Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Director of National Intelligence Candidates
The Drudge Report ^ | December 8, 2004 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 12/08/2004 7:15:28 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative

The following is posted on Drudge right now:

Names of people being vetted by the White House for the new position of Director of National Intelligence:

DCI Porter Goss

Gov Tom Kean

General Michael Hayden

John Lehman

Sen. Joe Lieberman

Rep Pete Hoekstra

Rep Jane Harman...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; goss; harman; hayden; hoekstra; inteldirector; intelligence; intelligencereform; kean; lehman; lieberman; national
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Bluegrass Conservative

General Hayden is my #1 choice -- couldn't get a better person IMHO -- he has seen it all, is organized, and has been part the top intelligence organizations in the Air Force and DoD.


21 posted on 12/08/2004 8:05:01 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- GO SOONERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
Lehman appears weak at times. i think he is easily intimidated by the yammering class.

hayden does have an impressive resume. Good possibility.

22 posted on 12/08/2004 8:06:44 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

I say we choose Maxine Waters.


23 posted on 12/08/2004 8:07:23 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
John Lehman --- Never

He was on NPR talking about a new National Police Force.

24 posted on 12/08/2004 8:08:20 AM PST by bmwcyle (I wear sleepwear therefore I think (When they are off I am single minded))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Those are the names Drudge listed. I have no idea what the source is.


25 posted on 12/08/2004 8:08:59 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1

Why does President Bush have to make himself look good by appointing a rabid liberal from California? What is it with all of this talk about reaching out and appointing democrats, etc.? We won the election, didn't we? Have you ever seen Harmon on any of the talk shows? She is democrat through and through and has all the talking points mastered. She hates Bush and would do anything she could to bring him down. Frankly I'm tired of "reaching out". We won and we should choose people who agree with us, not disagree with us.


26 posted on 12/08/2004 8:09:54 AM PST by WatchOutForSnakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'
"At least Jamie Gorelick's name is not on the list."

That is exactly why NO ONE on the 9/11 Commission should be considered. They failed to do what they needed to do in regard to Ms. Gorelick.

27 posted on 12/08/2004 8:14:57 AM PST by maxter (If you believe it, you can achieve it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WatchOutForSnakes

Yes, actually I have seen her on a boatload of shows, and on this particular issue, she has been forthright and fair, couching her partisan criticisms, where they should be, but not demagouging the issue.....


My Main point being, these overfunded 9/11 attention grabbing professional grievers will remain a potnetial political problem, and a move like this makes that go away to a greater or lesser extent, and also shields the administration from criticism (like Ridge got over the last 3 years), and Harman has no higher aspirations, she has already left Congress once.....

I will tell you this.....If Kerry had picked her for a running mate, He'd be getting sworn in, next month.


28 posted on 12/08/2004 8:17:27 AM PST by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Sure as hell not Lieberman. He was wanting to push government monitoring of the internet, etc., to "protect the children".


29 posted on 12/08/2004 8:18:40 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

And you think the government doesn't already monitor the internet?


30 posted on 12/08/2004 8:23:17 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Okay, let me put it another way, Lieberman was wanting to control some of the content available on the internet. Once they start trying to do that to "protect the children", it'll quickly extend to "protecting people from themselves".


31 posted on 12/08/2004 8:46:19 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

bump


32 posted on 12/08/2004 8:48:43 AM PST by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Damn kids. They always get in the way of everybody's fun. LOL I'm just kidding.

I do understand your point. I can't say I'm a fan of "big brother" intruding either. At the same time, I don't want pornography to be easily accessed by children. It's a Catch-22 with no great resolution to the problem.

I may not agree with Senator Lieberman's proposal on that, but I do believe him to be a man on honest intentions and I believe his heart is in the right place. There just should be an alternative answer to the problem.

33 posted on 12/08/2004 8:52:02 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1

Lately, Harman has been talking intelligently. But she can be a real partisan hack. She hasn't convinced me she's ready for something like this. I just don't trust her.


34 posted on 12/08/2004 8:53:26 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

I agree. I could accept Lieberman. At least from what I now know.


35 posted on 12/08/2004 8:58:01 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Wow. Like, a real CONSERVATIVE onslaught.


36 posted on 12/08/2004 8:59:10 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (If the GOP fields a genuine and not a phony in 2008, there's no way Hilary can win USA hearts/votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I like Joe Lieberman. he sold out to Gore in 2000 though. But who wouldnt fo ra chance to be VP right?


37 posted on 12/08/2004 10:43:50 AM PST by NYURepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
I may not agree with Senator Lieberman's proposal on that, but I do believe him to be a man on honest intentions and I believe his heart is in the right place. There just should be an alternative answer to the problem.

The answer is parents who act like parents and not like their kids' best friends. That's for another thread though.
38 posted on 12/08/2004 10:53:53 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

While I think that is an excellent suggestion, it's not always the answer either. Don't tell me you didn't sneak and do some things as a kid that your parents never found out about. : )


39 posted on 12/08/2004 11:05:07 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1

"I like Harman as a choice. "

You've got to be kidding! As someone pointed out, this is a critical position, no time for a token Democrat. Harman would be terrible.

In fact most people on this list are way too dovish.


My take on the potential candidates:

DCI Porter Goss possible, but then Bush will have to get a new CIA director

Gov Tom Kean He the head of the 9-11 commission and let the Dems roll all over him.

General Michael Hayden -- I don't know him, what someone posted about his sounds good, but I would like to know more about his real record of decisions.

John Lehman -- also on the 9-11 commission, also not standing up to the Dems.

Sen. Joe Lieberman -- he may sound like a hawk, as Dems go, but he wouldn't be strong enough.

Rep Pete Hoekstra -- I don't know him

Rep Jane Harman... -- this must be a joke.
====


I would hope Bush comes up with some real high caliber person for this job, it's a critical job.





40 posted on 12/08/2004 2:11:29 PM PST by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson