Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Melee in Chile seen as 'big deal'
Washington Times ^ | 11/23/04 | Jerry Seper and Bill Sammon

Posted on 11/22/2004 9:40:22 PM PST by kattracks

White House officials were still shaking their heads in disbelief yesterday that President Bush personally had to rescue a U.S. Secret Service agent from angry Chilean security officials Saturday night.
    "This is a pretty big deal," said a senior White House official, who called the incident a "melee."


    "I mean, the guy who was supposed to be guarded had to rescue the guy who was supposed to be guarding him."
    The official expressed astonishment that Chilean security officials had stopped the No. 2 agent on Mr. Bush's security detail from accompanying the president into a meeting with another world leader, an unprecedented public breach of security arrangements agreed upon in advance.

[snip]

In contrast to Chile, which rejected Secret Service protocols, Colombia ceded control of 15,000 of its troops to the United States when Mr. Bush visited there yesterday. Colombian President Alvaro Uribe also agreed to allow heavily armed U.S. Navy forces to patrol the waters around Cartegena in rubber boats.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; apec; bringbackpinochet; bush; chile; napalminthemorning; uribe; usss; w; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 next last
To: Kensei
LOL!

Leni

141 posted on 11/23/2004 7:39:58 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: texasflower
You are a very unpleasant person.

I am not! And you can't prove it ;^)

I suppose the only point I would leave you with is this; we don't know why what happened happened. Everything we post here is speculation, nothing more. We may never have all the facts of the incident. Pray for "W".

FGS

142 posted on 11/23/2004 7:49:35 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

Kewl!


143 posted on 11/23/2004 8:44:41 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar; texasflower
"...There unquestionably was a flaw in the security arrangements. Whatever the reason for it, the fact is the Chileans showed just how easy it is to separate the President of the United States from his Secret Service guards. Whatever the reason for it, that flaw in how they guard him must be fixed."

Thank you for succinctly articulating this perspective exactly as intended but failed by me.  I was too angry at this breach of security to construct an objective sentence (see #26, LOL) of this.  I stewed on it before this article was posted and couldn't quite gather as well as you have in your summation above.

I have shaken hands with two former USA Presidents and have been within several feet of both Bush Sr. & Jr. several times, all campaign stuff.   I've posted 'in person' threads/posts/pics with W's campaign appearances this fall in MI. on FR.

Nothing can be assumed (see tagline) and an assumption was made to 'trust' these protocols (Chilean incident) and hence the melee.

Until one gets within a few feet of the leader of the free world on multiple occasions over decades one may not realize how scary it really is every freakin' second in these situations and how much work it really is to prevent it. 

And 'Wolfstar' are you an astronomy buff or just a coincidence in a 'quantum' universe?     ;-)

144 posted on 11/23/2004 8:49:32 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: quantim; Wolfstar
Okay quantim. I can definitely agree with you on this part of Wolfstar's post. Maybe all of it. (Sorry wolfstar, I didn't read your entire post , but I know you are usually very reasonable, so I trust the rest of it is good as well.)

...There unquestionably was a flaw in the security arrangements. Whatever the reason for it, the fact is the Chileans showed just how easy it is to separate the President of the United States from his Secret Service guards. Whatever the reason for it, that flaw in how they guard him must be fixed."

145 posted on 11/23/2004 8:56:37 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: texasflower

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2550-2004Nov21.html?referrer=email
snip
Bush and the first lady walked into the beaux-arts banquet hall, and Chilean officers, who appeared to be waiting for the moment, stepped in front of Trotta, blocking him from entering.

U.S. officials said Chilean police had been chafing for a week about a demand by Secret Service agents that they control the president's space, even when he was on sovereign turf. Now, it was payback time.

In the fracas that ensued, amid a flurry of half nelsons, one Secret Service agent wound up jammed against a wall. "You're not stopping me! You're not stopping me! I'm with the president!" an unidentified agent can be heard yelling on videotape of the mayhem.
snip


146 posted on 11/23/2004 9:34:53 PM PST by MEG33 ( Congratulations President Bush!..Thank you God. Four More Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Thank you for that link. That's a great article.

I would love to have seen the faces of the Chilean jerks when they realized the President of the United States himself was intervening.

I hope they wet themselves. And I hope they are now unemployed.


147 posted on 11/23/2004 11:12:24 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
You posted a response where you appeared to be attacking 'kattracks'. Your quoted statement did not refer to anything she had written, so it was easy to think it came from you. Next time, I suggest you indicate that this was a quote posted by another poster, and indicate that what you are writing is . You created the misunderstanding.
148 posted on 11/23/2004 11:15:41 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake; All; thegreatbeast

Am reminded by this thread . . . somehow . . . of this prophetic type warning and call to prayer. If led, please pray as led against such possibilities . . . and for the safety of our beloved COWBOY AND HIS FAMILY.

As I recall, it was originally sent out via THE ELIJAH LIST and to me via INJESUS.COM and a list I'm on there.




PRAYER REQUEST FOR PRESIDENT BUSH:

DEAR ONES,

This prophetic warning and prayer request resonates with me more than a little extra.

I've felt for a long time that the puppet masters have had the Secret Service infiltrated fairly wholesale.

I've been praying that the traitors will be discovered and expelled post haste.

I'm assuming, as has been intimated to me by folks in such positions to know, that The President is being appraised of fitting warnings such as this one.

But I believe that the key issue is the prayers of earnest Believers to do the SPIRITUAL WARFARE against the demonic forces driving all the traitors.

I've long felt that there was a well connected, wealthy puppet master tasked with or keenly dedicated to removing President Bush at an appointed time. This warning fits uncomfortably well with my own feelings that I've had for so long.

PLEASE PRAY AS HOLY SPIRIT REMINDS YOU AS YOU FEEL LED. I hope, that includes, particularly against such plots and that the plotters be exposed and punished.

I don't have any real insight about the shoes thing but I feel there is a big key there which we should pray that people in positions to do something about it--that God will reveal to them specifically what that key is and how to deal with it.

BLESS OUR PRESIDENT, FAMILY AND PATRIOTIC ADVISORS; MAY GOD EXPOSE AND REMOVE THE OTHERS; MAY ALL WHO PRAY BE PROTECTED AND BLESSED, AS WELL. IN JESUS' NAME, AMEN.

LUB,
Quix








EMERGENCY
PRAYER ALERT FOR
PRESIDENT BUSH

Dear Friends,

I have recently had a dream and felt strongly that I needed to share it with you so that we could be praying in one accord against its possible meaning and outcome.

In the dream I saw a very rich man who had a large organization behind him. He had for sometime been infiltrating the President Bush's secret service. He had been collecting the shoes of the secret service agents. I saw piles and piles of shoes that he had collected over a long period of time.

Then the scene changed and I saw many secret service agents running furiously towards a building where President Bush was having a meeting. They were running, but could not run very fast because they had no shoes.

As I ran with them to the building I saw agent after agent running from the building all bloody, collapsing on the ground. Other agents were carrying their wounded comrades from the building and laying them on the ground.

As I entered the building the carnage increased. I saw dead and brutally wounded agents literally covering the floor. The scene was horrific. The agents who were frantically trying to help their wounded friends were shocked and overwhelmed by the atrocity they saw.

I stopped one of them and asked him what happened. He said, "It was a trap!" I asked him if the President was okay and he looked at me with a blank stare - then I woke up.

Friends, it doesn't matter what your political stance is - I ask you to pray for President Bush's safety and the safety of his secret service agents. We must pray that his agents will not be distracted or beguiled by anything or anyone with plans to harm them or our President, and that the enemy's plans will be exposed.

I feel this attack is planned to happen soon and we must intercede immediately to stop the plans of the enemy.

In the dream, I did not know for sure if the President had been harmed. I believe that is because the outcome is uncertain at this time. If we pray and ask God to intervene on his behalf we will alter the course of the enemy's plans.

And in Jesus' name, I say that NO WEAPON FORMED AGAINST PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH WILL PROSPER!!!

God bless you dear saints and I thank you in advance for your mighty prayers.

Love and blessings,

Victoria


149 posted on 11/23/2004 11:21:46 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper

From my limited awareness, sounds like very astute observations--highly likely, imho.

And, not overly worldly wise and certainly not remotely empathetic to the realities about being President of the USA in a post 911 world.


150 posted on 11/23/2004 11:29:15 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: OregonRancher

Please elaborate about the purple?

A royal thing?


151 posted on 11/23/2004 11:31:30 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

MUCH AGREE. GOOD POINTS, imho.


152 posted on 11/23/2004 11:40:27 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: texasflower

Would appreciate your aside comments about my feelings posted above and those of the person with the dream or vision about the Sec Serv being infiltrated by puppet master guys as I've long felt.


153 posted on 11/23/2004 11:44:19 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: quantim

I strongly agree. thanks.


154 posted on 11/23/2004 11:46:16 PM PST by Quix (5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Quix
And in Jesus' name, I say that NO WEAPON FORMED AGAINST PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH WILL PROSPER!!!

Amen...

.

155 posted on 11/23/2004 11:52:53 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

"Do you think this sort of thing would have happened to a Democrat President? Sincere question here."

Yes I think they will too. Here in New Zealand there were talks from the New Zealand Police back in 1996 that they had wanted requirements all foreign heads of government must have unarmed bodyguards when making visits to New Zealand. "Only the NZ Police's Diplomatic Protection Squad could be armed to protect the dignitaries according to firearms control laws of New Zealand. This is the Kiwi way."

Of course it was changed in 1998 then when it was clear Clinton was coming to Auckland for APEC in 1999. But at least the Left here and the NZ Police were visibly unhappy about it (yes, even with Clinton our Left still hated him just because he was the US President - they won't be happy with any US President to the right of Noam Chomsky). They feel that this is New Zealand's turf and foreign heads of states' bodyguards acting to protect their bosses were applying the laws of their own countries in NZ and breaching its sovereignty.


156 posted on 11/23/2004 11:57:59 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Disclaimer: this poster is a naturalized NZer born in Hong Kong, not a expat Kiwi in HK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Haha, the same thing happened to Hu Jintao's bodyguards as well. So talk about equal opportunity obtructionists the Chilians are.


157 posted on 11/23/2004 11:59:09 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Disclaimer: this poster is a naturalized NZer born in Hong Kong, not a expat Kiwi in HK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Haha, the same thing happened to Hu Jintao's bodyguards as well - the only thing was that Hu didn't make his case with the Chilian security forces of letting his boys work. So talk about equal opportunity obtructionists the Chilians are.


158 posted on 11/23/2004 11:59:47 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Disclaimer: this poster is a naturalized NZer born in Hong Kong, not a expat Kiwi in HK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Correction to post #148:
... I suggest you indicate that this was a quote posted by another poster, and indicate that what you are writing is (sarcasm). You created the misunderstanding.


159 posted on 11/24/2004 12:30:56 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
No. A Democratic President would have left his S-agent in the dust. Probably would have him fired for being involved in an incident and not using his "Jedi" mind trick.

Either that or he would have waded into the melee and helped the Chileans slap the agent around some before firing him. I'm sure that everyone remembers sKerry's disregard for his S-service detail during the campaign.

Bush is just too awesome! I wonder what call sign his detail has given him? What ever it is it should be "Grand Hombre."
160 posted on 11/24/2004 1:30:58 AM PST by CONGHUNTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson