio, as with other swing states, the automated Diebolt machines were particularly disturbing because they offered no voting receipts" she said.

"It is with this intention that we recommend that a blue ribbon bipartisan panel be developed to investigate the allegations discussed here today ..." Walcott added.

Later, another noted political observer questioned the wisdom of Walcott attending the partisan event at the Rayburn Office Building.

Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, said Zogby polling may have crossed a line in its call for an investigation of the election results.

"It's highly unusual for a pollster who claims not to be partisan to issue such a call [for an investigation]," Sabato told CNSNews.com .

When asked whether he thought Zogby might be trying to spread the idea of voter fraud to explain his mistaken pre-election prediction, Sabato responded, "I can't comment on [Zogby's] motives. I have no idea. But I can tell you this. This whole [election fraud] hullabaloo is malarky."

In explaining her presence at Wednesday's meeting, Walcott said she was offering "recommendations that may help restore the dignity and public confidence in the democratic process -- a process that is clearly worth protecting."

But Sabato said such criticism of the election process were without merit.

"There is absolutely no chance that the election was stolen, and there is absolutely no chance that the election results will be reversed in Ohio -- regardless of how many investigations are done," Sabato added.

Democrats have centered most of their allegations of election mismanagement or wrongdoing on Ohio, even though President Bush beat Kerry in the state by more than 135,000 votes.

Sabato also ridiculed the assertion by Zogby International that its exit polls were "uncharacteristically inaccurate" in 2004. "They have been characteristically inaccurate in 2000, 2002, 2004 -- wrong three times in a row and highly inaccurate," Sabato said.

"So talking about cynicism, the cynicism is being generated by these wild claims. Was it a perfect election? No. Has there ever been a perfect election in the history of the world? No," Sabato concluded.

See Related Article:
Jesse Jackson: 2004 Election 'Ain't Over' (Dec. 8, 2004)

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bullzogby; dirtytricks; fraud; howtostealanelection; kerrydefeat; mediawingofthednc; napalminthemorning; partyofthehindparts; poll; polls; predictions; propaganda; rathergate; rattricks; sabato; scrogby; wot; zogby; zogbyism; zogbysauce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last
To: muir_redwoods
"Zogby, an Arab-American, had an axe to grind against Bush and skewed the polls to try to advantage Kerry."

You are so right!

I was a Zogby respondent for the full year before the election. Every time I was asked to answer, I could see errors of logic in the questions and inherent biases in the multiple choices offered. As a mathematician I am familiar with statistical bias. Sad to say Zogby's bias was obvious in the questions.

21 posted on 12/09/2004 2:49:16 AM PST by NetValue (Trust the cobra before you trust the liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: itsinthebag; sionnsar; PARodrig; SirLurkedalot
Prospective Democratic voter:

STOP CONFUSING ME!! Republicans keep making fun of stupid people. That's why we never vote for you guys! By the way, have any of you seen my hat???

(Scratches head in confusion. Wanders off thread.)

22 posted on 12/09/2004 2:50:12 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

L.O.L....Your right...Democrats are stupid people.


23 posted on 12/09/2004 2:56:27 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In explaining her presence at Wednesday's meeting, Walcott said she was offering "recommendations that may help restore the dignity and public confidence in the democratic process -- a process that is clearly worth protecting."

My reccommendation? Count the optically scanned ballots one time and then don't bitch and whine about the results.

24 posted on 12/09/2004 3:03:47 AM PST by listenhillary (My tagline died, memorials may be made to me via Paypal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Then why was almost every other pollster spot-on within a point or two?

Even Zogpiss showed Bush winning the popular vote.


25 posted on 12/09/2004 3:04:09 AM PST by Nataku X (For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

LMAO!


26 posted on 12/09/2004 3:06:32 AM PST by SirLurkedalot (Merry Christmas and Happy Hannukah!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

I am so happy that the myth of Zogby's competance has finally put away. I remember arguing with untold numbers of freepers who swore by him before this election based on Zog's own fallacious stats from the 2000 race. The mantra-like claim Zogbyphiles repeated over and over again, "Zogby was dead on in 2000" shall, thank God, never be taken seriously again.


27 posted on 12/09/2004 3:18:03 AM PST by MMkennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr; Dales; RWR8189; ambrose; LS; counterpunch; skaterboy; Iowa Granny; Illinois Rep; kesg; ...

ping


28 posted on 12/09/2004 3:21:12 AM PST by Cableguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I'd be perfectly willing to see an investigation into fraud - that is, the fraud of the exit polling. This election was certainly much cleaner than, say, the 1960 election.


29 posted on 12/09/2004 3:22:56 AM PST by thoughtomator (Nobody expects the secular inquisition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

Interesting stuff. The whinning may never stop.


30 posted on 12/09/2004 3:25:05 AM PST by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: itsinthebag
And indeed people came out to vote two days later

I have never heard of a single documented case of such nonsense. You'd have to be from another planet not to know the correct election day.

If someone sent out such notices, where is a hard copy example? It would also have a postmark and probably a return address.

31 posted on 12/09/2004 3:27:35 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Nationally Tarrance and Pew were better than Rasmussen, but Rasmussen did come in a very respectable third after his embarrassment in 2000.
32 posted on 12/09/2004 3:29:43 AM PST by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cableguy

This is almost as good as Zogby proclaiming his "Interactive" polls a great success and the wave of the future.


33 posted on 12/09/2004 3:32:03 AM PST by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I heard that Pew did pretty well.

I forgot how well Tarrance performed, in this case.

The only reason that I mentioned Rasmussen was because it seemed like his poll was relied upon to a large extent by other freepers during the election.

34 posted on 12/09/2004 3:32:15 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham (Why did it take me so long to come up with a new tag-line, huh?! What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This is the coup de grace for schlockby. No sane objective pollster would have participated in that acid trip of a farce of a whine-festival. Hereafter, his polls and polling methodology will be fit only for his fellow Islamofascists, who need to poll their rabid scum on proper beheading techniques and number of times to lash a woman who peeks out a window without her veil.


35 posted on 12/09/2004 3:35:30 AM PST by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsinthebag

Folks as stupid as the NAACP claims their folks are, are certainly too stupid to vote...

Semper Fi


36 posted on 12/09/2004 3:37:18 AM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

And I have been voting for decades and have never gotten or seen any type of receipt for voting.


37 posted on 12/09/2004 3:38:30 AM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

THE ONLY FRAUD IS ZOGBY!

HE SNEEK PEEKS AT EXIT POLLING DATA, 5PM THE DAY OF THE ELECTION, AND THEN PUTS OUT HIS "FINAL" POLL!

WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!


38 posted on 12/09/2004 3:42:45 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Next election cycle, can we please not post any Zogby polls?


39 posted on 12/09/2004 3:48:10 AM PST by rabidralph (George W. Bush, the other Body Hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

They're just mad because they can't stuff the ballot boxes or punch out chads.


40 posted on 12/09/2004 3:48:13 AM PST by Nataku X (For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson