Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye, Dollar—and Empire
The American Conservative ^ | November 22, 2004 | by Pat Buchanan

Posted on 11/17/2004 1:54:14 AM PST by BellStar

Whoever wins Nov. 2, two predictions seem solid: the mighty U.S. dollar has begun an inexorable decline, and the American empire is coming to an end. For whether George W. Bush wins or loses, America is headed for a political gridlock that will rule out any bipartisan assault on our “twin deficits.”

No matter who wins, the House Republicans of Tom DeLay will retain the numbers to veto any tax increase, while Democrats will retain the strength to prevent any serious cuts in entitlements.

Thus no successful assault will be made in the next four years on a fiscal deficit of $415 billion (4 percent of GDP) before the first wave of 77 million Baby Boomers reaches early retirement in 2008. After that, goodbye balanced budgets forever.

Our trade deficit is now $600 billion a year, with a deficit in goods near $700 billion. To finance our binge buying overseas, we borrow $2 billion a day from abroad. Foreigners are using the dollars to snap up our stocks, bonds, and real estate, gaining a permanent lien on the future rents, interest, and dividends of U.S. enterprises. We have mortgaged our children’s future to enjoy the good times today.

The Baby Boomers, celebrated by liberals in the 1960s as the “finest young generation we have ever produced,” will likely go down in U.S. history as the most self-indulgent and selfish.

To sustain our appetite for foreign goods, the world is being flooded with dollars. But there are signs that world is growing weary of financing our consumption. The price of oil, denominated in dollars, has soared to $55 a barrel. The price of gold has risen from $260 an ounce to $420. The dollar has lost a third of its value against the euro under Bush. The world is betting against us.

The only question seems to be: will the dollar’s decline be gradual or will there be a run on the dollar, as with the Mexican peso? If the latter, the Fed would have to raise U.S. interest rates to bring investors back into the market to buy the Treasury bonds to finance our budget deficit. Then, bye-bye recovery.

A sinking dollar also means rising prices for imports, which are now near a two-century high at 15 percent of our entire economy.

The deindustrialization of America could be reversed if we were willing to return to Hamiltonian economics, rewrite our tax and trade laws, and dump the WTO into the Atlantic. But the transnational corporations that finance both parties will not allow it, for their executives have grown royally rich transferring factories out of the United States into the low-wage countries of Asia and the Third World.

The dirty little secret of our era is that the interests of Middle America are now in conflict with the interests of America’s corporate elites. They are anxious to get out of the United States and shed their American work force.

In sustaining the empire, we are suffering from a separate deficit—of imperial troops. With an army of only 480,000, only a fraction of them combat troops, we cannot both defeat the rising Iraqi insurgency and credibly threaten Iran and North Korea with a preventive war to achieve regime change. And Iran and North Korea know it.

Any attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would invite Iranian support for Shia insurgents in Iraq and acts of terror against American installations across the Middle East. U.S. casualties would rise, oil prices would hit $80 a barrel, and the war of civilizations could be upon us. Any attack on North Korea’s nuclear facilities could ignite a peninsular war and risk atomic retaliation on U.S. troops.

Where would we get the troops to fight such a war? Should a President Bush or Kerry ask for a draft to fight another land war in Asia, Congress would turn him down or be turned out of office.

Walter Lippmann described a credible foreign policy as one that “consists in bringing into balance, with a comfortable surplus of power in reserve, the nation’s commitments and the nation’s power.” By that standard, U.S. foreign policy is bankrupt. Under the Bush Doctrine, we are committed to fight until we pacify and democratize Iraq, and to be prepared to wage preventive wars on Iran and North Korea to deny them nuclear weapons.

Yet we do not have the troops to guarantee these goals. Moreover, we lack the military, if challenged, to honor all the guarantees we have given to the NATO nations, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Australia, and Thailand.

The Dow is falling, the dollar is sinking, our dependency on imported oil is growing, our country goes billions deeper into debt every day, and U.S. forces are stretched to the limit containing a medium-sized insurgency in a medium-sized Arab country.

An American empire? Who are we kidding?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bipartisan; cuts; deficit; dollar; entitlements; patbuchanan; sinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
So Freepers, what say you?
1 posted on 11/17/2004 1:54:14 AM PST by BellStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BellStar

Good Bye Pat and take your lunacy with you!


2 posted on 11/17/2004 1:55:38 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Gee, and I was feeling so good about the elections!


3 posted on 11/17/2004 1:59:16 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I don't but Pat's argument.


4 posted on 11/17/2004 1:59:41 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I don't BUY Pat's argument.


5 posted on 11/17/2004 1:59:53 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
They are anxious to get out of the United States and shed their American work force.

I am anxious for corporate leaders to move to the third world and live among those they exploit.

6 posted on 11/17/2004 2:00:01 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BellStar

Pat is nuts.


7 posted on 11/17/2004 2:01:10 AM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Keep feeling good! Pat is braindead and clueless as far as lots of things go.


8 posted on 11/17/2004 2:01:18 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Only his paltry few sycophants here do.Nobody else buys anything he says.


9 posted on 11/17/2004 2:02:11 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BellStar

Man, Arafat's death really shook this guy.


10 posted on 11/17/2004 2:02:45 AM PST by wildcatf4f3 (out of the sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Pat has an uncanny ability to focus in on the exact problem and then draw absolutely wrong conclusions.


11 posted on 11/17/2004 2:03:41 AM PST by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
I would have thought that Pat would hail the decline in the strength of the dollar as it acts as a de facto tariff on foreign goods.
12 posted on 11/17/2004 2:03:55 AM PST by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
"will the dollar’s decline be gradual or will there be a run on the dollar, as with the Mexican peso?"

I was going to say who wrote this? Oh my! I know Pat is better than this. If he wants to gripe on the international monetary policy, I'm with him. But the above statement is out of touch with reality.

13 posted on 11/17/2004 2:04:19 AM PST by endthematrix ("Hey, it didn't hit a bone, Colonel. Do you think I can go back?" - U.S. Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell

That he has and that he does.


14 posted on 11/17/2004 2:05:27 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Bingo.


15 posted on 11/17/2004 2:05:39 AM PST by endthematrix ("Hey, it didn't hit a bone, Colonel. Do you think I can go back?" - U.S. Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: durasell

lol


16 posted on 11/17/2004 2:06:03 AM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BellStar

Only Pat could mistake decline for ascendancy.


17 posted on 11/17/2004 2:06:43 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Democrat Obstructionists will be Daschled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Noooooooooooooooooooo,Pat is NOT "better" than this. This IS standard Pat!


18 posted on 11/17/2004 2:06:47 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
We have been hearing about the imminent demise of the dollar for so long that I wonder these days about folks that predict it yet another time. It is inevitable that it will be finished some day. I suppose the theory is if you happen to be the last one to predict it, you will be hailed as some prescient being.

We can only hope Delay wins, because the ONLY thing standing between Democrats plus other liberals and new entitlements is the lack of money to print or give away.

As to the current weakness of the dollar, we have gone through that before. The antidote is growth without inflation and responsible spending at the public trough. We have just started to come out of a severe recession. I've noticed (surprise, surprise now that the election is over) several bits of good economic news. Since I haven't seen anything about the demise of European socialism, I s'pect we will begin to notice the dollar improving versus the euro to it's normal equilibrium.

19 posted on 11/17/2004 2:09:16 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.; anymouse

Bump


20 posted on 11/17/2004 2:10:00 AM PST by BellStar (Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice Clarence Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson