Skip to comments.
Why Diamonds?
Google/ABC ^
| Feb 14, 2004
| John Stossel
Posted on 12/02/2004 2:40:42 PM PST by swilhelm73
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: swilhelm73
*Important Diamonds* are rare - the kind most of us purchase are not. *Important Diamonds* are those with a provenance to Royalty or scandal; with a hefty price tag to match.
The kind most of us purchase are not a good investment and certainly aren't important. DeBeers has created an entire culture of diamond giving to support their business. My great Aunt's engagement ring was an Alexanderite - and that was only 60 years ago - and Great Uncle was LOADED!
21
posted on
12/02/2004 3:17:21 PM PST
by
WIladyconservative
(Be an active member of the pajamahadeen - set up a monthly donation to FR!!)
To: swilhelm73
Diamonds are as common as pearls. DeBeers hoards them and buys up any finds as soon as the find is announced. About 15-20 years ago, the Soviet Union announced that they had a mine that would produce a goodly quantity of 1/4-1/2 carat gem quality diamonds, the staple of the market. DeBeers got in touch and offered to either buy up all the stock or they would flood the market with similar stones. The Soviets sold out to DeBeers.
I have seen a film of a warehouse with literally millions of carats worth of gems DeBeers is hoarding. Diamonds are an artificially priced commodity that should sell, in a free market, for lots less than rubies, emeralds or sapphires.
To: EagleMamaMT
A diamond is just a fancy rock. A loving husband is a jewel beyond compare. So beautifully said, and so true.
23
posted on
12/02/2004 3:22:48 PM PST
by
bootless
(Never Forget - And Never Again)
To: Chad Fairbanks
That's why I buy them. And if they were dug out of the ground by slave labor they sparkle more.
Actually I prefer amber, garnets, tanzanite and amethyst.
Diamonds just don't do it for me unless they are colored diamonds which are indeed rare and quite out of my price range.
24
posted on
12/02/2004 3:24:43 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The future is all around us, waiting in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation.)
To: swilhelm73
Hmmm.. Shinny rock good.
25
posted on
12/02/2004 3:25:19 PM PST
by
rcocean
To: swilhelm73
I have a very lovely, and very small, diamond that my darling Mr Grammy gave me nearly 34 years ago. I wouldn't trade it for a bigger one for anything. Small diamonds signify first marriages better than anything else.
8-)
He has given me other diamonds over the years now that we can afford them, but not rings. I have never asked him for diamonds, but it is important to him to show me how much he loves me..... and who am I to disappoint him!!!
The large diamond that was my mother's has been offered to junior Grammy to ask his honey's hand in marriage.
26
posted on
12/02/2004 3:25:42 PM PST
by
Grammy
To: bootless
To: najida
Which fish pond? I have a fake diamond locator !!!
28
posted on
12/02/2004 3:27:00 PM PST
by
GeekDejure
( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
To: Mr. Mojo
I know one girl who'd like diamond-inlay on her CZ. Are you talking about me? LOL ;-)
To: swilhelm73
Whatever. Im quite happy with my 2 carat platinum setting. Oddly, I get a lot of compliments on it from men. Women glance and act like they didnt see it. Its kind of amusing. I also hope it is a conflict diamond. I'm mean too >:)
30
posted on
12/02/2004 3:28:48 PM PST
by
meowmeow
(We are all Buckhead!)
To: Chad Fairbanks
31
posted on
12/02/2004 3:42:22 PM PST
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: swilhelm73
This gal likes pearls and opals. I don't see any big deal about diamonds. If a setting is pretty it would be just as pretty with a CZ. But, I'd still rather have pearls.
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Actually I prefer amber, garnets, tanzanite and amethyst. Diamonds just don't do it for me unless they are colored diamonds which are indeed rare and quite out of my price range. Yeah, color is much more interesting! :-)
To: Wneighbor
Pearls are good too. And jade. I adore jade, there is nothing like the silky feel of a good piece of jade.
34
posted on
12/02/2004 3:56:59 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The future is all around us, waiting in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation.)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
And jade. I adore jade, there is nothing like the silky feel of a good piece of jade.I like those smooth silky feels too!
And in my even simpler tastes, I really like malachite. Green is my favorite color so jade and malachite are really nice to me.
To: Wneighbor
A dear friend gave me the most beautiful piece of malachite and garnet.
It is even more lovely because he took the time to find out what I loved and get it for me.
36
posted on
12/02/2004 4:16:48 PM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The future is all around us, waiting in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation.)
To: swilhelm73
Give her a diamond. Or a bunch of them. And she'll love you back. I don't think that's entirely true. There's a lot of below awareness associations going on. What she loves is security.
The fact that you can give her a diamond means you can give her security. The fact that you gave her a diamond means you're hers, so the set of the behaviors that we know as an expression of love is directed at you.
Should you at some time lose all, with some evidence that you will never recover, she will divorce you and the reason given for the divorce will never be the above. She can't be forthcoming with the real reason because it is universally acknowledged to be bad and few will willingly think of themselves, and want others to think of them, as a bad person.
This is not bad. This is nature. It's the driver software that comes with the womb feature. Just as it's the driver software that comes with a man's linear/logical feature the makes him listen to a tearful problem and try to solve it instead of sympathizing with it.
There are exceptions but most of them reside as characters in works of fiction.
37
posted on
12/02/2004 4:22:06 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: swilhelm73
We tested that idea. We went to Grand Central Station in New York with two rings. One was a piece of cubic zirconia, worth about a dollar. The other was a $10,000 diamond. I asked people which they liked more. Most people could not tell the difference. Of dozens of people we asked, nearly half picked the cubic zirconia. I'm sure that if they had done the same experiment with real Rolex watches versus fake Rolex watches, half the people would have said that they liked the fake Rolex watch more. If two items look exactly alike, and you can only compare the two items by looking at them, why should anybody be surprised that about 50% of the people would like one item and the other 50% would like the other item.
38
posted on
12/02/2004 4:25:31 PM PST
by
usadave
To: Chad Fairbanks
I'd like to think that a Jewish diamond merchant made money off of my purchase, and then gave part of the proceeds to Israel so they could kill members of the intifada. That's my contribution to whirled peas.
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I inherited a 3 carat marquis cut diamond solitaire ring from my MIL, it's really beautiful, but there's almost nowhere to wear it...not church, or work, going out casually...I never saw her wear it either...
I'm going to give it to my DIL for her 25th anniversary, in 11 years.
I also inherited a 18" strand of real pearls from my mother...Daddy gave them to me when she died, shortly before I had my first child...he said, "Mom wanted you to have these," and we both cried...those I will give to my daughter someday.
40
posted on
12/02/2004 4:37:03 PM PST
by
Judith Anne
(Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson